ofjcihen

11 ms·

241.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
I’m a cybersecurity researcher. Article seemed fine to me and echos a lot of me and my colleagues concerns. If you did regular malware analysis you would see that these groups already have access to LLMs that they’re using for development.
242.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
Some of the latest versions of Shai Hulud do this. Worked a contract recently where they were having AI check packages for obfuscation before admitting them into Artifactory but had vibed up the logic and it failed open. So in other words t
243.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
> I don't think anyone is worried about today's models being a serious threat Fable is essentially bricked for my areas of interest (even being a member of the cybersecurity program). It seems like they’re attempting to sell re
244.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
I mean it’s pretty tame and actually adds to the conversation. It feels somewhat obvious that someone just disagreed and flagged it. Is there a system for holding people accountable who abuse flags?
245.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
What you say is true but completely ignores the obvious ways in which what he is proposing benefits his company. Its like saying it’s normal for a taxi driver to drive people places while he’s got you handcuffed in the trunk.
246.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
N+1. This is my experience and for the most part the people that I work with share the same feeling. A highly enthusiastic concussion enthusiast with 10 hands is how one person put it. These are people in different fields but highly accompl
247.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
Can we not open up every article talking to working professionals as if they’re children? I like to stay up to date on things but more and more I’m finding myself pointing codex at a URL and saying “get to the point”.
248.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
Incident Response
249.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
This X a 1000. I work in IR for small to medium sized business. The past few years have seen my business increase well beyond what I can reasonably handle and my bank account feels like a dragons pile of gold. I will always always be on the
250.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
The issue he highlights is purely number driven here. His predictions timing sucks but he’s right in pointing out the insane numbers involved. I think AI is a wonderful tool but I also think that there are many wonderful tools that if we be
251.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
I think you might have meant to reply to the parent comment.
252.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
You’ve managed to contradict yourself between your 1st and 2nd sentence. I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make. The argument is regarding LLMs and domain knowledge.
253.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
Got flagged for pointing this out. He’s essentially telling this guy that he wishes he had been executed.
254.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
If I was working with someone who had experience in the specific industry then yes, that is in fact what I would do. If I plucked a random passerby and gave them the task then no, I’d find myself detailing out every specific to them. You’re
255.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
It still does not rise the standard he requires which your response indicated would be easy for the model to achieve with a simple prompt. Additionally, using a specific tool does not suddenly give the model common sense enough to say “this
256.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
This is akin to “don’t make mistakes” “Verify all facts and compliance requirements” leaves enormous holes even if you assume the LLM has a concept of facts and requirements (it does not). What facts? What requirements? For what industry? F
257.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
I interpreted hooked to mean “the degradation of skills has made it significantly harder to transition back to doing things with auto-complete/by hand”. Could be wrong though.
258.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
Maybe they’re communicating exactly what it sounds like and are just owning up to being complete morons?
259.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
I echo almost all of your points daily and it’s incredibly refreshing to see a level-headed response like this. Tbf I think this is probably the way most people see it at the moment from my discussions with others. The static comes from peo
260.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
I know you’re defending your work here but this behavior does absolutely nothing to help your point.
261.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
Ah yes, the well traveled and highly tested human mission to Mars.
262.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
It also doesn’t help that the middle of the road, realistic reaction to it is “it’s aight” and that’s just not a discussion worthy response.
263.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
Oh the irony.
264.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
> that I would not have written otherwise I think this is the part I struggle with. The code I write makes me money or is a way of teaching me something, both of which are reasons that I would write the code regardless. I don’t think I h
265.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
Can you share some examples that you would say justify that price? Not a gotcha, I’m genuinely curious where you’re seeing a return at that level.
266.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
Running hundreds of agents overnight is almost certainly 99 percent waste.
267.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
The most intelligent person involved in the highest level projects at my current company introduces themselves as an out of work circus clown. There is an incredible amount of competency signaled by someone who was given access to this mode
268.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
Models hosted or used by the government. You left out the part containing the “barrels of money” incentive.
269.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
Maintainers aren’t infallible. Could he have been nicer? Sure. But we don’t need to walk on eggshells around maintainers. That’s stupid and inefficient.
270.
by ofjcihen 5mo ago
You could also say that about using dismissive language like “normies”. Regarding it reaching the front page: is it possible that’s because others feel the same way about a software they might use daily for important work? Trite as the gh i

More ›