ntakasaki

18 ms·

31.
Karpman drama triangle(en.wikipedia.org)
1 points by ntakasaki 11y ago|0 comments
32.
by ntakasaki 11y ago
That doesn't even take into account dividends paid or the dotcom boom. My bad for clicking on a low quality non tech forum site.
33.
by ntakasaki 11y ago
Boards have to approve every major move by a CEO and can fire a CEO at any given time for any or no reason. This person was the chairman of the board, read through his profile: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jorma_Ollila
34.
Apple going to have a hard time competing with Google if it doesn't collect data(businessinsider.com)
1 points by ntakasaki 11y ago|0 comments
35.
by ntakasaki 11y ago
>We are also building a Web site that impacted customers can visit to receive their credit. We will update this post with a link to that site as soon as it is available and will share the link on Twitter through our customer support hand
36.
by ntakasaki 11y ago
Personal anecdote time. Have been using Linux off and on since 2000. Later my job required .NET, so got into the MS stack but still kept playing around with Linux for things like IRC bots etc. Then at work there was a major open source push
37.
by ntakasaki 11y ago
>This makes me even more angry at SourceForge and not less. YCombinator also invested in a company that did this. http://www.istartedsomething.com/20130115/y-combinator-is-fu... Here's pg's response: >2
38.
by ntakasaki 11y ago
Dice Holdings also bought Slashdot, and now there are things that look out of place, like the Kate Upton ad for God of War, Slashdot Deals [1], and annoying ads as tweets on the twitter account which made me unfollow. [1] https:/&#x2F
39.
What happened to the dinosaurs?(scienceblogs.com)
47 points by ntakasaki 11y ago|40 comments
40.
by ntakasaki 11y ago
>When you open up a lot of stuff and your competitor uses it freely and gets credit for doing that, but you can't do the same with your competitors' products - what's the outcome? You mean like how Chrome is bundled with F
41.
Florida woman released in jailing over son's circumcision(wtop.com)
2 points by ntakasaki 11y ago|0 comments
42.
by ntakasaki 11y ago
The Nokia patents were not part of the acquisition, Nokia Networks kept them.
43.
Accelerate .NET Applications with GPU(devblogs.nvidia.com)
5 points by ntakasaki 11y ago|0 comments
44.
Richland's $4.1M police station funded by civil forfeiture(watchdog.org)
2 points by ntakasaki 11y ago|0 comments
45.
Install and Configure Windows 10 Insider Preview on Raspberry Pi 2(thurrott.com)
13 points by ntakasaki 11y ago|4 comments
46.
Genuine Windows and Windows 10(blogs.windows.com)
4 points by ntakasaki 11y ago|0 comments
47.
by ntakasaki 12y ago
Folks aren't talking about FirefoxOS replacing laptops or desktops though, unlike Chromebooks, if you follow this thread. Nor does Mozilla do a lot of cloud business nor is it in the business of tracking users for advertizing purposes.
48.
by ntakasaki 12y ago
Just because you can replace an OS does not mean it's open. It's about the ecosystem too. How much percentage of Chromebooks could be running Crouton or Linux? I wager less than 2%.
49.
by ntakasaki 12y ago
You mean Google does not know exactly how many Chromebooks are being sold by Asus, Lenovo, HP, etc?
50.
by ntakasaki 12y ago
> iOS, which is even more neutered than ChromeOS I disagree, developers can develop native apps for iOS even if they need to go through the App Store. Only crippled web apps are allowed on Chrome OS and only Google can develop really nat
51.
by ntakasaki 12y ago
>Chromebook sales are constantly rising Where are the real shipping numbers from Google then? Surely they must know the numbers? Why won't they release it then? The only reason I can think of could be that they aren't all that
52.
by ntakasaki 12y ago
It's sad to see folks celebrating computing devices that are more extremely locked down than even the iDevices. A Windows PC/laptop is much more open than a Chromebook. Can Mozilla even make a Firefox browser for ChromeOS? Only Go
53.
by ntakasaki 12y ago
>where nor developers of the software and users of the software have no say. The Chromebook is actually worse, since the iDevices at least give you access to run native applications even if they have to be approved by Apple. On a Chromeb
54.
by ntakasaki 12y ago
You can install Linux on Windows PCs without even needing to developer unlock, doesn't that mean they're as open as Chroembooks. Not to mention things like if the battery goes completely dead on some Chromebooks, Linux is complete
55.
by ntakasaki 12y ago
Not just created, but bundled and installed with default by Java and Flash updates some of which also install the Google toolbar into IE. Many folks that I had converted to Firefox from IE back in the day use Chrome now and have no idea how
56.
by ntakasaki 12y ago
What is more open, a Chromebook or a Windows laptop or a Macbook? I would think a Windows laptop or a Macbook because the users and developers can install or develop any application, yet we have everyone singing the praises of heavily DRM&#
57.
by ntakasaki 12y ago
>In 2011, Google famously accused Microsoft’s Bing search engine of doing exactly that: logging Google search traffic in Microsoft’s own Internet Explorer browser in order to improve the quality of Bing results. MS didn't do that fr
58.
Ask toolbar components are silently installed on OS X along with Java(rainmannoodles.com)
6 points by ntakasaki 12y ago|1 comments
59.
by ntakasaki 12y ago
http://www.chmag.in/article/sep2011/rootkits-are-back-boot-i... http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/11/16/tdl_rootkit_does_64_... http://www.computerworld.com/s/a
60.
Windows Server 2016 leaks reveal Nano Server, protected VM role plans(zdnet.com)
5 points by ntakasaki 12y ago|0 comments

More ›