Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
oezi
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
37 ms
·
691.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
China isn't better. They just do colonialism 2.0 with their investments and debt-based diplomacy. The don't care one bit about a single African life.
692.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
Ouch, I thought it was 1.95 per month...
693.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
Getting to netzero is most economically achieved using solar, wind and battery storage + gas peaker plants for intermittent capacity needs (already today and more so in the future).
694.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
"those in power" is just a strayman. We don't need a revolution but pragmatic people. If US Congress wasn't red, we would be moving considerable faster in the right direction.
695.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
Expect for instance mass extinction and an increased natural catastrophies?
696.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
We need 2-6% of GDP each year spend on this. For the next 30 years. This is an amount of money we could just create by monetary policy or Quantitative Easing as the like to say. Nobody needs to get poor when money is spend.
697.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
Counterpoint once Co2 reduction is in place and the norm (as with Wind and solar) it becomes hard to go back to other ways of doing things.
698.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
The only solution is money! And it isn't so expensive to turn things around. An estimated 100-200% in global GDP is needed to reach carbon net zero by 2050. Annually we need to spend 2-6% of GDP to get there. Remember every bit of Co2
699.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
Doesn't the 42bn USD of the film industry include longtail and licensing?
700.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
What? You as the shareholder own the earnings and their use. Earnings thus either become dividends or become re-invested or are used to buy back shares. P/E is the central metric by which to judge stocks on a fundamental level.
701.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
No European country restricts where you can drink (to my knowledge). Only what things you can do when drunk.
702.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
The infrastructure spending is indeed mind boggling, but I have the feeling similar to their real estate glut that they are building too low quality and are making a grave mistake in this because they will be stuck with this infrastructure
703.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
While I am thankful that Signal exists and is a considerate of privacy concerns I don't think their decisions are always right. For instance, I would love to see picture sent to me by my spouse automatically saved to camera roll. Signa
704.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
If we assume double productivity we could also foresee a future where we get double the amount of high quality movies produced for the same amount of money. Productions would be more viable even on smaller budgets. Could be nice for consume
705.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
Counterpoint: the operators and engineers failed to develop designs which are safe and commercially viable. The actual cost of Nuclear has exceeded all reasonable levels. The continued subsidies would have been much better spent on developi
706.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
1kwp panels cost <200 USD at the moment.
707.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
> which is about the same cost as the levelized cost of solar or wind in France As of 2024. Remember that solar and wind are still on a downward price trajectory and the reduced investment in Nuclear has meant that the prices to up. So i
708.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
I would be in favor of a fee that is 1024 * 2^n USD where n is the nth year you want to keep the patent. 1st year = 2000 USD 10th year = 1m USD per year 20th year = 1bn USD per year It becomes prohibitively expensive if you don't use i
709.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
Most of the costs are acquisition cost which is squarely due to the Ukraine war.
710.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
The 4 last old nuclear plants which were switched off last year wouldn't have been switched to coal if it wasn't for Putin's war of aggression in Ukraine. Coal in Germany will end in 2030 anyway and the renewables are built a
711.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
Consensus is their core strength.
712.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
Peaker generation isn't that expensive. Because you have almost no fuel cost.
713.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
The W/$ is trending down aligned with log of volume. If there wasn't volume then there wouldn't have been a price drop and vice versa. The Germans pay but it is most internally circulating money. The Afd vote is mostly a vote
714.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
Much of the prices originate from the solar more than 10 years ago. The prices were much different then. But the subsidies arguably jump started some of the global solar industry.
715.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
Asmodee is hedgefund-owned French board game company. Drive by the injected money they have been 'consolidating' the board game publishing industry. For instance they bought the rights for Settler of Catan. A lot of people fear th
716.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
You are making it out to be an insurmountable challenge and reject what we are have already achieved. Cost-parity renewables being the most impressive feat. Global treaties such as Paris are a second.
717.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
Why are you saying this. We just need to get to netzero. This is going to cost some money but it won't break the bank. Estimates go up to 2x global GDP.
718.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
TFA explains this. As models got better and CO2 rose more and more it was realized that the old models lacked important aspects of cloud reflectivity.
719.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
Fatalism isn't helping it. There are things which can be done and which are being done. Do your part of avoiding disaster.
720.
▲
by
oezi
3y ago
I have wondered for some time if short term in-balance in fossil fuel supply capacity (oil tankers and pipelines) could help renewables along significantly. Let's say an environmental organization would buy 10 oil tankers and would int
More ›