Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
oneplane
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
66 ms
·
781.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
There seems to be an increasing disconnect between the marketing value of a term ("DevOps") and what we're actually supposed to be doing, which might best be described as blameless accountability. Even in information security
782.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
This was mostly aimed at the various ways the XML document may or may not conform to any number of XSD types. What we 'see' as a table might not be described and stored as a table in the same way in XML. And with XML I mean whatev
783.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
OCR has come a long way, so much that visually interpreting a PDF is about as error-prom as parsing XML output from Microsoft in non-microsoft software.
784.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
IIRC the other operations are only supported on the other linux media framework (of which I can't remember the name - but it's the newer one than v4l2), and most examples I saw (a while back with a RK3399 dev board) were using lib
785.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
Indeed, but conversely, China will have access to ARM no matter what. This also means that we can sanction all we want, they locally have the fabs and IP to create ARM, RISC-V, MIPS and even x86 CPUs (and they are already doing all of that)
786.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
Unless they actually get the company seal and remove the armed guards and gain control of the building, it's all just PR. On top of that, even then there is nothing to prevent this from happening again, and anything that already has be
787.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
The RK3399 does have a rather limited ISP, not something you'd want to pump 88M in. If you were to use only 1 camera and combine the two ISP nodes it has you'd have a maximum of 26M. This is also why they used a IMX258 as anything
788.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
I doubt that matters considering China stole a complete copy of ARM (the company) and has already released new IP under their rebranded name.
789.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
Doesn't matter how good the hardware is if the software can't make it useful for users, which is largely the problem here. Most of those 'high MP' cameras are also not really useful anymore without an ISP and those aren&
790.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
Because unsolicited mass mailing IS spam, and spam is BAD.
791.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
For us and our clients it's the other way around. Slack's threads work, everyone else's threads suck (Teams and Discord included, but Teams is even worse than Discord).
792.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
This is from 2018
793.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
If your application has to go to disk to fetch something it's already accepted that it'll take time. Things that need to be really fast go to RAM or cache. For everything else you're already getting into niches.
794.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
Ironically, it gets worse the more money you throw at it, even if you picked cost as a preferred focus.
795.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
The article seems to forget that calling a module "hardware" doesn't mean there's no CPU on that "hardware" with software running on top of it. Same goes for DPUs, which are essentially just single-board comput
796.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
That's great (for you), but there's no telling what "works like a charm" actually means, and no real way to tell if the specs as-advertised still match the specs-post-repair. This is also why Apple doesn't bother wi
797.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
Highly unlikely considering it also contains the secure enclave and considering it's PKI-based security you will only ever get chips that are matched to a serial number. Pretty much the same way Intel chips are matched to Intel PCHs us
798.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
I wouldn't be too surprised if they simply hire armies of reviewers that simply work through a checklist with limited room for interpretation/personal evaluation. I a way, they could just publish their internal checklist to make t
799.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
It's somewhat a case of "they almost went there"; around the time that MCX (Managed Client for Mac OS X) and Apple Remote Desktop (the central management tool, not the built-in one) peaked, they also had the option of selecti
800.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
For what reason?
801.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
Look like the US version of SEPA transfers (technology-wise) like (somewhat) described at https://www.europeanpaymentscouncil.eu/what-we-do/sepa-payme... but instead of just SWIFT (which is what is also ISO 20022 suppo
802.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
Multiple reasons (as outlined partially by others): - It is incredibly hard to make something so versatile work well everywhere, all the time, for everything - It is even harder to get multiple stakeholders to do this consistently -
803.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
It's a euphemism for trade restrictions.
804.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
TL:DR If you have a domain with Godaddy, move on to a proper service. Depending on what you need, https://dnsimple.com seems to have a good reputation, I also see a bunch of people spreading their risk by putting DNS on one big
805.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
I'm not entirely sure how any of this matters. Tools and what bar they have to pass are just design choices. If you design a tool to be bad, it will be bad, no matter who manufactures them or where. At the same time, if you don't
806.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
Some of the choices are neither privacy nor security improvements. Take quarantine or integrity protection or signature validation for example. Those three alone limit drive-by binary malware rather effectively. The only thing one could arg
807.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
I doubt any company wil accept that, and suddenly owning a new house with no data on where that money might have come from will raise so many red flags, you'll be able too start a new flag company.
808.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
If we were to try to assess fairness, wouldn't it make sense to also take effects and side-effects into account? Say a disproportionate amount of poor families cheat, but also end up on the street after an audit, either not able to pay
809.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
It doesn't go away by itself, but you can of course physically move it (including ingesting it).
810.
▲
by
oneplane
4y ago
I think that any view cache works fine with edge caching. Worst case your first request has to traverse the CDN network to your compute once every cache invalidation. That said, none of the static site renderers really do anything special t
More ›