Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nsajko
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
35 ms
·
451.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
You're entirely missing what the parent is talking about. Your point that "none of the characters giving voice to anything are sympathetic" is irrelevant. On the other hand: > They’re portrayed as tragically ridiculous pla
452.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
> regular people hearing "NGO" interprete it as shady-leftist-organisation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda
453.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
No.
454.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
> outrageous distinction between the free people of "Sparta", which he calls "Spartiates" and all "Spartans" which includes the helots > That is an outrageous distinction that is not found in any ancient
455.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
Sparta can also refer to the entire state. I think you're making a fuss out of nothing. Also, Sparta wasn't just Spartiates and helots, you're forgetting about mothakes and perioikoi.
456.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
> Aren't all of those C/C++? No. > If you're trying to render a frame full of AAA graphics in under 15 milliseconds Irrelevant. > But if I'm just writing an email client... Use bindings.
457.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
The paragraph immediately below: > Access the power of Opal Computer Vision within the Opal app. The app allows you fine-grain tuning of your image and access to Machine Learning powered features that help you look your best. So the soft
458.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
There are more reconstructions and some photos in the linked paper, e.g.: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/cms/asset/1a42ffff-eeca-4... Meeting one of these would be quite uncanny, as it's very different fr
459.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
GTK actually seems to be capable of this for many years, with its "Broadway" GDK backend: GTK4 docs: https://docs.gtk.org/gtk4/broadway.html GTK3 docs: https://docs.gtk.org/gtk3/broadway.
460.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
There's a Wikipedia page for "predictive policing": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predictive_policing It links to this interesting article: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20200722
461.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
Interesting idea, but it obviously gives the most power to whomever does the categorization. BTW, the problem presented in this post is very common, but it's only relevant for less interesting topics (which are most topics). In cases w
462.
▲
How “Consensus” Works on Wikipedia
(en.wikipedia.org)
1 points
by
nsajko
5y ago
|
2 comments
463.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
The article is too fluffy to bother reading, and it seems like it may be just attacking straw men. TLDR, maybe; with interesting facts, if any?
464.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
How can you blame a kernel panic on an unprivileged userspace program? That doesn't make sense. I.e., Firefox can maybe trigger a kernel panic, but the blame lies either with the kernel or, indeed, with defective hardware.
465.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
Because it's a pain in the ass with no security benefit in general. What attackers would it protect you from?
466.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
I see people saying things like > we need to make concessions with computers when we market them to the masses or > RMS's argument made a lot more sense when computers were a professional tool used by trained individuals. But tha
467.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
I agree with you (obviously), but I'm not sure we should invoke "descriptivism vs prescriptivism" here. As far as I understand that distinction is mostly applicable to English (or other natural language) teaching, which is us
468.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
Note that this "regex", unlike the ones in the article, is not actually a regular expression. You could perhaps call it an irregular expression. There can be no such thing as a backreference in a regular expression. More info: ht
469.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
Is there still a chance of an eBPF based effort (bpfilter) making nftables unnecessary in the near future?
470.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
Are you sure? As far as I understand, it may happen that everybody stops using the old interface (the distros choose what they compile into their kernels, I guess), and after a few years of that the kernel maintainers may decide to remove t
471.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
Off-topic, but another option for visualizing networks is Graphia. It's a qt5 program that can use the GPU to display pretty large graphs in 3D. https://github.com/graphia-app/graphia https://graphia.ap
472.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
How so? And how is this relevant?
473.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
> Why do you feel so attacked about the subject of this > part of the issue - that these women are not being written about at the same rate as men. The CBC article is plainly an (ignorant) attack on Wikipedia. You say yourself that th
474.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
> > [...] "What I discovered is even women who are meeting these notoriously difficult hurdles of notability are still twice as likely to be considered non-notable and nominated for deletion."" This fact is irrelevant (
475.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
> "Notability" is an idiosyncratic, illogical, fringe, inconsistently-enforced criterion Disregarding the rest of the sentence, would you mind expanding on this? TBH currently your comment just seems flippant, ignorant and with
476.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
The always present whining on HN against Wikipedia's core policies like verifiability and notability perplexes me. Surely most people here are familiar with the notion of maintainability? Insisting on verifiability and notability are m
477.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
> advantage of having unwritable and unreadable syntax There's (in a way) a false dilemma at play here. MathML is unreadable because it's XML, but it is also possible to describe trees in more readable languages like S-expressi
478.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
TeX is a programming language, and a quite peculiar one at that (it's not possible to parse it without executing it, for example); while MathML is merely descriptions of mathematical expressions. The idea of having native support for d
479.
▲
The Naked Society (1964)
(en.wikipedia.org)
3 points
by
nsajko
5y ago
|
0 comments
480.
▲
by
nsajko
5y ago
You're missing the point. You're just throwing insults around (again in this comment), without even letting HN readers know what are you referring to. Why do you think Rob Pike is an arrogant prick, or insufferable? Also note th
More ›