nullbio

17 ms·

451.
by nullbio 4mo ago
I feel like the labs and their army of bots are responsible for spreading the "inference is subsidized" narrative. It plays right into their hand and justifies high prices and price increases. Anthropic in particular loves milking
452.
by nullbio 4mo ago
I think OpenAI will still maintain the lead for at least another few years. The cost of hardware still needs to dramatically drop for open-weight models to be viable for local usage. Even with the release of things like Nvidia DGX Spark and
453.
by nullbio 4mo ago
I had the same problem. Was using this a few months ago, had it running for weeks, and noticed that code was disappearing. I no longer use it. Aside from that, I decided there's no point anyway, considering that LLMs are great at figur
454.
by nullbio 4mo ago
Hallucination city, doing whatever it feels like and far more than what I've bargained for, and performance on par with Opus 4.8 for coding in a large production codebase. I still have far more success with GPT 5.5, it actually follows
455.
by nullbio 4mo ago
Times are changing. The open-weight models have needed time to catch up, but they're finally at a point now where we can get almost frontier level capabilities for coding. I just wish we had a way to actually benchmark them properly th
456.
by nullbio 4mo ago
I know the big labs like to pretend that their models are trillion parameter. But how likely is that really to be the case when Qwen 3.6 35B A3B gets so close to their performance? Seems that with the best research applied, best training da
457.
by nullbio 4mo ago
Can we stop pretending that Mythos is a good model yet?
458.
by nullbio 4mo ago
Strongly disagree: https://build.nvidia.com/models Their license terms are also incredibly generous and allow commercial use, modification, etc, at no cost.
459.
by nullbio 4mo ago
The proof is in the pudding though. I'm judging based on their actions, not on their words. They're making AI models and AI research widely accessible, including selling consumer grade hardware to run them locally, and to use open
460.
by nullbio 4mo ago
It's great for people who are just maintaining something. Less so for someone building something from scratch, in the earlier phases.
461.
by nullbio 4mo ago
https://clawd.rip
462.
by nullbio 4mo ago
When Jensen (Nvidia) was doing interviews at his recent public talks, he was asked something along the lines of: "Why release these new laptops which are a low margin market, if your other businesses are vastly more profitable?" a
463.
by nullbio 4mo ago
This is a good idea. I've been hoping that a large player with enough social reach would create an open-source fund that everyone can contribute to, to develop a company that trains and releases open-source models at the cutting edge.
464.
by nullbio 4mo ago
It's actually the opposite. Democratization of intelligence is the only way to stop existential threats and render them useless. Right now, and likely forever, because biological threats can be sanctioned at a supply-chain level, the r
465.
by nullbio 4mo ago
That's a huge grasp. Anthropic have been making this bed for years now. Altman did not need to do a single thing for this outcome to materialize.
466.
by nullbio 4mo ago
It's not only tenable, it is a necessity. Unless you want humanity to be enslaved in perpetuity to a single figurehead. Bad AI is only countered by having a majority of good, open-access and open-source AI to keep it in check, where th
467.
by nullbio 4mo ago
Anthropic is almost solely responsible for the fear narrative around AI at this point. It has been their culture since the beginning, strongly pushing this into the zeitgeist at every opportunity, releasing bogus papers to frame things as h
468.
by nullbio 4mo ago
It's Anthropic facing consequences for their years long marketing plays. They're so greedy and narcissistic as a company and culture they believed they were special enough to be excluded from sanction internally, and that their be
469.
by nullbio 4mo ago
Not at all. The writing is on the wall, and they want you to be locked into paying absurd subscription rates for neutered models while they internally use all of that money to run the unrestricted models to clone all of our businesses and s
470.
by nullbio 4mo ago
I really hope this is just an 'fu' to Anthropic for their disgusting business behavior. The funny thing is that the model isn't even impressive. I'd still use ChatGPT over it for anything other than design work. As soon
471.
by nullbio 4mo ago
Claude is made for dumdums. The product is to automate as much as possible and remove the burden of thinking. ChatGPT is much more hands on, but it gives you more power and flexibility and actually listens to your demands.
472.
by nullbio 4mo ago
I genuinely think that Fable is just Opus 4.8 with some extra skills and harness. I saw a video of someone generating UI with them both side by side, and it gives identical recommendations for themes etc. Doesn't feel like a new model
473.
by nullbio 4mo ago
I think none of them having a defacto and high quality English focused cli is a big part of it. None of the Chinese models I've tried have worked well in opensource cli's. Granted, I've only tried a few, but still...
474.
by nullbio 4mo ago
Sounds like it was distilled from Claude. I don't understand the appeal of an agent that does whatever it wants.
475.
by nullbio 4mo ago
It also uses 1/4th to 1/10th the amount of tokens. If I want all that extra garbage I'll tell Codex to do it or build a pipeline with Codex. Otherwise, don't. Codex gives you control, Claude just does whatever it wants a
476.
by nullbio 4mo ago
Exactly why I hate using Claude. Furthermore, if you tell it not to do this over-exploration and automation in your CLAUDE.md, it will ignore it. Meanwhile ChatGPT religiously follows every instruction, and will trace its behavior back to a
477.
by nullbio 4mo ago
Still don't know why people use Claude. Maybe because they don't know what they're doing.
478.
by nullbio 4mo ago
Exactly. This screams crowdfunding for AI labs. Who made this? Someone at Anthropic?
479.
by nullbio 4mo ago
They haven't though. There's a long term plan here, and the goal is power and wealth. Short term moves that appear irrational turn out to be rational (from a greed perspective) when you factor in other considerations, like: Use th
480.
by nullbio 4mo ago
Why invent new motives for Anthropic when their real motives are plain and obvious and have been confirmed time and time again by their behavior over the last few years? Their concern is their own power and wealth. Every other conceivable m

More ›