Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nurettin
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
331.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2024/05/31/tes... > Musk sold 19.5 million Tesla shares worth about $3.95 billion in November 2022 I mean sure it is his to sell, but how is that dif
332.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
When I was a kid, piracy was the norm. If your friend had a game you liked, you would just grab the tape, go home, insert into the recorder and make a copy. I didn't know about buying games or what I did was bad until well into the 90s
333.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
I didn't know!
334.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
WDYM "now"? Companies that get large enough get contracts. Even apple sold power macs iphones and ipads to us mil.
335.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
Anyone else religiously went through 490 packages in cppget to make sure they aren't missing out?
336.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
I burned like 10 MTG alpha mint black lotuses at a camp fire.
337.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
I want to agree, but in this current form, gp comes off as an emotional gatekeeper rather than someone with valid points. I think there are strong arguments for both sides. One off scripts with types is bs. Glue code with types, almost bs.
338.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
This could be interesting, but do you have arguments other than "stop ruining muh languages" or "u r dumb"?
339.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
> Ruby, with types! "Language with ruby-like syntax" more appropriate.
340.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
> what is the point of the recent wave of types for python, Ruby, and similar languages? Code that doesn't integrate directly with wires (controllers, active record, websocket, etc) IMO This is for complex, well refactored, testable
341.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
> When a package says it requires python<4.0, uv ignores the upper bound and only checks the lower. I will bring popcorn on python 4 release date.
342.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
What problem have you had with the debugger?
343.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
> It quite obvious that open source models are catching up to closed source models very fast they about 3-4 months behind > Maybe I'm way off on this. If by open source, you mean downloadable from huggingface and SOTA you mean op
344.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
+ It is also blessed by PowerBI and recently, Excel.
345.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
> Yet if one studied physics (beyond your basic college courses) you'd understand the naïveté of that. I studied enough physics to get a mech. eng. diploma. And I still understand the naivete. Observational physics can be derived wi
346.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
Ah, that must be a recent development.
347.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
To be fair, vscode and .net core on linux is pretty much like having windows and visual studio at this point.
348.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
Used Ruby for a decade, knew about it for more than that. I still sometimes use ruby syntax to communicate ideas with friends and colleagues. For me, the killer feature of Python was the typing module and the intellij pycharm community edit
349.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
> Visually, they are stunning. The input images are stunning, model's result is another disappointing trip to uncanny valley. But we feel Ok as long as the sequence doesn't horribly contradict the original image or sound. That
350.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
I've had a two hour long discussion with a super llm about a somewhat complex event loop processing task. It could not manage. I even restarted the session a couple of times. Then I did it manually and showed it a working version using
351.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
def ruby(is) it = is a = "bad" example() begin it["had"] = pascal(:like) rescue flow end end
352.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
Special mention and thanks to headius (Charles Oliver Nutter) for his contributions to JRuby, he enabled many of my cross-platform projects back in 201* which would have been harder to build without the expressive and terse syntax Ruby prov
353.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
It used to be "don't try to outsmart the compiler", I'm waiting for the time people start saying the same thing about LLMs.
354.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
Interesting. I develop two projects and maintain a few. I haven't opened an IDE within the past two weeks. What do you do with an IDE? Stare as code is written, refactored, tested and debugged automatically?
355.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
I am very happy and sad for people who will never debug their own code for days to figure out subtle bugs. Happy because they won't endure the torture, sad because an LLM took away their opportunity to learn and better themselves.
356.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
I had a colleague who was hostile to any language other than common lisp. Except python, which I assume is just because this page exists. What if norvig woke up that day and decided to write about Ruby instead?
357.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
What happened in 2017?
358.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
Glad you remembered in the end!
359.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
That's a surprising amount of investment, well done and godspeed.
360.
▲
by
nurettin
10mo ago
To be fair, you may find equally capable random people in this thread, doesn't mean they speak with any kind of authority.
More ›