Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nullc
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
43 ms
·
721.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
> Why would kids benefit from working? Shouldn't the benefit be from going to school? There is a purely 'academic' educational advantage, -- it's like asking why should there be chemistry lab, shouldn't chemistry
722.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
Totally separate from this line of discussion is that if you want to use an LLM for, say, copyediting it's pretty obvious to me how a diffusion model could get much better results. Like if you take your existing document and measure th
723.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
::nods:: in the case of diffusion though "conditional on its own (eventual) output" is more transparent and explicit. As an example of one place that might make a difference is that some external syntax restriction in the sampler
724.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
If they give you want you want you might just enjoy it and leave satisfied. They don't want you to leave, what you want is largely immaterial except as an input to the machine designed to brainwash you into staying.
725.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
Consider the entropy of the distribution of token X in these examples: "Four X" and "Four X and seven years ago". In the first case X could be pretty much anything, but in the second case we both know the only likely com
726.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
Having to use vacuum UV is a bit of a bummer... just doing anything inside a vacuum is a PITA.
727.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
The modern approach is common view time transfer. Both clocks can observe signal sources such as satellites and compute their relative offsets. The signal doesn't need to be particularly accurate (though it doesn't hurt), thoug
728.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
The timing output from a $5 gps receiver isn't particularly impressive. You have to go to pretty long time intervals for a non-timing GPS to win out. Depending on your application those intervals may be thoroughly irrelevant, e.g. us
729.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
It's more fundamental than the 'chat persona'. Same story, different day: https://nt4tn.net/articles/aixy.html :P
730.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
SA.45s (and the eval board) has been on mouser in the past, I'm not sure if they carry it now because mouser continually blocks me these days. It was previously around $1500. If you're interested in a small atomic clock and don&#
731.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
> but I pay for youtube premium I found your error.
732.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
The no recommendations at all sure feels like malicious compliance with California privacy law. Even while pretending they've not recorded your viewing history they could still make recommendations from your subscriptions or give you t
733.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
High average productivity can just as well come from aggressively not employing anyone that doesn't drive the revenue per head-count forward. I suggest that the below-average workers productivity is inflated by aggressive fat cutting-
734.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
As a worker being denied the ability to get work I wanted to accept at an agreed wage because someone far away who never met me and doesn't understand my life thought it was too low for my own good isn't particularly dignified. Th
735.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
I'm in California. Two of my favorite fast food restaurants have closed (or closed their locations here) others have radically reduced their workforce and replaced humans with machines. It'll be interesting to see if this effect
736.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
Have you ever lived in poverty? Have you ever earned minimum wage (or below)? I have and I am extremely grateful for the oppturnities it brought me and the life I was eventually able to make out of it. There are myriad ways to dehumanize a
737.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
It's not a question of anyone asking. Lets imagine that there is a job with parameters (including wages) where only high schoolers would take the job. Should that job be required to pay above the market wage to make it also attractive
738.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
By living with friends or family, state assistance, and/or charity. How are you supposed to live on 0 wage? Inevitably for some people that's what a minimum wage means: There is some work with some wage less than a minimum for wh
739.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
My analogous gnome experience was that on my tv-computer I was using 4x scaling, because TV and because my distance vision stinks. At some point they decided 2x (3x?) scaling was enough for anyone and took away 4x, I didn't notice beca
740.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
Is there really a limit on bits to shed? I suspect not. Take N gates, normalize them, represent them as points on the surface of a hypersphere. Quantize the hypersphere as coarsely as you need to get the precision you want. Want less pr
741.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
Might be useful to use gabor filters as the basis function, since just 2d cosine filters doesn't produce particularly sparse output for angled features. The additional overcompleteness would probably be helpful for the NN learning.
742.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
Fair point though compilers could presumably do much better warning there on arrays-- at least treating the whole array like a single variable and warning when it knows you've read it without ever reading for it.
743.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
C is a bad language, too bad all the others are even worse. :P
744.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
meh, the compiler can almost always eliminate the spurious default initialization because it can prove that first use is the variable being set by the real initialization. The only time the redundant initialization will be emitted by an op
745.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
Zero initializing often hides real and serious bugs, however. Say you have a function with an internal variable LEN that ought to get set to some dynamic length that internal operations will run over. Changes to the code introduce a path
746.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
You can still get a refund with this tax credit, but it has to be a refund of taxes you paid through things like your payroll tax. Non-refundable means that if the rebate drives your owed taxes below zero you don't get the negative tax
747.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
It's ~28k without them, particularly when considering recent inflation it's an attractive price... inflation corrected it's in the vague ballpark of other small IC trucks when they were still available. E.g. a early 2000'
748.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
> 1. Poorer people tend to drive older vehicles, so if you solely encourage higher fuel economies by taxing carbon emissions, then the tax is (at least short-term) regressive. The idea that policy makers care about this in any meaningful
749.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
I have a small(*) twenty year old i4 pickup and I regularly get cash offers for it while out and about. There is a lot of demand for the small inexpensive and relatively fuel efficient utility vehicles that the government currently prohibi
750.
▲
by
nullc
1y ago
Because they have been pressured by the US Government to engage in censorship which is unlawful for the government to perform. See also: Operation Choke Point and Operation Choke Point 2.0. Even in cases where it might be lawful for th
More ›