Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nsteel
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
241.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
Did you read the linked paper which talks a lot about TCP pacing? https://sammy.brucespang.com/sammy.pdf
242.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
Waveshare have a lot of good options these days: https://thepihut.com/collections/adafruit-lcds-displays?sort... I like the look of 1.83" IPS LCD Display Module (240 x 280) for £9. But as another comment already m
243.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
I don't use Dolphin so I don't know what this really means in reality but the article states > These are proper release builds however, with the full infrastructure and support that comes with them. They are tagged as releases
244.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
The only good thing about not lubricating your drivetrain is that replacing/fixing it won't be so messy!
245.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
Please do be careful and monitor the condition of your chain if you're going to deliberately let it degrade. You can cause yourself quite a nasty accident when your chain snaps, or even slips on the teeth at an unfortunate moment. I&#x
246.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
The article mentions that the perf of unix domain sockets was not significantly better: > I was surprised at how similarly most things performed. I did a cursory investigation into Linux-specific approaches like dbus and Unix Domain Sock
247.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
Except for idioms like "I've got a guy" where you just mean you've got someone in mind. And that's where I was coming from with "silicon guy" or "hardware guy", "software guy" etc. Just
248.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
There's no maybe about it. And it goes beyond greetings. But I do agree it was non-sensical here
249.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
I don't think this is the case. Isn't it that "guy" is essentially gender neutral in this context? In the same way you can reasonably say "hi guys" to greet people of any gender. "Silicon person", &qu
250.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
Are machine generated podcasts also a thing? My gut feeling is that it would've harder to make passable AI podcasts but I can't give a rational reason why. Spotify would be all over that.
251.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
Right, so $80 worth of processing and the HAT itself ($10). $70 is decent.
252.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
> The board is probably <$10 What are the alternatives at this price point? Given that a "Hailo-8 Starter Kit" is $179 (I'm not sure if that's more of less powerful than this Pi one), the Pi offering seems like a g
253.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
> Nothing like being a supposed open source darling They've never claimed to be an open-source company. It's unfair to judge a company (or charity) against your own ideas of what they stand for. Some of their software is open s
254.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
The bigger the better, right? If so, this: https://thepihut.com/products/ice-tower-plus-for-raspberry-p...
255.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
The temperature inversion effect is more pronounced at 16nm (Pi 5) than older nodes. This results in high VT cells performing better when warmer, the opposite of what we are used to. At the "normal" operating conditions (temp and
256.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
Isn't this a dupe of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40352656 from 2 days ago?
257.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
I think the next revision is going to be more interesting. Remember, this was their first go at a product in this space.
258.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
https://github.com/geerlingguy/sbc-reviews/issues/21 Power Idle power draw (at wall): 1.8 W (See note) Maximum simulated power draw (stress-ng --matrix 0): 9.7 W During Geekbench multicore bench
259.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
I was really excited about those hardkernel boards 10 years until I got one and found I had to use their outdated custom version of Ubuntu and still half of it didn't work. I assume things have gotten better since then but they don
260.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
They designed and built their own microcontroller. This chasing performance narrative doesn't make sense. And let's be real, it doesn't have 25W power consumption. You can attach enough things to it to get to 25W if you try r
261.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
Sorry, I really should have said, there's no duty to maximise/provide a dividend. And I didn't provide a reference because I consideree it well known /fundamental (in the UK only, perhaps). I'm glad the supreme cour
262.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
There was a good interview with Eben Upton back in Feb on this topic (and others): https://hackaday.com/2024/02/28/floss-weekly-episode-772-ras...
263.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
I would like to think it's also partly a message that this move isn't about profit seeking. British companies do not have legal duty to maximise their profit. NYSE investors might not appreciate this foreign idea.
264.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
Do you know why that is? The Zero 2 W (and Pi 3) support the 64-bit verison of Raspberry Pi OS. Don't they also run Wayland? Not enough RAM? EDIT: I should have taken a minute to check the Pi OS release notes: > Desktop now runs on
265.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
You used to be able to visit Dungeness but they are apparently still waiting for COVID19 to pass. https://www.tripadvisor.co.uk/Attraction_Review-g3318368-d21...
266.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
Can you get touchscreens that are still usable when they get water on them? Say, from sprinkler system? I'm sure they have thought of this, but that's one pretty common situation where you really don't want a touchscreen for
267.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
Except the relationship between stores, customers and competitors all revolves around money and doesn't make sense in this context.
268.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
They are 16nm, so yeh, "old". Newer tech means a newer node and considerably more expensive. At which point, why are you buying an SBC over some small intel/amd thing?
269.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
But isn't that GDDR option something like 3-4x the bandwidth? So you'd fit far fewer chips to hit the same bandwidth.
270.
▲
by
nsteel
2y ago
> It will get there eventually. That 'eventually' just got longer: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-68935522
More ›