Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
olejorgenb
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
olejorgenb
2mo ago
They don't list which models are available without going through the sign-up process. Sorry, that's just ridiculous
32.
▲
by
olejorgenb
2mo ago
> Claude Code and Codex persist sessions as JSONL, and compaction rewrites those files in place. There is no version history, so when a session gets compacted you cannot tell what was dropped — which matters if the agent silently lost th
33.
▲
by
olejorgenb
2mo ago
https://archive.ph/WkEMo
34.
▲
by
olejorgenb
2mo ago
Compared to most other meat production farmed salmon does not use a lot of antibiotics
35.
▲
by
olejorgenb
2mo ago
No description of how the verification works?
36.
▲
by
olejorgenb
2mo ago
https://archive.ph/uTJV2
37.
▲
by
olejorgenb
2mo ago
https://www.antirez.com/news/172
38.
▲
by
olejorgenb
3mo ago
Not sure if they are the "inventors", but https://spritz.com/ was where I first saw this ages ago
39.
▲
by
olejorgenb
3mo ago
I'm in the middle of reading this long article, and it's really good IMO! (I usually don't post comments like this, but since there's no comments and the submission is soon completely burried)
40.
▲
by
olejorgenb
3mo ago
Chat control 1.0 "A temporary derogation from the ePrivacy Directive that allowed (but did not require) providers to scan private messages of unsuspected users for potential child sexual abuse material." Does that imply it's
41.
▲
by
olejorgenb
3mo ago
I think the idea is that the images are decrypted by the client. See how Ente does it: https://ente.com/architecture Of course - this sacrifice quite a bit of functionality since more or less all functions which require loo
42.
▲
by
olejorgenb
3mo ago
They said they only want to control one of the ends
43.
▲
by
olejorgenb
3mo ago
Even opus refuse to discuss micro biology for more than a around 15 turns in my experience.
44.
▲
by
olejorgenb
3mo ago
I also see more of these, but I'd say still around half require more click for "reject non-essential"
45.
▲
by
olejorgenb
3mo ago
That would require a tax hike to fund though, which is not very palatable.
46.
▲
by
olejorgenb
3mo ago
And either 80% of banners are not respecting the law, or the law managed to omit mandating making it as easy to reject as accept... Rejecting usually require you to enter into settings and sometimes click "reject" for every indivi
47.
▲
by
olejorgenb
4mo ago
This wasp seems quite specialized towards ticks: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ixodiphagus_hookeri
48.
▲
by
olejorgenb
4mo ago
Isn't this against the ToS though? I don't share my sessions with Anthropic, but I would be happy to share selected sessions to improve an open model.
49.
▲
by
olejorgenb
4mo ago
Off topic, but the other articles are well made too. I enjoyed this one: https://moultano.wordpress.com/2025/02/24/you-should-make-cr...
50.
▲
by
olejorgenb
4mo ago
"This is a good time to spare a thought for our red-green colorblind brethren. [...] it is to them that we owe the beautiful color of green traffic lights. The spectral requirements that make the green signals distinguishable from red
51.
▲
by
olejorgenb
4mo ago
https://archive.ph/rSUKz
52.
▲
by
olejorgenb
4mo ago
> throwing shitload of money to the big actors of a field My reply was directed at this part. Based on my memory seeing ironcalc specifically getting funding. Unless they hide it well they are not a big actor. And the project looks inter
53.
▲
by
olejorgenb
4mo ago
One counter example: https://nextgraph.org/elfa-consortium-encrypted-local-first-... (eg.. https://www.ironcalc.com/ )
54.
▲
by
olejorgenb
4mo ago
The source code is published [1] and there are MIT course videos available [2] (albeit 9 years old...). The source code appear to be primarily in Matlab(!) though. [1] https://github.com/Accla [2] https://ocw.mit
55.
▲
by
olejorgenb
4mo ago
Yes. Isn't that "giant PITA" is referring to here? > your own repo reviewing and merging from upstream as needed. Would be a giant PITA though
56.
▲
by
olejorgenb
4mo ago
Except most of the attacks so far has not landed actually source code changes to git IIRC. They have targeting the release files directly.
57.
▲
by
olejorgenb
4mo ago
pnpm also support this
58.
▲
Andy Matuschak: Apps and programming: two accidental tyrannies (MIT Talk) [video]
(youtube.com)
7 points
by
olejorgenb
5mo ago
|
0 comments
59.
▲
by
olejorgenb
5mo ago
Their transcription (STT) models are good IMO
60.
▲
by
olejorgenb
5mo ago
And the gotcha has been known about since 2014: > This is the class of attack documented by Adnan Khan in 2024. It's not a TanStack-specific bug; it's a known GitHub Actions design issue that requires conscious mitigation. Whil
More ›