nwienert

40 ms·

571.
by nwienert 4y ago
I searched "dog anemia" and got this as the first result: https://vcahospitals.com/know-your-pet/anemia-in-dogs Right there on the page: IMHA. If you add just a couple keywords from the large input, you likew
572.
by nwienert 4y ago
I made my search from the input not the output.
573.
by nwienert 4y ago
Here GPT did about 1000x worse than Google.
574.
by nwienert 4y ago
Yea I actually gave the author the benefit of the doubt thinking it must be a really rare thing, but "dog anemia" works even better.
575.
by nwienert 4y ago
Funny thing is Googling a very simple "dog anemia" suggests it in the first result. Which is unbelievably faster than pasting in a giant set of results and phrasing a question. I guess ChatGPT is the horse :P
576.
by nwienert 4y ago
My first google - "dog anemia low platelet count increase wbc" - first result suggests the same, plus 3-4 more on the first page. I'm guessing about 1000x faster than using ChatGPT. I think the real story here is how vulnerab
577.
by nwienert 4y ago
I built an always on local OCR system that used ML on CPU/GPU a few years ago and I can say with confidence it doesn’t use much. We literally scanned your entire screen every two seconds and it used less than 1% in total, and this was
578.
by nwienert 4y ago
That's a lie if so, if you look at the Reddit threads there's no way those were not specific other users histories as they had the logical history of reading browser history. Eg, one I saw had stuff like "what is X", the
579.
by nwienert 4y ago
Latest ensures if you used it before it won’t use the old version. npm create otherwise will always use the starter script that you last used, which isn’t what you want in this case. You always want the latest if you’re starting a new proje
580.
by nwienert 4y ago
I don't know Java well but I think you're comparing different things. Compare Next.js with Spring for example.
581.
by nwienert 4y ago
Others siblings have good replies, but also, we regulate without physical danger all the damn time. See airlines, traffic control, medical equipment, government services, but also we regulate ads, TV, financial services, crypto. I mean we r
582.
by nwienert 4y ago
Once you choose any of those frameworks listed that support it, creating a REST api is trivial and very well documented within many. Likewise, they almost all prescribe recommended solutions for many other things. That we have a wealth of g
583.
by nwienert 4y ago
Can you name another industry in tech that doesn't have a lot of options? Lets try backend, database, infra, ML, data science.
584.
by nwienert 4y ago
If you are targeting native and web, I think the Tamagui + Solito starter that lets you share code between Expo/Nextjs is unbeat (disclaimer, I made Tamagui): Just `npm create tamagui@latest` See: https://tamagui.dev Happy
585.
by nwienert 4y ago
We have a ton of protection laws around all sorts of dangerous technology, this is a super naive take. You can't buy tons of weapon technology, nuclear materials, aerosolized compounds, pesticides. These are all highly regulated and il
586.
by nwienert 4y ago
Docker Swarm is very underrated, more for multiple apps but you can of course just have one.
587.
by nwienert 4y ago
But there are tricks there aren't there? I'd want to look at home and car purchasing power, education, healthcare. If it's bundling in some tricks around technology as I've seen, it's very misleading IMO. And also t
588.
by nwienert 4y ago
If wages stay flat and capital makes gains, then in the most true general sense wage-earners are earning less of a % than before. Also what’s the story with purchasing power which seems to be way down. I think those are much more important
589.
by nwienert 4y ago
Immigration is a fundamentally incomplete answer that is designed to placate people who don't want to think to deeply about the actual issues. What happens to the countries they are emigrating from? Especially if we do as politicians s
590.
by nwienert 4y ago
Just reduce population, the framing that falling population is a bad thing is a fallacy and possibly the most important one to debunk in our time.
591.
by nwienert 4y ago
Me too, I couldn't get it to reliably go past move 15 without numerous errors. In my mind it's closer to 150 ELO than 1300, so I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
592.
by nwienert 4y ago
I'll add in as someone new to chess (~800 ELO): ChatGPT is in no way 1400, or even close to it. The fact this article gets upvoted around here is proof that people aren't thinking clearly about this stuff. It's trivially easy
593.
by nwienert 4y ago
In before all the comments about how “most code is trivial” or “most programming is stuff that already exists” or “you’re missing the point look how it’s getting better”. I really am in awe of how much work people seem willing to do to just
594.
by nwienert 4y ago
This is HN so if you’re claiming “dramatically” let’s get some proof.
595.
by nwienert 4y ago
This is either GPT or a berry bad take.
596.
by nwienert 4y ago
The title of the launch of my product a couple months ago - a labor of love - was nerfed, despite being backed by benchmarks.
597.
by nwienert 4y ago
How do you get from bigger LLMs being better at few shot learning to being able to generate novelties?
598.
by nwienert 4y ago
Do you think this net can tell us something about math or physics that we don’t know? If so, how? The person making the claim that this is as or more intelligent than humans should at a minimum show it do something as impressive as humans.
599.
by nwienert 4y ago
Considering my former co founder works at OpenAI and we spent years working on and talking about related ML with and around some of the best people in the world, considering I’ve implemented language models multiple times myself, please try
600.
by nwienert 4y ago
I think it was maybe the fastest rising post I’ve ever seen. That was solely because of the title.

More ›