Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nybble41
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
31 ms
·
211.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
You can flip that argument around, though: since e-bikes demand less effort for merely propelling the bike the rider has more leisure to maintain awareness of their surroundings. Depending, of course, on how they choose to spend it.
212.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
You don't have to wait 20 minutes for a Bitcoin transaction to clear for the price of an iced coffee, either. For low-value transactions with a low risk of double-spending you can just verify that the transaction made it into the mempo
213.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
The national ID link happens at the exchange, via the normal KYC process. You prove your identity to the exchange, and you prove that you have the private key for the wallet by signing a challenge message. That's it. The relevant propo
214.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
The source machine may not be set up as a server, or you may not have an account there. Sending a .zip file could be simpler than pushing the repo to a third system the receiver does have access to.
215.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
> It would be trivial to have a similar mechanism for `bash_rc.d` which allows for a pluggable system to extend and modify your bash. There is /etc/profile.d/ which serves much the same purpose for login shells, though PS1
216.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
Coinbase definitely doesn't keep all their funds in a hot wallet. They keep enough readily accessible to cover the projected volume of withdrawals; the rest can be kept offline. They even specifically offer a "vault" service
217.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
> Isn't it self-hosted anonymous wallets? Yes, and the proposed restrictions only apply to transactions which directly involve an exchange. You can still have an anonymous self-hosted wallet, you just can't withdraw to it direc
218.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
It's hardly "unworkable". There are already systems in place for verifying your own wallets; you just need to sign a message using your key to verify that the wallet is actually yours. So far I haven't seen any proposed
219.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
Frontrunning gets you a worse price for your trade, so traders would naturally avoid exchanges which practice it in favor of others which offer a deal. There is no natural monopoly on crypto exchange services, though regulation does tend to
220.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
> To them, insider trading isn't unethical, quite the opposite. This does not follow. Even under the most "extreme libertarian" position insider trading, narrowly construed, would still be an unethical violation of the age
221.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
That's not a general observation about all, or even most, "crypto fans" as the earlier comment implied but rather just part of the Ethereum community. And it was still decentralized, as a majority of the users of Ethereum h
222.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
This is quite true. Many of the calls for regulation by "crypto people" which I've seen are really just a reaction against an uncertain regulatory environment. In short, they just want the regulators to make up their minds al
223.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
As I see it, insider trading rules are less about "information asymmetry" and more about avoiding conflicts of interest between the decision-makers in a company and the investors they are supposed to be working for. It is a given
224.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
It seem to me that this is something best handled with tag characters, like ¤XBT + (U+E007F) = ₿ (where the letters are from the tag block, U+E00xx). This mirrors one of the two systems for rendering national flags[0], just with a different
225.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
> Masks for the rescue. You can be identified by your gait these days, and even facial recognition has been modified to work even in the presence of (medical) masks. More exotic forms of mask covering the whole face would just make you s
226.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
> Your A) is exactly what is happening. Filtering on school account only. I said "their own network or a school-issued device". Not "on school accounts". Part of the blame here resides with Google for tying login on C
227.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
Apparently, according to another response from a Google employee, it depends on who logs in first. If you log in with the CPS account and then switch to another non-CPS account, the CPS policies are applied to both.
228.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
First, to get this out of the way, there is no meaningful sense in which OTP fails any of these IND-CPA/CCA1/CCA2 games. Depending on how you formulate the preconditions, either the games are simply not applicable to OTP and the
229.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
The sale will still be recorded, and your visit will be recorded on the security cameras; there is enough information there to associate the purchase with your identity if someone wants to make the effort. This also limits you to buying wha
230.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
What you check out from a library is protected as personal information. What you buy from a bookstore will most likely end up in a database somewhere. Whether physical or digital there will be a record of the purchase. Digital copies are
231.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
You don't need C99 for this, just some extra braces: if (fd == -1) return; if (p == -1 || (u_int)p >= npfd) fatal_f("channel %d: bad pfd %d (max %u)", c->self, p, npfd); {
232.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
You're correct, rsync operates over SSH (or its own native protocol) but runs a copy of the rsync binary on the remote side rather than using the SFTP subsystem.
233.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
> (future "show HN - scp replacement written in $FANCY_LANGUAGE that works even when sftp is disabled") Too late: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Files_transferred_over_shell_p... In KDE this is implemented
234.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
A variation on this would be: For each bit of the message take the next bit from the pad. If the bit is 0 then take a second bit from the pad and send it, then take a third bit, XOR it with the message, and send that. If the first bit is 1
235.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
> How do you get both sides to have the same infinite random pad? With Quantum Key Distribution both sides have access to identical streams of random bits not available to anyone else. Without invoking quantum mechanics, you can just tre
236.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
Not if the college is deliberately trying to hide that information—they'll make the acceptance and rejection letters the same size. Most systems have a finite limit to the sizes of the messages they can handle. (If nothing else there a
237.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
> … to drive my privately owned car on a public road, I need to take steps … to allow my car to be tracked and its usage monitored. Yes, for very restricted interpretations of "tracked" and "monitored" which are basic
238.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
I wouldn't go so far as to say that IND-CPA/CCA1/CCA2 aren't applicable . The fundamental error l33t2328 is making lies in mistaking the part of the pad used to encrypt a particular plaintext with the entire "key&q
239.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
"The same key" in the context of OTP means the same pad … all the key material shared between the sender and recipient. However, every encryption with that pad must use a different part of the pad or it isn't OTP at all. N
240.
▲
by
nybble41
5y ago
> It then asks for a decryption b' of c'. If you can do that, why not just ask this "oracle" for a decryption b of c, i.e. to decrypt the original ciphertext? Either way you're basically asking for a copy of the
More ›