Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nurettin
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
29 ms
·
751.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
Why not multiple queues?
752.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
I use LLMs to provide up to date information (by injecting newer information into the live conversation) and figure out what functions the user wants to call.
753.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
ouch I thought I was cynical
754.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
Spent years playing this game. It is the closest thing I've seen to real time chess. Also excellent soundtrack that sets the mood. EDIT: whoops I thought this was moonbase commander, another NASA sponsored game from another time.
755.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
> people also stop moving (exercising) significantly in their forties Also likely that people who never experienced the negative outcomes of a sedentary or unhealthy life style start doing so due to the biomolecular changes. Drinking mor
756.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
claude 3.5 didn't grovel on the ground praising me like chatgpt, but a few times I simplified its volatility and prediction calculations, it acted surprised and asked if it could keep my formula for the future. That was amusing.
757.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
That's it! The article beautifully summarizes how I interact with LLMs. Listing state of the art solutions and reformatting data is an excellent use case.
758.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
We are probably talking about entirely different things. Growing feet (if there is even such a thing) being attributed to evolution (by natural selection) sounds wrong, and I don't know how "rapid evolution" is related. And I
759.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
Very dubious. Maybe you can ask your LLM about evolution without natural selection.
760.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
I have tsoding fatigue at this point. BTW are you the DiabloD3 from freenode/#sdl like 25 years ago?
761.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
Yes we live in a society, and 50-100 years is not significant in an evolutionary scale (unless you are breeding artificially en-masse which would be funny in case of women with giant feet).
762.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
They have Economic Incentive to lie to you.
763.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
Collision detection doesn't seem to work when a particle's velocity exceeds the object size / check interval
764.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
If true, it might be due to nutrition or a myriad of other factors, not just pure evolution.
765.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
Too lazy to set up wireguard. I just use ssh -L. And if there is another server in the way I hop with ssh -J -L
766.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
If I had to deal with "AI agent concurrency", I would get them to submit their requests to a queue and process those sequentially.
767.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
I simply don't like the code it writes. Whenever I try using llms, it is like wrestling for conciseness. Terrible code which is almost certainly 1/10 error or "extras" I don't need. At this point I am simply using i
768.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
The entire 2012 scene used Rails. Then they realized it was hard to scale and rewrote everything in Go.
769.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
Meh, most of it is just more of the same thing. I'd rather play with a paper plane than float in space.
770.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
> "why does the universe have the parameters it does?" To those who say "oh but if this parameter was slightly off, that thing I subjectively decided to pick wouldn't have happened!": How would you know that this
771.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
So is inbreeding.
772.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
It kind of does what it says on the can, but you will have to edit the result frame by frame in order to make the lost scales and equipment consistent across all animations. Still, a huge time boost.
773.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
I hear these all the time: 1. Non-zero sum 2. Market efficiency 3. Everything is priced in 1 only makes sense if you are the market as a whole (you are not), not the one who is making the more informed decisions. 2 is tru
774.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
floats are also a red herring. Maybe you can continue with someone else.
775.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
Within the general context of this discussion, "cannot be represented" is a red herring. You don't need to have a representation of the exact number 0.1 if you can tolerate errors after the 7th decimal (and it turns out you c
776.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
I inherited systems that trade real world money using f64. They work surprisingly well, and the errors and bugs are almost never due to rounding. Those that are also have easy fixes. So I'm always baffled by this "expert opinion&q
777.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
What makes me confident is the fact that I've been using gcc since 2.95 (well redhat had its patched "2.96" but yeah) so I witnessed the evolution of these parameters. What makes neural networks and learning irrelevant is bec
778.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
pretty much all Q_4 models on huggingface fit in consumer grade cards.
779.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
-O3 -march=native is pretty much all you need and the rest is marginal or circumstantial.
780.
▲
by
nurettin
1y ago
It is not about "more expensive computation" that is just absolute nonsensical rhetoric. Again, given these basic examples, probability of outcomes have nothing to do with bayes. Bayes needs at least two scenarios to distinguish b
More ›