Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
only-one1701
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
151.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
As the parent of a young kid: how do you do this? Does this just mean not giving them a smartphone until they’re teenagers? Not letting them take it to school. My oldest kid isn’t even four yet, but I’m already wondering about how to limit
152.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
Would love to know your thoughts on what differentiates people. Perhaps race?
153.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
When I saw this headline I thought it was going to be a blog post about announcements of heads of engineering leaving at a given company X. I hate that stupid name.
154.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
Mea culpa: they’re not being deprecated. But the existence of custom hooks removes the bulk of (if not all of) their utility, and make it much easier to reason about code and make your code well-typed.
155.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
So I mostly agree with you, but I think there's some real dissatisfaction with React and Remix/React-Router's emphasis on SSR. If you don't care about SEO, there's really not that much SSR gives you that CSR doesn&#
156.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
They're very much not "best practices", and will be deprecated soon (if they're not already).
157.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
React's been around long enough and is dug in deep enough to have decent ROI on knowing fairly well, but the recent obsession with Next.js and SSR...maybe not. Privately I think this might be their undoing.
158.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
The biggest problem by far with the frontend ecosystem is that it assumes everyone's been writing perfect frontend code which makes deprecation/migration a breeze. Frontend is much more forgiving then backend, which means you can
159.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
The question isn't "is frontend simpler than backend?" (which I don't think is as simple as you make it out to be). The question is "can LLMs replace frontend developers?" I think it's a bit like Squarespa
160.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
I think the person above was alluding to the idea that the determination of whether or not LLMs are good at frontend development is the idea that frontend development is flexbox. That's like me saying "LLMs will replace all develo
161.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
Genuine question: why do you think LLMs will be able to handle frontend development in a way they won’t be able to handle backend development? I assume you’re talking about real companies, not toy projects or websites for restaurants or wha
162.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
It's a "yes and" situation. You're completely correct that people who were already in tech just became more wealthy, but there's no question that in the mid to late teens (in particular), tech fundamentally became,
163.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
Also, a quick glance at the wikipedia page for "copyright" talks about the first law being put down and enforced in 1710. What are we even doing here?
164.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
As another commenter says, this is about IP, but even positing that copyright is somehow invalid because it’s new is incredibly obtuse. You know what other law is relatively new? Women’s suffrage. I’m annoyed by arguments like the above bec
165.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
“The Venetian Patent Statute of 19 March 1474, established by the Republic of Venice, is usually considered to be the earliest codified patent system in the world.[11][12] It states that patents might be granted for "any new and ingeni
166.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
As an AWS Solution Architect - Associate, I can confidently say they should’ve been using AWS Macie (tongue in cheek btw)
167.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
Good lord I’m not sure I’ve ever heard it put so succinctly. Well done.
168.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
Ideally it's the responsibility of management, starting at the top, to think critically about what kind of software most benefits the company and reward those that do it. Unfortunately, it's much harder to sell "amazing docum
169.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
People sincerely think we're < 5 years away from this?
170.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
Maybe I'm just cynical, but I wonder how much of this initiative and energy is driven by people at Microsoft who want their own star to rise higher than it can when it's bound by a third-party technology. I feel like this is somet
171.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
What even is AGI? Like, what does it look like? Genuine question.
172.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
In my experience, there's a time limit on how long these kinds of people can be good managers from the perspective of accurately assessing a) which ICs are contributing what and b) how long it it'll take to implement something. Th
173.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
You need to have a subscription to read (I don't).
174.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
Oh my god dude, who do you think is the major subsidizer of private industry research?
175.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
That’s not what equivocation means, genius
176.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
I genuinely wonder if this is a "too big to fail" scenario though, where mass belief (and maybe a helping hand via govt subsidies/regulations) powers it to a point where everything is just kind of worse but cheaper for shareh
177.
▲
by
only-one1701
2y ago
If the latter is the case, then it's only a matter of time. Enshitification, etc.