Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nwh
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
45 ms
·
481.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
I would agree except for the Antlions. Infuriating gameplay.
482.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
A hash of a phone number or IP address would be trivial to reverse.
483.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
They certainly aren't English speakers. It's a pity because they've a really solid product, just not showing it off well to an international audience. The rest isn't full of mistakes as much as just being informal and in
484.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
Ack, it looks like a nice product but they need some help with their copywriting. > " So, you can't use Lightpack with your PlayStation 4 out-of-the-box cause you unable to run Prismatik in SONY ecosystem "
485.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
See also: https://github.com/prof7bit/goxtool
486.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
I imagine under the sea is actually quite a nice place to be, if you assume perfect waterproofing. There's litte radiation penetrating the water, so there's less chance of bit flips I imagine. You don't need to worry so much
487.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
Spacecraft and rovers use ridiculously armoured, redundant systems to get past the fact that they would fail quite regularly in such a hostile environment. The Curiosity rover in 2001 uses what would normally be quite an outdated 132Mhz CPU
488.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
That's right. You have to keep broadcasting it though, the transaction won't be retained in the nodes storage for a long period of time.
489.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
You can do a trick where you make a transaction from a private key with a nLockTime set in the future, then not broadcast it until that date, and destroy the original private hey. Then the only option is to wait until the time or block numb
490.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
A Block Eruptor ASIC (BE100) uses 10W/GH/s, a newer chip like Bitfury uses 0.9W/GW/s, the Block Eruptor 2 chip uses less than 0.2W/GH/s. It's decreasing rapidly.
491.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
You can do it without trust using nlocktime. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/NLockTime
492.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
More than that, it's things like "free to play" also sucking the will out of the consumer.
493.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
> Running mining nodes which will definitely be 100% CPU usage They would be mining Litecoin, which is GPU and CPU based. You can't mine this in a free instance, which rules out them abusing the free tier. Likely a lot of heat and
494.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GLONASS
495.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
You asked why mining was necessary. I provided an explanation.
496.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
Confirmations are just a measure of computing power essentially. By saying a transaction needs 3 confirmations you are saying that you require 30 minutes of network hashing time before you call a transaction secure. For the same 30 minutes
497.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefit
498.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
Litecoin does not solve any problem, just the proof of work algorithm is changed. The block time has nothing to do with it really, it just makes people believe one confirmation is as strong as any other (Litecoin's are actually just 4
499.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
A cryptocurrency based on CPUs is just fodder for Botnet herders, like Bitcoin was for quite a period. Amusingly, that was Litecoins original call to action, "GPUs are too centralised, we can only be CPU mined!", except that they
500.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
Yep. There's absolutely no risk for a vendor setting prices like this.
501.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
In short: misunderstanding ECDSA, or just writing a bad implementation, revealing their private key by signing twice with the same r value (it should have been random).
502.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
> Do we actually know how many large mining groups we need to make up 51% of the processing power of the block chain Two. GHash.io and BTCguild make up 27% each, for a total of 54%. https://blockchain.info/pools GHash.
503.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
> Even worse than USB is Firewire, which, if I am not mistaken, gives direct memory access to whatever device is connected. Both FireWire and Thunderbolt offer DMA. There's publicly available tools that allow you to extract passwo
504.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
Doubtful. The balance was never 39,917BTC, it's been dropping funds in and out for almost a month now. If it was stolen, they took their time doing it.
505.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
I just used pieces of John the Ripper and threw together something that worked.
506.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
.io is a generic TLD in most books now anyway. There's lots of other ccTLD that are fairly useless, though it's obvious why ones like .co.ck (the uninhabited Cook Islands) were never picked up as generics.
507.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
Hardly, for the earlier challenges I managed to hit ~50 a second with native code on a core i7. Missed out on winning any of the smaller challenges though though. I don't think it's worth my time unless I managed to find enough ha
508.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
> The limit is actually there to limit the size of a block. It has nothing to do with transaction fees. Again, the limit is there to create a market with transaction fees. People jostle for space in the block and a market develops arou
509.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
> BitCoin can support 7 transactions per second It doesn't really matter, it's not like they're at all close to that limit. The limit is there to create a market with transaction fees, so it's not just going to be &
510.
▲
by
nwh
13y ago
> Will this have legal weight? I doubt it. If I have to fax something for it to be a legal document, such an antiquated system will ignore any advances made around it.
More ›