oh_my_goodness

5 ms·

31.
by oh_my_goodness 4mo ago
>We are not going to see all the houses empty and all the households homeless. ... do you remember 2008? Or no? That was a tiny blip.
32.
by oh_my_goodness 4mo ago
Bruh. This has nothing to do with like Elon coming and taking the house away. This is just plain old reality. Without income or savings, people can't afford houses. How would they pay the property taxes? Can't maintain the house.
33.
by oh_my_goodness 4mo ago
Without jobs, and after our savings run out, we will be homeless people. Then, after that, we can try to bargain for ... whatever homeless people get in this society. It doesn't look like much to me. Call it 'basic income' if
34.
by oh_my_goodness 4mo ago
If anyone else is unlucky enough to be reading this, please just scroll up to see what everyone actually said.
35.
by oh_my_goodness 4mo ago
I'm sorry to say that you don't seem to have read either the thread or my comment. What you bring to the discussion is the straw-man argument that "wealth can be created, not only stolen." Nobody was disputing that. Nobo
36.
by oh_my_goodness 4mo ago
I read the comment chain above. I just went back and read it again. I question whether you've done the same.
37.
by oh_my_goodness 4mo ago
Always the same straw man argument. Nobody here is arguing that wealth can't be created.
38.
by oh_my_goodness 4mo ago
I support doctors. They're doing great work. I understand that in today's US I probably should have said that explicitly, as many Americans seem to have joined the side of the cancer, viruses, etc., and now oppose doctors (or even
39.
by oh_my_goodness 4mo ago
It does fly off sometimes in the game.
40.
by oh_my_goodness 4mo ago
I'm ok that they left that part out.
41.
by oh_my_goodness 4mo ago
In my comment I pointed out that "5 years" was a bit of an exaggeration compared to the results in the article (6 months). That seemed unfortunate to me. To me 5 years seems much better than 6 months.
42.
by oh_my_goodness 4mo ago
Unfortunately in this particular case people die about 6 months later, not 5 years. See the article.
43.
by oh_my_goodness 4mo ago
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S2-C3-1/...
44.
by oh_my_goodness 4mo ago
A count of people.
45.
by oh_my_goodness 4mo ago
>a lot of the most difficult to treat cancers are now far more treatable, and in the next 1-5 years clinical trials will tell us which cancers this particular drug works well for, Can you help disambiguate this? Are there treatments now,
46.
by oh_my_goodness 4mo ago
Still, if the code for multiple similar games is in the training data, then that's worth thinking about.
47.
by oh_my_goodness 4mo ago
Wait until you see the enshittification phase.
48.
by oh_my_goodness 5mo ago
Oh hell no. That's horrible.
49.
by oh_my_goodness 5mo ago
I kind of hate it when people "explain" what happens in Alzheimer's disease. Because we actually don't know that.
50.
by oh_my_goodness 5mo ago
I agree it's not a strange find. Because fossils. But then what was the big deal about finding it? Remember, the same author says "I found a seashell in the middle of the desert!" "shouldn't be here" and "
51.
by oh_my_goodness 5mo ago
Glad to hear about the book. I'll check it out. It would be interesting to read the author's opinions. Otherwise I don't understand (yet) what point you're making. Who claimed that S.O. "merely got worse?" I s
52.
by oh_my_goodness 5mo ago
"We"?
53.
by oh_my_goodness 5mo ago
We all knew it was insane to let one company monopolize search. We knew.
54.
by oh_my_goodness 5mo ago
We don't know what human brains do.
55.
by oh_my_goodness 5mo ago
We know that LLMS "just interpolate" their training data. Maybe there's a mystery about what "just interpolate" means when the data set gets enormous. But we know what LLMs do.
56.
by oh_my_goodness 5mo ago
Is this dry humor and/or a deliberate attempt to make the reader even more horrified by the experiment? Or only a different sensibility from mine? No judgement. I just really can't tell.
57.
by oh_my_goodness 5mo ago
The pervious comment includes '/s' and appears to be a complaint about internet 'experts'.
58.
by oh_my_goodness 5mo ago
The article walks through the logic. Briefly, wide adoption of the ideology expressed in that Davos declaration ("you can't make us obey laws if we're online") enabled the lawbreakers you mention (corporations violating
59.
by oh_my_goodness 6mo ago
Who complained about bringing up the foul stuff that goes on outside the US?
60.
by oh_my_goodness 7mo ago
In my opinion Christensen wasn't talking about outsourcing your entire development process to a competitor with much deeper pockets, giving them the ability to turn off your development at will [1], and then running rings around them.

More ›