ofjcihen

8 ms·

91.
by ofjcihen 2mo ago
OpenAIs response: https://openai.com/index/apple-is-getting-this-wrong/ Personally, this reads a bit ridiculous in the face of what Apple is claiming but time will tell.
92.
by ofjcihen 2mo ago
I don’t know, we saw where that led and I’m not interested in becoming a pool of orange tang yet.
93.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
This is becoming such a common statement on here it’s almost copy pasta. Maybe the answer is more along the lines of “people are using them for different things and getting different results”? Why does it have to be snark and “these people
94.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
They did get better around that time but there are some things that they are legitimately bad at for now.
95.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
What makes you say that? Not dunking, I skimmed it (I’m in no way at this level) and didn’t see anything outright Claud-y.
96.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
Or maybe, just maybe, other people have different opinions than you? Is that possible or is everyone else too common to have those?
97.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
What’s the one piece of advice everyone sells but you think should be free?
98.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
> except for fiber, which I don't care enough about to track.
99.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
There are a metric boatload of these visualizations created to accompany history texts etc. AI for image generation is great but I’m struggling to figure out why you would ever use this if it’s confined to satellite imagery.
100.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
I quite literally, right at this moment, am sitting next to a friend who is a doctor with a focus on nutrition and they are saying that whoever told you that fiber doesn’t matter is going against almost all of the modern understanding of he
101.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
People are trying to tell you something that can literally save your life. Colon cancer rates are increasing at a breakneck pace. Chill with the snark for a second and realize you may not be the smartest person in every room.
102.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
Why is this your first thought? And then why voice it?
103.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
Did you just Google Camus, see Renaud Camus and think that was Albert Camus’ nickname? Or are you just trolling?
104.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
That’s a very adult response. There are definitely some times that it feels that way though. I find that over employed devs tend to need a lot of hand holding.
105.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
Cybersecurity does indeed work closely with HR and legal. Especially cybersecurity consultants in the IR space like me. You didn’t answer my question.
106.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
This has been going on since people have been committing AWS keys to GitHub and is nothing new. You could famously commit some keys and then have crypto miners in your account in 5 minutes. Sure the AI can translate “exploit this” into an e
107.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
I think the article is more about the cost for AI companies like OAI and Anthropic to operate relative to what they’re making (not much). So in a way your argument that users are able to spend 10k in tokens while paying a sub of 200 is actu
108.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
You apparently find any comment with so much as a hint of disagreement as “arrogant and condescending”. Why participate on a public forum if that’s how you’re going to react?
109.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
I’m glad you have the context of my profession as a security professional. Part of my client base is very interested in those working multiple jobs and breaching contracts. So help me reconcile this: >Explain to me how working 3 remote j
110.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
No. In fact the opposite. I’m happy that people are willing to question things in the face of unbridled optimism. Your comment dismissing the people working on actually figuring out what the models are doing as “not-doers” included. Some ar
111.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
>Kambhampati, as it turns out, is interested in doing exactly that. “I’m not negative. I just sound negative because everybody else is way too positive,” he said. “In science, you have to actually understand what the current thing does a
112.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
Or they could, you know, put some very basic logical safeguards in place to prevent their “super duper dangerous” AI from trying to hack real targets. You know, just real incredibly basic things you do when you’re pentesting with scanning t
113.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
The real lesson here is still the boy who cried wolf. They’ve played this game for years. I have no reason to believe their worries are real now.
114.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
Right? 100% this is them trying to make gold out of turds.
115.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
“I can’t stop doing x because I got myself into x and if I quit doing the x I agreed to do despite my apprehension about x then I could go to jail. But guys we should really slow down doing x.” Unless the only thing he’s asking for is for h
116.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
Past everything. Even the CEO is leveraged up to his neck in personal debt at this point.
117.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
Absolutely take a screenshot of this and your prior charges and dispute this with your bank.
118.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
Sounds more like the risk is on Hover then and not on the customer. If you advertise 38 dollars to me for a product you source from someone else and that the producer suddenly charges 100x the price you can’t just charge me that price becau
119.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
Who said I was referencing the Hindenburg? They had a ton of fundamental problems despite seeming like a good idea at first. It was only after we started using them did we realize they weren’t actually as good of an idea as they seemed.
120.
by ofjcihen 3mo ago
I mean Zeppelins were supposed to be the premier form of air travel despite the glaringly obvious issues. Invoking “heliocentrism” is the HN version of “Ive already drawn you as the virgin and me as the Chad.”

More ›