oelmekki

84 ms·

721.
by oelmekki 14y ago
They could be using http streaming, like the feature introduced in rails 3.1 : http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2011/4/18/why-http-streaming/ That actually makes <head> the preferred place for loading scripts. Also, I find it a bit e
722.
by oelmekki 14y ago
Those numbers are totally wrong. First, "pigeon"s don't talk about 80% but 60%. And they're wrong about that too. Here is an economical review from the law (translated from french) : http://goo.gl/70xwI The tax is not 60%, but 40%, worst
723.
by oelmekki 14y ago
> FB isn't in the business of hosting videos so why should a p2p social network be? Remember that the whole point of using P2P social network was to avoid centralized service and keep control of one data.
724.
by oelmekki 14y ago
There is a very good reason peer to peer social networks can't work nowadays (not even considering diaspora quality). It's not about internet overlords. It's not about ad industry pressure. It's not about governments pressure. It's about in
725.
by oelmekki 14y ago
I really like the concept developed in one of the comments (I can reuse it here, right ?) of evolutionary vs revolutionary. Further than the "previous art" rule, that should be a criteria in accepting new patents : is it revolutionary ? Yes
726.
by oelmekki 14y ago
> They're perfectly happy with the speed at which they can edit text and that's fine. I think they miss the point. Speed editing with vim is not about how many lines you may produce in the day. It's about the lag between the moment you
727.
by oelmekki 14y ago
disclaimer : I don't use scaffolding either Well, scaffolds are not suppose to totally avoid coding. They try to provide what you may write again and again, but you're supposed to take that as a basis, not a final product.
728.
by oelmekki 14y ago
> it's somewhat understandable in the context of a site that unintentionally goes public before it's ready Sorry, but no. There is absolutely no good reason while creating an user controller - even when writing the very first lines - to
729.
by oelmekki 14y ago
This is not a classic security problem causing a "woops" on border line case. This is a failure to implement 101 basic feature. I know it's hard for people behind this company and they probably invested a lot of time and love to build this
730.
by oelmekki 14y ago
Hilarous. Great job, writing team, now I want to buy this magazine.
731.
by oelmekki 14y ago
Especially when you conclude with a troll-esque affirmation like "we are root on your system anyway".
732.
by oelmekki 14y ago
Totally agree. Plus, I'm not sure users are asking for it that much. It's been years since I have magnatune tab in amarok, I never used it. Paid services, gtfo my applications. I know where you are if I need you.
733.
by oelmekki 14y ago
Yep, I'm aware of the prior art rule, except : a) it's about things that should have been actually used, where a patent is about concepts b) scope of the idea is not clearly defined and so could be argued with, when a real patent definition
734.
by oelmekki 14y ago
That's a valid point. I still don't understand why there is no (afaik) "general public patent" mechanism of some kind : a procedure to make someone claim a patent on behalf of general public. This would certainly stops patent trolls, and av
735.
by oelmekki 14y ago
EDIT : nevermind, wrong assumption, see replies. I'm not sure there's a problem here. The article seems to imply the guy actually edited wikipedia home page to promote his client. For what I understand of how "did you know" section works, i
736.
by oelmekki 14y ago
My thought exactly. I found this sentence causing extreme concern.
737.
by oelmekki 14y ago
Thanks. After reading the post, I turned my prompt into that : https://gist.github.com/648a75ec821acff10749 which looks like that : http://i.imgur.com/Qc86I.png I like having an uri directly pastable to scp. Also, as mentioned in other
738.
by oelmekki 14y ago
I defenitely like the "make previous return status obvious" thing. Will use that idea in my prompt, thanks.
739.
by oelmekki 14y ago
I've build a few LFS systems, knowing for sure I won't use it as a primary system. Nevermind : it's great for educational purpose, and I'm surely more confident in my sysadmin skills since I've did it.
740.
by oelmekki 14y ago
That would definitely not be a stealthy scan :)
741.
by oelmekki 14y ago
> is there a way for bots (in particular, mechanize in perl/python) to also download those files? The point was mostly that if it is not downloaded, then it's a bot (or any non-browser getter, at least), not that it's not a bot if it do
742.
by oelmekki 14y ago
Or to report the tax payment to the day some corrective law makes the item possible to sell, should it happens. Of course, there can be an immediate arrangement if they just give away the item to a museum.
743.
by oelmekki 14y ago
Wait... dependency on querySelectorAll ? Weren't the point of javascript libraries to be crossbrowser ?
744.
by oelmekki 15y ago
You can already do that : you can choose to only display toolbox window, and then add tabs (like a layer tab) in the toolbox window.
745.
by oelmekki 15y ago
I like having only my image on screen. With multi-window mode, you can press the tab key to make tools windows appear/disappear. When you're used to change tools via keyboard shortcut (and thus, don't need tools window most of the time), it
746.
by oelmekki 15y ago
Same here, wasn't sure seeing no reference to github.com in mails' header, even if the link pointed directly on their domain. i guess that's the precise moment when I should feel too much paranoid.
747.
by oelmekki 15y ago
Quite perturbing fact is that only those two techcrunch related domains seems to be pointing on that host : http://www.bing.com/search?q=ip%3A70.32.92.201&go=&q...