olgeni

13 ms·

91.
by olgeni 11y ago
"No ext4" might be a feature.
92.
by olgeni 11y ago
Too bad nobody noticed.
93.
by olgeni 11y ago
I'd skip the "Debian" part if possible.
94.
by olgeni 11y ago
Step 1: gems, npm, pip, etc. Step 2: "containers". Step 3: this.
95.
by olgeni 11y ago
A new drama every day.
96.
by olgeni 11y ago
Burnout driven programming.
97.
by olgeni 11y ago
Good - more diversity is needed in war criminals.
98.
by olgeni 11y ago
This stopped being fun after actually having to use Debian at work.
99.
by olgeni 11y ago
Not sure why it says "Linux/UNIX".
100.
by olgeni 11y ago
Straight from Black Mirror.
101.
by olgeni 11y ago
Sorry, but I'm really not going to explain intersectional cisgender privilege (or whatever) to the guy panhandling on the street.
102.
by olgeni 11y ago
Run away, parkour style.
103.
by olgeni 11y ago
Maybe put some effort in cross-platform software.
104.
by olgeni 11y ago
Sounds good - let's give this a spin :)
105.
by olgeni 11y ago
Looks like 17.3 from the package name. Today it might not be "way" behind, but it will be in a year or two. Or three. I can see the point of having a "stable" kernel, but these freezes are mostly random. Back in its days
106.
by olgeni 11y ago
OTP_VERSION lists minor releases, so that should be a "true" 17.3.
107.
by olgeni 11y ago
Arch has 18.0 - better indeed, but you need to keep an eye on GitHub to find out which is the actual latest version :|
108.
by olgeni 11y ago
Yes - in the beginning. If you look here https://github.com/erlang/otp/releases you'll see that - even on Jessie - 17.1 is unfortunately way behind.
109.
by olgeni 11y ago
I'm actually developing on 18.0.2. At least 17.5.x would have been better. The fact that erlang.org does not list minor releases at all probably doesn't help. One can go to erlang.org and think that 18.0 is the latest...
110.
by olgeni 11y ago
I recently had to develop an Erlang application targeting Debian "stable". It was humiliating at best. Countless hour were wasted trying to get around bugs in prehistoric packages, or building new (and working) packages from scrat
111.
by olgeni 11y ago
It is a very efficient process: you can basically guess the full content just by looking at the url.
112.
by olgeni 11y ago
Subtitles - we are doing something like that with Epson's BT-200 (also for audio description). Also, RNIB ran a trial in the UK with Games of Thrones :) [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8jyRwZjn1M ] (disclaimer - I wor
113.
by olgeni 11y ago
Of course it was. Let's do a couple of strikes too.
114.
by olgeni 12y ago
Sorry dudes, you cannot say you have a "code of conduct" unless you copy and paste from one of the two/three Big Names in the field and make a decent "voluntary" donation.
115.
by olgeni 12y ago
I searched for "white" and of course I found a few, as expected.
116.
by olgeni 12y ago
While I understand the need to pile on the subject to be counted as one of the enlightened, this kind of stuff stopped being interesting a long while ago.
117.
by olgeni 12y ago
Testing on Vagrant is quite useful when you are forced to deploy on Linux in the end.
118.
by olgeni 12y ago
I have VirtualBox + FreeBSD stable/10 but things can get weird when disk load is high (IIRC some processes can get stuck in biowr).
119.
by olgeni 12y ago
Owners of Mike Gancarz's original book might find the title kind of weird.
120.
by olgeni 12y ago
They should probably just add support for the extension pack on FreeBSD.

More ›