okc

11 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by okc 11y ago

   The point was that people have different perspectives on where the issue is, regardless of what they think about it. To wit: As an English person the debate in housing is heavily based on investment. As an individual I however feel housing
2. 62.▲
   by okc 11y ago

   Like I said, I think we have a similar view. My objection if any, is based on the idea of a risk based portfolio. But it seems you actually mean more generally: savings. All these issues are of course very local. Being English I probably ha
3. 63.▲
   by okc 11y ago

   When someone buys a house to let, they are making property prices more expensive for everyone. I do however agree with you, in essence. But I find it genuinly shocking you that you see a low cost portfolio as the road to ownership. Perhaps
4. 64.▲
   by okc 11y ago

   When a section of society is forced to rent off a richer section of society, then you have a self perpetuating financial inequality - a poverty trap. For people in poverty, house ownership isn't a financial option. Giving poorer peopl
5. 65.▲
   Google search tax conspiracy(dailymail.co.uk)

   2 points by okc 11y ago|0 comments