Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
oehpr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
25 ms
·
211.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
One thing to keep in mind is the context you're observing this in. Imagine instead, someone makes a post on https://www.reddit.com/r/DIY/ about how they connected some glass panels together and shipped them i
212.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
It's possible to make it work, you just need a little incentivisation. Private trackers are extremely durable and performant, and their secret sauce is just giving users a reputation to uphold.
213.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
As a side note regarding the money: My understanding is they had formed a studio to make a deep faked movie some time ~2019? I think? But covid rolled around and the studio dissolved. They took advantage of the contacts and assets they had
214.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
It feels a little onerous for me to lay out the a privacy advocates argument from first principles. I'd presume if umvi had rejected the groundwork reasons for privacy, they would have made a comment more like: "What bad thing are
215.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
Yes. And why do you think I'm not upset about that dataset?
216.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
A piece of data on its own is usually pretty harmless, a gigantic database that is organized, categorized, and distributed, is potentially very harmful. And it's a smooth gradient between them. An example of data that is harmless on it
217.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
I feel like, ideally, such a system of incentivizing novel ideas and information should be decentralized. Bug bounties, for example, is a decentralized form of incentivizing public works.
218.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
I don't agree that's a non sequitur. We typically sell "access" to the idea, even though the supply of access is infinite. If you want to account for human labor and cost, then you're describing novel ideas, not &qu
219.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
Agreed. This argument about DRM and software rights and redistribution finds its roots in the failure of markets to distribute products that have infinite supply once they are created. Call it an "Idea Product". Information can on
220.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
I think that it's not that there is no norms, it's that there's no point in having norms. These attack ads are conducted by proxies, not the interested parties themselves. It takes more energy to go after them then it takes f
221.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
Hey if you're looking to try writing some simple forth code in a fun context I recommend you try playing grobots http://grobots.sourceforge.net/ I recommend you do the basics of the tutorial, then watching some matches
222.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
Out of curiosity how long did you have it for? Because voting reform can not fix the damage of a legacy of FPTP the moment it is instituted, it's going to take 4 or 5 elections before 1. the public figures out how it works 2. parties s
223.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
It deeply frustrates me to see essays like this written without saying in big bold words at the top "Id take almost anything over fptp" People not deeply familiar with the voting system world see this stuff and think to themselves
224.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
Hey this is great! I've been looking for a decent poll site like this! Some things I would like: Could you randomize the initial order to avoid donkey votes? I'd like it if there was an option to allow invited participants to add
225.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
That was the intent of the bloom filter. Configured properly it would actively filter out the need to endlessly send the server requests like "Hey, have anything for this hash?" However I suppose that if the site does have comme
226.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
Well... I mean really I was not trying to say Gab was innocent. I really didn't know until others provided some helpful context. I was speaking more to the original topic of this HN submission. I never know how to handle topic shifts i
227.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
nope, you'd simply distribute a bloom filter to everyone, and then you could transmit hashed urls. you could easily make this privacy safe.
228.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
Fair. By my own admission, I don't know much about gab. I think the first time I ever heard about it was when Firefox banned Dissenter from their addons. Dissenter to me was a genius idea that has an ugly userbase. I'd love to hav
229.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
I've got to finish going through The Culture series. I thought it was bold stroke to write a book series about a future where humans are domesticated by their own AI.
230.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
I'm not deeply versed in Gab's history... But lets hypothetically say that Gab was not created for that purpose, but for precisely the purpose it claims it was created for: To be an open platform for free speech, no censorship. Wo
231.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
They're not unique in this behavior. Basically every political subreddit that exists, and even some that arn't innately political but get taken over, do the same thing. I remember there were a bunch of posts in /r/zerowa
232.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
> manual sponsored data Ha! Clever. I like this angle. I agree I would have no problem with that. > But if manual sponsored data is allowed, it is then hard to make the case that it is bad to allow ISPs to facilitate it by offering a
233.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
I found it was pretty clear, but rereading it, I realized I implicitly corrected a grammatical error. > Those issues usually aren't that big they couldn't be calmly discussed if only they didn't reflect on should read >
234.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
Can you detail your procedure here? I just attempted this and I can't see any advertisements. on firefox and chromium I searched these phrases without adblock and saw no ads macbook repair vancouver macbook repair calgary macbo
235.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
I'm... actually shocked to hear this. You're a UX designer. a User Experience designer. User Experience is your profession. And you're telling me: JIRA, the application with massively nested hierarchical layouts and a 2 secon
236.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
That guy sounds pretty high energy. For some odd reason our profession has no short supply of people with social... quirks. BTW. I've been doing some investigation of Zulip since it showed up on hacker news, and I think it is much bett
237.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
I get where you're coming from here. Ideally your co-worker would, when initiating a conversation, write a well formatted preamble that covers everything they need from you. I have to say however, that this form of paragraph writing be
238.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
"And if you manage to get a human on the other side they usually have a timer and if you dare to type your reply longer than 30 seconds they will just drop your session at any arbitrary moment with a comment "user didn't resp
239.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
a "Virtual meetup platform" confused me. I signed up thinking this was a platform where my coworkers could meet up to discuss things, an alternative to meet or zoom. But this is actually a premium access streaming platform. You se
240.
▲
by
oehpr
6y ago
Reviews are fuzzy measurements that humans interpret as individual, independent , samples. When you go to the reviews section, your perception is that these reviews are uncorrelated. Correlated reviews are less meaningful, they provide les
More ›