nupark

11 ms·

61.
by nupark 16y ago
I don't follow. Isn't needing a meeting to create a branch an organizational problem, not a technical one? As for working offline, my choice of the submarine example was intentional. 10 years ago I used cvsup (and later, svk) to work on t
62.
by nupark 16y ago
Whereas with a simpler tool like subversion, there will be no tight spots.
63.
by nupark 16y ago
I don't understand the branching mantra that I hear from git proponents. Subversion has had merge tracking since 1.5, and with it, branching and method is as painless as it can reasonably be. Unless you want to work on a submarine, or have
64.
by nupark 16y ago
That would be "open source".
65.
by nupark 16y ago
Most people are well aware of the history; "Free" is a generic term, and attempting to claim it from other open source developers is patronizing. "Open Source" is inclusive of GPL licensed software -- I don't see the need for a GNU/Linux st
66.
by nupark 16y ago
There are people who are put off by the social supposition and patronization inherent in insisting on the semantic distinction of "Free [FLOSS] and Open-Source". This is predicated on the notion of a non-exclusive ownership of "free," as in
67.
by nupark 16y ago
Whether or not Black Pixel is at fault, John Casasanta has guaranteed that no iOS contracting company with a reputation to consider will want to work with him, ever.
68.
by nupark 16y ago
You could build a device that's a lot smaller / less obvious than a cell phone for less than $20. With an SMD AVR microcontroller, you could power it direct from the USB port, and the device would be not much bigger than a USB stick. In fac