ok123456

17 ms·

361.
by ok123456 1y ago
You tuck the wire along the headliner with an interior tool. It's about 10 minutes of work.
362.
by ok123456 2y ago
Call your existing ML models across the stack "AI," and wow him by reporting that you already are "AI"-first!
363.
by ok123456 2y ago
It's not the "Boy Who Cried Wolf." It's pointing out a systematic anti-Sino campaign carried out by American-backed NGOs and, in this case, academic mercenaries.
364.
by ok123456 2y ago
Did you read mine?
365.
by ok123456 2y ago
Sorry. It warrants investigation, as the overt and covert consensus from Washington is to smear China and drag us into a "Trade War" that might go into a hot war. We need to be critical at every step. Every instance of the consens
366.
by ok123456 2y ago
Meta owns Instagram, which is still very popular with people who have most of their original teeth.
367.
by ok123456 2y ago
Why does it ONLY happen to political posts, and why does it ONLY happen to posts that reinforce a particular viewpoint? Either this is the design of the black box "algorithm," or it's not real engagement. There's no need
368.
by ok123456 2y ago
Posts from a regional subreddit, where world events seldom happen and traffic and roadways are the prime topics of conversation, are not making it to /r/all or the front page. Yet political posts get +2000 out of nowhere and an in
369.
by ok123456 2y ago
Well, if broadly popular organic posts net about 100, I would expect organic partisan posts to have a ceiling of +50. Still, more realistically, the net would be about zero because half the people would downvote them. But, somehow, partisan
370.
by ok123456 2y ago
I'm amused by how over the top it always is. A high-scoring submission on my local Reddit gets maybe +70 votes. Then, some random political-related submission —and it's only ever political-related—will have +2000 votes. They'
371.
by ok123456 2y ago
There's no nuance with a genocide.
372.
by ok123456 2y ago
> Y’all have gotta give up the TikTok bullshit and read some books. I have a book for you that predates the "TikTok bullshit." It's called "The Fateful Triangle" by Noam Chomsky. He portrays internal Isreali thou
373.
by ok123456 2y ago
The only reason those evergreen moral panics worked is the radio silence from the Biden and Harris campaigns on what concrete things they would do differently if given the chance at another term. Instead, voters were told they were better o
374.
by ok123456 2y ago
So anyone critical of the Gates Foundation for distorting public health priorities through his NGO slush-funds is participating in "far right bullshit" again? This is demagoguery.
375.
by ok123456 2y ago
Ok.
376.
by ok123456 2y ago
The terms NGO-speak or PMC didn't come from some "rightwing information wormhole." These are very real ideas and concepts that average people internally and instinctively revile: they are no longer people but "human reso
377.
by ok123456 2y ago
> But they weren't unresponsive to the actual needs of their voters. Medicare for all? A cease-fire in Gaza and an end to the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians?
378.
by ok123456 2y ago
The Democrats blew it by being unresponsive to their voters' material demands and instead doubling down on hollow NGO speak. They preferred to run issue-free "vibes" campaigns. The same business-industrial class captures them
379.
by ok123456 2y ago
Gates pivoting back to being a "computer genius" reflects how badly his philanthropic reputation laundering operation is going.
380.
by ok123456 2y ago
These April first gags are really tiring.
381.
by ok123456 2y ago
It's an ad hoc text format that is often abused and a last-chance format for interchange. While heuristics can frequently work at determining the structure, they can just as easily frequently fail. This is especially true when dealing
382.
by ok123456 2y ago
The same could be said about tax deductions for charity, which are much more corrosive—they allow billionaires to launder their reputations and money. The random Bitcoin recovered here and there and put into a pool is not even close to the
383.
by ok123456 2y ago
They're not going to spend tax-payer money on crypto—thank God. Instead, they will take seized crypto from criminal activity, which would otherwise be frozen on exchanges or hard drives in evidence lockers, and put it into a reserve po
384.
by ok123456 2y ago
It was wrong when we deported Rosa Luxemburg for perfectly legal speech; this is wrong now.
385.
by ok123456 2y ago
Typically gfortran and intel fortran.
386.
by ok123456 2y ago
Everyone using numpy.
387.
by ok123456 2y ago
Chrome for Enterprise is an add-on for Google Workspaces. How does that work if the companies are separate?
388.
Doge Has Deployed Its GSAi Custom Chatbot for 1,500 Federal Workers(wired.com)
17 points by ok123456 2y ago|4 comments
389.
by ok123456 2y ago
https://github.com/deepseek-ai/smallpond
390.
by ok123456 2y ago
Yes. Any place that required changes or pragmas because of more restrictive semantics should be a warning lamp.

More ›