Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
oblio
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
121.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
In today's episode: "Programmers frustrated that they're being treated like craftspeople or delivery drivers or factory workers, etc, etc."
122.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
> RPI loop What's that?
123.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
Or we could invest in a ton of other non AI related research we're underinvesting in.
124.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
That's training during training. They can't learn afterwards.
125.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
It's worse. It's in Google's interest to auction ad spots at the highest price. That's it. Nothing else matters. The content needs to be vaguely legal, the quality or any other product feature doesn't matter. Anothe
126.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
I forget that, too. But if my partner tells me they're allergic to shellfish, I'm not going to order oysters for them tonight. See the difference?
127.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
In my experience all those claims are false. So the next step is to ask for evidence and ideally independent and peer reviewed research.
128.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
Latin, not Sanskrit. Heck, ask ChatGPT where the name comes from :-)
129.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
It's basically impossible to pick a word that doesn't mean something unintended in 20+ major languages in the world. The recent OpenAI model names are obviously based on Latin: Luna (Moon), Terra (Earth), Sol (Sun), Astra (Star).
130.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
> What does this even mean. There is strong evidence of LLMs doing in context learning. 1. Is this learning persistent? 2. Do they verify these new lessons against core principles? 3. Do they and protect themselves/ignore requests i
131.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
Yet I can't randomly order another person to steal a car for me, just because I tell them to. Alignment for an intelligent system is a hard problem and at this stage is seems close to unsolvable. My guess is that we'll just ignore
132.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
Brilliant. We keep pretending LLMs learn. No, they're smart idiots/stupid geniuses. They're turn based intelligence in a real time world. 1. Each time someone talks to me they don't have to repeat the entire conversation
133.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
> I didn't know he'd had a long history of mispredicting AI quality and growth of companies like Microsoft and Google. After watching this space for a long time, I think the growth angle is... untested. All the FAANGs were slow
134.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
Ummm... GenZ have mostly grown with mobile apps, which are generally not JS.
135.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
> I think this is fine as long as the success criteria are strict enough that they are forced to learn something in the end. They are fired, get promoted to management, or learn the technical aspects.
136.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
People gotta eat.
137.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
This is fine, but software also needs maintenance, especially security updates. If we have an explosion of new software without the corresponding increase in maintenance work - very likely from clients that pay peanuts for software - the wo
138.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
I know they're trying. Trying is not the same as succeeding, which was my point.
139.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
Downvoters: am I wrong or do you just not like what I'm saying?
140.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
What forges are we talking about here? None of them have Github competitors.
141.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
Like Uber replaced all drivers with self driving cars [1] in its 20 years of operation? Just because I want to paint the moon pink, doesn't mean it's feasible. [1] If anything, Waymo has a higher chance and global Waymo adoption i
142.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
Isn't Cursor owned by xAI ergo Grok?
143.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
DMCA? Which is actually an American law enforced globally? Enforcement ultimately happens through law and the legal system.
144.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
If it's super intelligent... Won't I be left behind anyway?!?
145.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
> Probably the ones we collectively value as human and are willing to pay for (in either our time or money or both). Society seems to be very bad at that, and we end up with high frequency traders making millions while teachers are paid
146.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
That's assuming absolutely 0 cost for reviewing and merging what ultimately are low value PRs.
147.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
There can be a point of divergence when even humans can't merge things anymore, so I highly doubt that experience is universal.
148.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
Scale matters. If people do it, it's maybe 10 PRs like that per month. With AI there could be hundreds per day.
149.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
> And of course they're doing the same for Apple/Safari, which wouldn't survive without the $20 million default search engine placement deal. Billion with a B, as in 10 zeroes, not 7.
150.
▲
by
oblio
1mo ago
> If anything FF gets left out because usage is so low. I've been following this for a long time. They were leaving Firefox out when its usage wasn't low. Probably the typical backdoor executive mandate that led to death by &qu
More ›