Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
o1y32
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
151.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
"support" means that user needs to explicitly do something (add as an "app") before you can get notifications which is not as easy as in the app
152.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
"the benefit is its performance" Sure, but when you design a language you are striking a balance between many things (which is why some features could take years to finalize and implement). In this case, the gain in performance is
153.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
You have confused HN population with general US population
154.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
Sorry to break the news, that's not going to happen in the foreseeable future.
155.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
I don't understand why this is an article and why this shows up on hacker news at all. Other languages have been doing this for a long time as well. And there is no "secret" "kept" by anyone.
156.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
At the end of each article "Follow me on Twitter or Mastodon, or get my newsletter." No, I'm not kidding, it's there. That is exactly why we come to this website to "opt out" of things, right?
157.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
To me, the "casual blog post" format is a turn off, and I don't think the website is effective at all. Instead of random advice showing up in random posts that read like stories, the website needs simple, succinct and highly
158.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
Why do you bother to write such a long, meaningless comment when other free/paid password managers are easily available? What's the point and what are you advocating for?
159.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
Read some Wikipedia pages instead of coming up your own version of the world history.
160.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
Typical tech nerd way of thinking things. "Implementation appears year ahead" does not mean anything. What matters is whether the product can gain enough attraction to be a successful business, which we don't know yet.
161.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
Apple "has"? Hey the device is not even released and there is nothing like a preorder number that can tell a story. Please just be more mindful of the facts here. Your own speculation is simply meaningless.
162.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
I quit reddit a while ago and found it very rewarding. I used to argue with people all the time -- yes under subreddits like r/ProgrammerHumor because I disagree with other people's opinions or because their technical understandin
163.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
LOL whatever the author says Microsoft would not care about a single bit about it. Microsoft knew many years ago this is a difficult product to develop, and they stopped putting significant amount of effort into it. Microsoft probably expec
164.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
I mean, nobody is going to get a Mac Pro just for games even if it works...
165.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
Actually you can play these games with Xbox Series S at 1440p easily. I wonder if people would just simply buy a game console (if they don't already have one) for the more demanding titles. Most people don't need a processor that
166.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
Practically speaking a $300 (often sold at $250) Xbox Series S would provide a much better gaming experience than this.
167.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
...if you are in the US. Outside US iPhones are nowhere nearly as popular. In many markets Android phones have about 90% of the market share
168.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
Thanks for saying this. It is getting ridiculous. Apple saying they are doing AR which does not mean anything. If you use the headset as a big "projected computer screen" I doubt people really care if the actual surrounding is the
169.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
Microsoft has a ton of documentation hosted on GitHub, including VSCode, C#, .NET, Visual Studio and many other products. They regularly get pull requests from outsiders which then get merged. At least to me (an outsider) everything works w
170.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
Exactly. I have learned that there is no point trying to tell a Tesla fanboy what the problem is. They will not listen. In the nytimes article, a guy bought another Tesla right after the previous one was totalled because of an FSD error. T
171.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
For those who complain about the headline: if you listen to WSJ's recent podcast episode on Nvidia, parts of it are equality ridiculous and embarrassing. ...but of course it wouldn't matter to people who don't have the techni
172.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
Your comment does not provide any concrete example. Even if what you say is true, access is a real issue. You think homeless people would know how to find those $1000 options if a random person cannot find them via a simple search?
173.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
It does not actually mean much. These chatbots can easily output JavaScript using var where it absolutely should not. It being aware of the latest standards does not mean it can properly use the new syntax or features -- it emits a form of
174.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
It is funny that they actually show gradient in the demo (and some very weird abd ridiculous examples). Serious websites rarely have any gradient background, and this part of the tool is easily replaceable -- there are lots of websites that
175.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
Looks like this is meant for professional web developers to make their life easier. So it is not here to replace wix. So, 1. I am struggling to understand the value proposition of this. Demo is cool but most developers working in an organiz
176.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
Great example. Some private trackers have strict rules about quality, e.g. at most one 720p and at most one 1080p (probably 1080p and 4k nowadays), bitrate must be above a certain threshold, whichever was published first stays, unless there
177.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
We have a small feature that was put together in a rush. It "works", but only works correctly for some simple cases, otherwise there are bugs everywhere. There were very few tests. We must redo the while thing, update the UX and a
178.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
Practically speaking, the TS team wants the language to resemble JS as much as possible and usually avoids completely new syntax, e.g. new expressions. For this reason they haven't added switch expressions even though technically it&#x
179.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
The second paragraph is just simply plain wrong throughout. You should actually learn the web stack and look at how things work in 2023 instead of reading other people's rants or secondhand opinions to form your own opinions. CSS is no
180.
▲
by
o1y32
3y ago
Rust may have helped but I doubt that's the deciding factor. This needs more context
More ›