nsonha

37 ms·

811.
by nsonha 3y ago
wait, it says HDMI, does that mean HDMI works via type-c adapter?
812.
by nsonha 3y ago
that's not the problem. The problem is that your back-end always has things to do OTHER than crud to DB. What about working with users' token? in-memory caching? calling other services? sending emails? And don't tell me that
813.
by nsonha 3y ago
first direct DB to API, now direct DB to HTML, when does this insanity end?
814.
by nsonha 3y ago
I think more like tools for a language tend to be written in that language. Obviously the author needs to care enough about the target language and if they support plugins then it’s also desirable for the plugins to be written in the target
815.
by nsonha 3y ago
I don’t understand generated API. It’s useless and doesn’t save much typing to begin with
816.
by nsonha 3y ago
the physical limitation of more CPUs: heat, which in turn downgrades performance
817.
by nsonha 3y ago
> OOP-world analogy was always shallow to begin with I would also add that the purpose of visibility is to encapsulate and not some sort of access control. All the objects of the same class are implemented with the same code so they are
818.
by nsonha 3y ago
why do CRUD endpoints even exist? I can't think of a scenario in which I receive something from the front-end, do NOTHING, and just pass it all to DB, even sanitized.
819.
by nsonha 3y ago
the rest of the desktop software as we know as the browser (the UI, a config system, security features, history, profile, devtools...)
820.
by nsonha 3y ago
sorry, Tailwind is the opposite of the design system concept. Design system is built around your product, not some generic style framework that helps you avoid building such a thing.
821.
by nsonha 3y ago
why not just use the (smart) phone?
822.
by nsonha 3y ago
why didn't they do so? what's the challenge? I suppose they could've programmed in some prompt indicator (like "OK Google" but less obvious), then that demo could have been technically feasible.
823.
by nsonha 3y ago
Why do you need to know what/what not is a delayed operation? Seem like the worse languages are ones you have to do that, instead of just caring about the computation. Polluting your function signatures with some abstraction that has n
824.
by nsonha 3y ago
Yes I literally called it a disease. Just look up “what color is your function”, I’m hardly the only person who thinks so. There are more languages without async await that ones that have. The language that’s known most for massive concurre
825.
by nsonha 3y ago
Congratulation for spreading a disease in PL design. Await is controversial at best and should not be considered a pro.
826.
by nsonha 3y ago
Swift, C#, Scala: the top languages for having a bloated design and make people choose between a gazillian ways of doing things for every single coding decision.
827.
by nsonha 3y ago
they are not the same kind of thing though, one is a library TO WORK WITH styles, the other is a library AND some styles
828.
by nsonha 3y ago
is there a point to this? While it's fun to the author, it just reinforces a talking point that no experienced engineer take seriously but kept getting parotted by some people, to the detriment of beginners who believe in them.
829.
by nsonha 3y ago
I use the PaperWM spoon, a port of the Gnome thing. It does not make sense to me to use a "normal" tilling wm that automatically messes up windows' dimensions without asking me I just need the windows to be automatically put
830.
by nsonha 3y ago
have components for layout? Use css grid which is much more flexible?
831.
by nsonha 3y ago
if you already use a high level component model, why does it matter that it's implemented in Tailwind? What is the benefit of Tailwind anyway? You should think in terms of props and variants, not some alias indirection to css propertie
832.
by nsonha 3y ago
the web is not data, this is the fundamental thing that's problematic about that way of thinking. We already have structured data, it's called database
833.
by nsonha 3y ago
my memory is hazy but aren't semantic web, ontology and all that HATEOAS stuff for bots instead of humans? Now that LLM is here, what use do they have?
834.
by nsonha 3y ago
coming from mobile, the primitives of the web are really poorly designed. The list of tags/attributes is bloated. Each of them is overloaded with multiple purposes (presentation, semantic, accessibility)... On top of that, they all hav
835.
by nsonha 3y ago
Why is everything on the web has to serve some random tinkerer who do not benefit the creator of the website in any way? How about we apply this thinking to other kind of products? An app has to be designed for tinkerers to? A cars, a rocke
836.
by nsonha 3y ago
I think that is some lousy excuse for lying
837.
by nsonha 3y ago
isn't the first problem of documentation is keeping it in sync with the source code? Time and time again people come up with "better ways of documentation" while neglecting this basic problem, what problem do they think they&
838.
by nsonha 3y ago
vendor agnostic doesn't exist
839.
by nsonha 3y ago
as opposed to using a different set of tool AND THEN write separate code for each vendor
840.
by nsonha 3y ago
I didn't have to read very far: > ...they can render before JavaScript what? Because web components are written in and run on magic? > a design of composability... composing core content with HTML and then wrapping it in a custom

More ›