Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
om2
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
37 ms
·
391.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
Safari 10.1 is still in beta but it's coming to both macOS and iOS.
392.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
There haven't been problems with it in Safari as far as we know. We also do additional throttling at our level in addition to participating in App Nap on a per-tab basis.
393.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
> You claim regarding battery life is unsubstantiated. Simple timers like that take up very little processor time as long as you don't do superfluous DOM updates in every invocation. That seems intuitively plausible, but for moder
394.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
You've solved one set of problems (and fixed the major problem that the original had no separation between library and user land code) and created some new problems: (1) A timer will fire forever, even if no progress bars are currently
395.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
> So custom components cannot be included from third party sources? If they can then this is exactly the same problem. They can, but you can separately decide whether to support components from arbitrary off-site sources (most sites woul
396.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
XHTML doesn't give you a way to automatically give behavior and composite structure to a new element. It just gives you a way to put one in your markup without the validator complaining. But it won't do anything by default.
397.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
Past attempts at component models for the web have used CSS as the hook instead of a script call. For example, Mozilla's XBL and Microsoft's HTC. This way of doing it is a security hazard because it makes CSS into active code inst
398.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
> You can create reusable UI widgets that are usable without the user knowing how they were written with an element like > <div class="FrameworkName_imageCarousel" ...> also, and your > client library handles Frame
399.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
Your example has many serious limitations: (1) It doesn't let you have multiple progress bars that all advance at their own rate. (2) It doesn't work at all for custom-progress-bar elements added dynamically to the document after
400.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
Can you explain how these are evidence against pilot wave theory? It's entirely compatible with Bell's inequality and indeed makes all the same predictions as other, more popular interpretations of QM, so it's not clear why t
401.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
I haven't confused r with g. I think you may not have thought through what these quantities represent. r is the return on capital. An asset worth A returns A*r per year. This says nothing about wether A increases or decreases. You can
402.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
You're right that I made a mistake, but it's the labor income case that is exponential, not the capital income case. Earning W r every year is constant income and linear growth in wealth (where W is your starting wealth). Earning
403.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
WHATWG HTML and W3C HTML both define a valid syntax for content, as well as parsing rules that cover everything, even error cases. Postel's Law states: "Be conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from others.&qu
404.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
> If you want to allow everyone to write a parser able to parse websites, or allow everyone to be able to write websites, then you have to replace and deprecate parts of the web. Sounds good in theory. In practice, the opposite is true.
405.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
WHATWG specs aren't "it's kind of this or that". They're more like "it's exactly X, in 20 detailed steps of excruciating detail, and if X is a legacy feature we're sorry that it's kind of weird.
406.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
That doesn't really make sense. r isn't a growth rate of the share of ownership on capital. It's a return on capital, i.e. the growth rate of capital. r implies nothing about the change in total value of capital assets. Total
407.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
r isn't the growth rate of capital's share of income though. r represent the return on capital (which is proportional to capital's share of income), not the growth rate of the return on capital, or the growth rate of capital&
408.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
It doesn't really make sense to take "percentage increase" as dimensionless, because it leads you to compare growth rate of incomparable things. One of the most basic rules of economics is that you can't compare stocks a
409.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
One thing that always puzzles me about r > g is that it's comparing a first derivative to a second derivative. How can this be meaningful? To explain further, r is return on investment, which approximately means rate of growth of we
410.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
Don't quantum harmonic oscillators oscillate even in their ground state? How is a time crystal different from a garden-variety QHO?
411.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
And fully sandboxed on both macOS and iOS!
412.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
I guess I was grading on a curve when I said "very secure".
413.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
Firefox is much less secure than other modern browsers. And Chrome is indeed very secure. But I think it's incorrect to say that it's "orders of magnitude" more secure than Safari. This hasn't been true since Safari
414.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
Isn't the notion of "upper class" in Britain usually based on peerage titles or being related to people who have them, as opposed to business ownership? A small business person is almost the epitome of middle class, to the po
415.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
Blink has diverged a fair amount. There are different new features, bug fixes and optimizations. Most things based on Chromium also use more components of the Chromium stack than just Blink. For example, in WebKit multiprocess support and s
416.
▲
by
om2
10y ago
"Mr Wright does not want to make public the proof for block 1, arguing that block 9 contains the only bitcoin address that is clearly linked to Mr Nakamoto (because he sent money to Hal Finney). Repeating the procedure for other block
417.
▲
WebKit is moving away from prefixes
(webkit.org)
304 points
by
om2
10y ago
|
72 comments
418.
▲
Release Notes for Safari Technology Preview 2
(webkit.org)
3 points
by
om2
11y ago
|
0 comments
419.
▲
by
om2
11y ago
The cited xkcd also does not do a good job of addressing freedom of speech. Many writers have used "free of speech" to refer to a broad social and cultural principle, not merely a legal doctrine, and defended it on grounds that ap
420.
▲
by
om2
11y ago
Like I said, the JS engine is likely not the main factor. But it does make a difference. I don't have a detailed breakdown to share but we do measure these things. :-) The prior poster was wrong to imply it's all down to the JS en
More ›