nuxi7

9 ms·

31.
by nuxi7 12y ago
Google does the same thing, which annoys me to no end. I'm not sure when they started, within the past few years. They don't even return a Location header, so the links don't work with things like wget or curl. A link to goog
32.
by nuxi7 12y ago
"Chaves said the store owners told him the devices had remote access via Symantec’s pcAnywhere enabled, access that was granted to anyone knew the same set of default credentials." Maybe its because The Cuckoo's Egg is what g
33.
by nuxi7 12y ago
Happens to me too. Multiple browsers (Firefox 29 and Chrome 34) The talk at the URL is about something at CERN for me in both browsers. Its an interesting talk, but I don't think its what I'm supposed to be listening too... althou
34.
by nuxi7 12y ago
works with mtu.edu
35.
by nuxi7 12y ago
[root@vm-centos5 ~]# python Python 2.4.3 (#1, Jan 9 2013, 06:47:03) [GCC 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-54)] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
36.
by nuxi7 12y ago
Your description is an inaccurate representation of the API then. OpenSSL has had SHA-256 support by default since the initial 0.9.8 release. Use of the EVP lookup functions is dependent upon calling OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms() or populati
37.
by nuxi7 12y ago
With the deah of XP, the whole "why would you still be running X?" thing is a very popular attitude lately. I myself enjoy poking fun of my friend who works somewhere that just recently upgraded from MSIE 6 on XP to MSIE 7 on XP.
38.
by nuxi7 12y ago
Really? Openssl changelog implies all versions starting with 0.9.8 should handle sha256 signed certs. RHEL5's openssl 0.9.8e and Debian "Lenny" 5.0's openssl 0.9.8g both work fine with the SHA-256 signed cert. Although t
39.
by nuxi7 13y ago
microsoft removed it, but that doesn't mean he was right. Last I checked, the internet did not end while XP had raw sockets, and windows server retains this capability.
40.
by nuxi7 13y ago
Done, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=994478
41.
by nuxi7 13y ago
Who wants to file the bug for removal from Mozilla? http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/governance/policies/secur... Section 2, dot 2. CAs must revoke Certificates that they have issued upon the occurrenc
42.
by nuxi7 13y ago
Except its glaringly obvious that the original sender didn't send the new email. Notably, your emails are HTML only.
43.
by nuxi7 16y ago
Posession of lockpicking tools is regulated at a state level, in some states its perfectly legal, in others it is not. I have heard that postal regulations prohibit mailing lockpicking tools though. I have not specifically asked a postmaste
44.
by nuxi7 16y ago
Not true, this depends upon your jurisdiction. Anyone wondering if it is legal where they live should check their state and local laws. I've been told by locksmiths that lockpicking tools are illegal in my state, yet no one can point out wh
45.
by nuxi7 16y ago
Run your own local caching dns server or use one located in europe. The law requires ISPs to filter their DNS servers, not DNS traffic on their network. If they eventually add the latter to the law, then we can start talking about using Tor
46.
by nuxi7 16y ago
http://play.eveonline.com/en/home.aspx
47.
by nuxi7 16y ago
+5 for realizing that dbus-daemon is stupid because IPC is the kernel's job -10 for fixing it by putting dbus-daemon into the kernel To redeem yourself please try again with the following requirements: * No dbus-daemon * No changing or addi
48.
by nuxi7 16y ago
Duct tape works too.
49.
by nuxi7 16y ago
Except it completely tanks XHTML pages that are served as XML.
50.
by nuxi7 16y ago
TeX 3.15
51.
by nuxi7 16y ago
Contact
52.
by nuxi7 16y ago
Here is more info from the security researcher who wrote the app that got removed: http://jon.oberheide.org/blog/2010/06/25/remote-kill-and-ins...
53.
by nuxi7 16y ago
Ah, even if you win, you lose. After I made my previous post I was pondering what Viacom hops to win in this case. The obvious thought is that they want to gut the DMCA safe harbor, but this seems like it would make combating piracy harder
54.
by nuxi7 16y ago
Actually the interesting thing is that a good chunk of the ruling is citing multiple existing precedents stating that youtube is not guilty of contributory infringment. So it seems the precedents are there, but only the big guys like Google
55.
by nuxi7 16y ago
Or if everyone just left their cars at work and took public transit/carpools the rest of the time.
56.
by nuxi7 16y ago
I was making "$foo, the other white meat" jokes about 15 years ago in Jr High. I'm pretty sure its diluted already. Cats, the other white meat.
57.
by nuxi7 16y ago
Not everyone uses gmail...
58.
by nuxi7 16y ago
Thats really only funny until you realize they aren't talking about the Gulf oil.