Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
olliej
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
56 ms
·
571.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Literally the entire argument for board and executive compensation being grossly inflated vs the people who actually do real work for companies is the responsibility they have. If an executive approves a design that kills people, they shoul
572.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
iTunes music isn't drm free?
573.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
I mean Apple's iTunes is at this point one of the only services that lets you "buy" TV shows and movies, and download and "archive"[1] them (for whatever that means, when the sony/playstation network is allowed
574.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Again, they do not "lease" you a device. You do not pay for the security research device, you just demonstrate that you are a legitimate security researcher (e.g. you don't just want a less secure phone because your personal
575.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Until the penalty for swatting isn't the same as blindly firing a gun in the direction of peoples homes it's not going to stop. Until US police are required to think of the safety of others before themselves, swatting will continu
576.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Ok, so who does the federal congress represent? Could it be... you know, the people? But I do realize now from looking at your other comments, this is a 30 day old account in which all you do is spout BS white supremacist, conservative, and
577.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Explain the constitutional basis for people's desire to discriminate against people of different races and religions? The CRA exists because a bunch of shithead treason states hate the constitution's requirements that they treat p
578.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
How is that worse? Are you suggesting apple should be selling or charging for them?
579.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
While also actively removing the rights of employees and claiming that is their constitutional right. Woo!
580.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
My recollection was that it was essentially company A would decide they wanted to employ person X, and they would then go to contracting firms 1 through 100 and get all of them to apply for the same person X. And they could use the contract
581.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
> While migrants can’t vote in national elections, they are counted in the census Much like prisoners and legal non-citizen residents. > Secondly, the children of illegal immigrants are citizens and can vote. People born in the US - c
582.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
> Democratic donors have openly stated that demographic changes would help them win more elections. How does "illegal immigration" impact this? You know undocumented workers cannot vote, right? Hell, you know documented, legal,
583.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
An employee with an H1-B is definitionally not an illegal immigrant. H1-Bs are definitionally documented legal workers, the companies using undocumented workers are not companies interested in getting visas. The solution to the "appare
584.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Oh, so this looks like it's correcting for that thing where companies were essentially using multiple contracting companies to all apply for a visa for the same person? e.g. double (triple? n-ary?) dipping in the lotto? I still think a
585.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
It's weird that air carriers can sell lost luggage, but if you find someones stuff and sell it, it's typically illegal. People report their missing luggage, definitionally air carriers know the passengers. Without explicit consent
586.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
The plan was always web apps, they're vastly more secure than any other option. That's a significant part of why safari for windows ever existed. The problem was developers just wanted to write native apps, presumably believing th
587.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
But see that's exactly the point. It's much easier for developers to support the majority browser, and that's what they do. MS did lots of shitty things to ensure that once IE was the majority browser it stayed there, but no
588.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
“ This feature reminded me of the MySpace worm in ~2005 (heck, I wasn't even alive then!)” Goddammit young people :D
589.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Yeah, but you can also point to features in Safari or Firefox that chrome doesn't have (weirdly often CSS features?) and make the same argument. But if you say "only supporting chrome is the easiest option" you're also s
590.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
The article in this context of additional browser engines being allowed. I do however recognize web developers looking forward to just saying “you must use chrome”, just as they spent decades saying you have to use IE.
591.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
I can’t speak for this article, but they’ve got a page dedicated to the rules for non-system webkit browser engines
592.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
To enforce permissions the OS needs to know what those permissions are. That's what entitlements are, and the App Store review is what ensures you don't have bogus entitlements. There are entitlements that, for example, control wh
593.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Which we know from the IE dominated era does not matter, people just switch to the browser they have to use. The overwhelming majority of users do not know what a user agent string is, let alone how to change it they just see an increasing
594.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Ok, so I get that you want to be able to install random binaries on your phone, but I want to understand how you think that could happen without undermining the platform security model? The inability of binaries to do malicious things on iO
595.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
So we're agreed that playstation, xbox, and Nintendo stores should also be regulated in the same way?
596.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Yes, and literally the whole point of this law is to remove that gate.
597.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
So I'm guessing you didn't read the article then?
598.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
Looking forward to being required to use Chrome for basic browsing. I already see numerous sites that with chrome variations on the old "we only support IE", but at least until now devs had to at least allow at least one other bro
599.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
My original comment was thinking of the things that have high resale value - e.g. the actual computers, phones, etc but from other comments it sounds like they've got sufficient methods in place to make such devices worthless (I guess
600.
▲
by
olliej
3y ago
One big issue in developer productivity that seems less overlooked now is testing and test turnover time. I guess you could argue this falls under the responsiveness banner in the article, but that doesn't really discuss the extensiven
More ›