oneoff786

13 ms·

91.
by oneoff786 4y ago
Genetics?? Absolutely not. You need to have a feeling for the cultural context around some things to appreciate them. It also doesn’t take much work to refresh a song’s styling and execution to sound relatable.
92.
by oneoff786 4y ago
If LeBron James dies and someone somehow has the rights to his likeness, they are not an agent however. They are the rights holder. Perhaps they coincidentally also have an agent doing the work, but it is not LeBron James’s agent. :)
93.
by oneoff786 4y ago
Better to demand deeply personal information on all women rather than let a trans woman secretly compete in high school athletics with an unfair advantage right? God forbid we let someone play a sport with their peers.
94.
by oneoff786 4y ago
Well if you’re Tom Cruise’s agent you get a commission for the work Tom Cruise does. Not his likeness.
95.
by oneoff786 4y ago
Because there’s someone dumber willing to give you money for it
96.
by oneoff786 4y ago
Then go redeem one. We’re all watching.
97.
by oneoff786 4y ago
You are cherry picking a dumb example. We don’t shit on paint when someone makes poop. What you should be cherry picking is examples of art that people would consider profound upon seeing it. Otherwise you’ll simply look like a dumbass when
98.
by oneoff786 4y ago
Your opinion is not the only one that I’m addressing. I clearly understand your point which I address by: > What you’re really complaining about is creation of art from apparent randomness. Not the AI model alone but monkeys on a typewri
99.
by oneoff786 4y ago
I agree. Alyx was a lot of smoke and mirrors. I think it is the best VR has. But VR sucks. Alyx highlights 3 issues in combat. 1) you can’t move irl enough to dodge bullets. You can duck behind cover. But moving is hard. I also suspected so
100.
by oneoff786 4y ago
I disagree. I don’t care much about what is profound. I think most of it is not. Things that we call profound are really just astute observations of patterns in the real world, and there’s nothing wrong with that. However profundity doesn’t
101.
by oneoff786 4y ago
I’m gonna go ahead and guess that they would rather do that than be in a coal mine, with safety gear.
102.
by oneoff786 4y ago
> To insist that we're just a bunch of walking, breathing prompt-reproducers essentially seems like it's rooted in a belief that we have no interior lives, and that meaning in writing or art is utterly illusory Let’s assume hum
103.
by oneoff786 4y ago
I believe there is only one goofy at a time, ever.
104.
by oneoff786 4y ago
Deferring blindly to any government is a dumb strategy.
105.
by oneoff786 4y ago
You can’t really look at numbers like that to paint a full picture. Net income in particular is sensitive to one time events. In this case, imo, it looks like the most important story is that revenue per user is falling hard. 17% more users
106.
by oneoff786 4y ago
That datapoint is a forecast derived from many data points. You may not agree with the forecast, but the count is not persuasive.
107.
by oneoff786 4y ago
I believe the fees get rationed out according to your listening. They don’t pay anything more if you listen to a song 10x vs 1000x. I’m not sure off the top of my head if that’s user level proportions or aggregate.
108.
by oneoff786 4y ago
Why not? You don’t think they could eek out an additional 70 cents per month per customer if they wanted to focus on that right now?
109.
by oneoff786 4y ago
The bacteria is one thing, but acidic foods are another. Brushing after citrus will destroy your teeth over time. Not sure about coffee.
110.
by oneoff786 4y ago
While I agree the garden walls should fall for integration, it seems very reasonable that teams would be a part of office, much like outlook. Chat and Video calls are increasingly a feature rather than a product. It would be crazy if they w
111.
by oneoff786 4y ago
Hmm but I feel like teams does make sense to be part of something like enterprise windows, no?
112.
by oneoff786 4y ago
What do you think needs to be urgent broken off there?
113.
by oneoff786 4y ago
I think it would still pale in comparison to the splitting of AWS from Amazon though
114.
by oneoff786 4y ago
I’m not so sure. It can be easier to pay for contractors for various budgeting reasons.
115.
by oneoff786 4y ago
I recall reading studies that suggested it was not the quantity of time spent with parents but the quality that seemed to correlate with long term results. Provided the actual needs of the child were taken care of by someone.
116.
by oneoff786 4y ago
With the availability of things like pyspark the grey zone between pandas scale and pyspark scale is small and uncommon though. Especially for the awkward tabular data manipulation tasks where you actually need to be mapping custom function
117.
by oneoff786 4y ago
They are indeed small. But most real world problems operate on small data. And if it’s bigger you probably ought to be using a different toolset than Python altogether. In my experience it is exceedingly rare to find a situation where you h
118.
by oneoff786 4y ago
Data science consulting for business things. Most datasets < 1M rows
119.
by oneoff786 4y ago
I mean not writing your own loops. A built in function is indeed better. But usually not what you need. And also, readability > speed when the execution time is trivial, which is it probably should be for pandas scale data.
120.
by oneoff786 4y ago
Series.map is vectorized. Pretty much everything you need in pandas is as performant as you ought to need for doing tabular data manipulation in Python. Except dataframe.apply

More ›