oaiey

56 ms·

961.
by oaiey 5y ago
This whole release was very smooth with nice features and nice performance improvements. But the amount of (mostly wrong) negative articles and comments is amazing. It was not like that with .NET 5 and before. HN community grew more hostile
962.
by oaiey 5y ago
To be straight: I also do not like the new templates. Thinking only newbies is not the right thing. But there language features i like
963.
by oaiey 5y ago
They release in the same cadence roughly. The difference is they are no longer grindlocked in Windows, VS and bad patterns. Result: less cloud costs by better performance, capability to run on Linux, lambdas, containers and ability to stay
964.
by oaiey 5y ago
- Install .NET 6 - dotnet new console - VS Code - Install C# Plugin - Start writing code - dotnet build Also works for the big brother C#
965.
by oaiey 5y ago
I have one core problem with most of the critique here and in the article: show me a 20 year old framework which does better! Python: which version again, PHP: good luck not doing a kind of injection, Java: Beans? spring? Maven? Gradle?, Ja
966.
by oaiey 5y ago
Try minimal apis. Is not nancyfx archived?
967.
by oaiey 5y ago
The .NET team has their reasons. Before they were bound with the hip to visual studio. That time is over and freed them to do bigger things!
968.
by oaiey 5y ago
I felt the same way ... But when you look in DSL experiences like SwiftUI their global/implicit usings and other SDK experiences it is actually also benefitial for other cases.
969.
by oaiey 5y ago
This is so not true. It is the opposite of a clusterfuck. The old ASP.NET was a clusterfuck. It has a excellent server (kestrel), a middleware pipeline, routing system and common dispatching patterns like pages, MVC or minimal apis. It is e
970.
by oaiey 5y ago
I like alternatives to GitHub/GitLab, 0 JS is also nice. But a bit more styling I would appreciate ;)
971.
by oaiey 5y ago
Three things: community, community, community. Be friendly to the people. If they contribute, make sure you get their stuff released quickly. Attribute them in the release not es, your readme. Respect and gratitude. Be open for ideas.
972.
by oaiey 5y ago
That is market specific. Cannot answer for the UK.
973.
by oaiey 5y ago
I played around recently with Blazor (the WASM app model). It is awesome regards productivity. Just a bit heavy to load ;)
974.
by oaiey 5y ago
Yeah .. but there is one aspect in this argumentation: C# is everywhere a reasonable contender. So while you rarely get a dominant position (Unity and Backends) you get a lot of second places (Apps, Desktop, ...) which complement your full
975.
by oaiey 5y ago
Legacy exists in every company and platform older than some years. You either do the business of brownfield jobs or not. Every platform has their ugly history .. they just call them differently: SOAP/WS, RMI, CORBA, 2to3, PHP4, jQuery,
976.
by oaiey 5y ago
Static interface members enabling generic math and other cool features slipped the C# 10 quality bar. That is why the release looks a bit thin. But honestly, with file scoped namespaces and global usings ... there is enough to see.
977.
by oaiey 5y ago
ASP.NET Core is an excellent and high-performance general purpose web framework. Blazor is an excellent C# on the browser stack. And MAUI will target React Native (native controls) and Cordova (Blazor on Maui) at the same time ... which is
978.
by oaiey 5y ago
.NET (Core) 5 is not installed on Windows. Windows comes with .NET Framework 4.x. I think the user interest was startup times of lambdas and containers. Therefore Linux was a priority.
979.
by oaiey 5y ago
Considering that sim cards do a lot (think roaming on cheapest partner etc) .. you can bet that eSIM are equally capable and maybe even more capable.
980.
by oaiey 5y ago
Because most likely he is already somewhere and this other company is not ready yet to share the change of CEO. This case has more than 50% likelihood.
981.
by oaiey 5y ago
I would also say that deployment pipelines have a place inside the portfolio of a public cloud. Not the issue tracking but repo and pipelines. AWS has this as well
982.
by oaiey 5y ago
Simple: gave him too much money and shares.
983.
by oaiey 5y ago
Let us be straight: they effectively made the Azure DevOps (the leftover from the once might Team Foundation Server) a weak product to further foster GitHub. So when this team brought some tech over, that just means, they are now working fo
984.
by oaiey 5y ago
Thomas' own blog sounded a bit like he was the special task manager. So do not read too much into this 4 months.
985.
by oaiey 5y ago
I think Microsoft was well aware that they had to run GitHub differently. And then they found the right manager idling around.
986.
by oaiey 5y ago
Seems like they promoted the chief product officer. Seems like exactly the person who delivered this.
987.
by oaiey 5y ago
Aside that Nat came from Microsoft, they made already tons of changes to GitHub. Both for the Enterprise and for the public open source. I do not see any indication about that being bound to a contract. They are also promoting the chief pro
988.
by oaiey 5y ago
It is not unprofessional to quit. It can be unprofessional how you quit and behave till your last day. It is your life. They do not own it.
989.
by oaiey 5y ago
Same with .NET. The stunt Microsoft pulled a week ago made me think that .NET needs a OpenJDK-like model ... until I realized that without the 200 devs from Microsoft no one will care enough to continue developing .NET. Surprised that Java
990.
by oaiey 5y ago
VS Code and language servers have leveled the game a lot. Regular Editing is pretty much on par. Debugging and diagnostic they are still strong.

More ›