Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
okket
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
91.
▲
DNA Sequencing Costs: Data
(genome.gov)
3 points
by
okket
7y ago
|
1 comments
92.
▲
YouTube Criticized After Homophobic Videos Are Allowed to Stay
(rollingstone.com)
1 points
by
okket
7y ago
|
0 comments
93.
▲
During Pride Month, YouTube shows its true colors
(cjr.org)
2 points
by
okket
7y ago
|
0 comments
94.
▲
by
okket
7y ago
Because they perfected the exploitation of Googles search algorithm? Have a look at the site. It is literally a clickbait content farm.
95.
▲
Apple’s $1000 monitor stand is a massive and unnecessary PR fail
(9to5mac.com)
79 points
by
okket
7y ago
|
91 comments
96.
▲
With iOS 13, Apple locks out apps from accessing users private notes in Contacts
(techcrunch.com)
1 points
by
okket
7y ago
|
1 comments
97.
▲
AFP insists raids on ABC and Smethurst were not initiated by Federal Government
(abc.net.au)
2 points
by
okket
7y ago
|
0 comments
98.
▲
Internet disrupted in Sudan amid unrest at Khartoum sit-in
(netblocks.org)
2 points
by
okket
7y ago
|
0 comments
99.
▲
YouTube may allow hate speech if it’s part of a larger argument
(vox.com)
2 points
by
okket
7y ago
|
0 comments
100.
▲
by
okket
7y ago
Previous discussion from 2 years ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14647777 (117 comments)
101.
▲
Kill Sticky Headers
(alisdair.mcdiarmid.org)
2 points
by
okket
7y ago
|
1 comments
102.
▲
Russia strengthens China ties in defiance of bellicose Trump
(ft.com)
3 points
by
okket
7y ago
|
0 comments
103.
▲
YouTube bans neo-Nazi and Holocaust-denial videos in push against hate speech
(arstechnica.com)
2 points
by
okket
7y ago
|
0 comments
104.
▲
by
okket
7y ago
From the Youtube blog post: "To be clear, using racial, homophobic, or sexist epithets on their own would not necessarily violate either of these policies. For example, as noted above, lewd or offensive language is often used in songs
105.
▲
by
okket
7y ago
> To be clear, using racial, homophobic, or sexist epithets on their own would not necessarily violate either of these policies. For example, as noted above, lewd or offensive language is often used in songs and comedic routines. It
106.
▲
Taking a Harder Look at Harassment
(youtube.googleblog.com)
2 points
by
okket
7y ago
|
1 comments
107.
▲
Bowing to pressure, YouTube will reconsider its harassment policies
(theverge.com)
11 points
by
okket
7y ago
|
4 comments
108.
▲
Accretion disk around the Milky Way's black hole has been spotted
(sciencenews.org)
2 points
by
okket
7y ago
|
0 comments
109.
▲
Creating Web Inspector Audits
(webkit.org)
1 points
by
okket
7y ago
|
0 comments
110.
▲
Overlooked No More: Alan Turing, Condemned Code Breaker and Computer Visionary
(nytimes.com)
13 points
by
okket
7y ago
|
1 comments
111.
▲
by
okket
7y ago
If your political view you want to promote is so extreme that no company wants to do business with you, although they legally could and you offer good money, then, yes, probably you have to build your own TelCo or Internet or whatever. Also
112.
▲
Climate change requires government action, not just personal steps
(eu.usatoday.com)
1 points
by
okket
7y ago
|
0 comments
113.
▲
by
okket
7y ago
The [Political] got removed, not by me.
114.
▲
by
okket
7y ago
It's totally ok to not tolerate the extreme intolerant in some places [1]. Again, no laws change, it is just a company telling to very extreme people: Not here. Please go outside. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
115.
▲
by
okket
7y ago
No censorship. You are still free to create your own YouTube clone and publish your extreme political views there. Maybe call it "GabTube"?
116.
▲
by
okket
7y ago
I added it, although the it's on the NYT website.
117.
▲
YouTube to Remove Thousands of Videos Pushing Extreme Views
(nytimes.com)
251 points
by
okket
7y ago
|
683 comments
118.
▲
YouTube Is Finally Banning Nazis, Holocaust Denial, and Sandy Hook Truthers
(vice.com)
23 points
by
okket
7y ago
|
20 comments
119.
▲
DNS and TLS SNI Now with Encryption and Cloud – Bert Hubert (Nluug 23 May 2019)
(youtube.com)
1 points
by
okket
7y ago
|
0 comments
120.
▲
FDA’s accelerated drug approval program is failing to protect cancer patients
(sciencebasedmedicine.org)
1 points
by
okket
7y ago
|
0 comments
More ›