npteljes

21 ms·

541.
by npteljes 1y ago
Not until we solve the discovery and filtering part as well, at the very least. I'd say that is the largest value these platforms bring to the table, hand in hand with their existing network too of course.
542.
by npteljes 1y ago
>just as we now store more text than we will ever read. Yet, we are not reading, but hanging on social sites instead. Same with this supposed video cache. People go to YouTube not because of the platform, but because of other people. As
543.
by npteljes 1y ago
https://wiki.servarr.com/
544.
by npteljes 1y ago
>This should be illegal. I agree. Governments relying on private parties at such a degree is a disservice to the public they serve. As an alternative, or mirror, it's fine to upload, but to use Facebook, Xitter, YouTube as primary s
545.
by npteljes 1y ago
>Stuff is pretty unwatchable now without them. Subscribe to Premium, and the Google ads are gone. I think it's only fair, given how vast and complex YouTube is as a service.
546.
by npteljes 1y ago
>the battle for Linux as THE desktop OS was sabotaged by its most ardent practitioners. Don't believe that for a second. Industry de-facto standards are a result of power dynamics, and the actual users of the thing wield orders of m
547.
by npteljes 1y ago
Data can have malware, like jpeg, png or documents. The browser is not entirely self-contained, for some things it relies on system components, like decoding video. What protects you, I think, besides your undoubtedly good practices, is her
548.
by npteljes 1y ago
I kinda agree with you, more boots is not really an ideal way to achieve this. Worker protections should come from the government itself, so much so that there is no need to form unions, like how it is at many places in Europe. I don't
549.
by npteljes 1y ago
I fail to see the issue with that as well. The sentiment I often see online is that "fewer rules = more freedom". And as I grew more experienced, I find that the opposite is true. In a lot of cases, freedom is upheld by the rules
550.
by npteljes 1y ago
Same with alcohol too. >I didn’t understand the appeal My personal appeals are the anticipation of the next dose, and the initial rush I get from it. I feel smart, motivated, and capable during this rush. Aside from this, I think the sme
551.
by npteljes 1y ago
I like this saying a lot, but I have found the opposite by experience. I stopped drinking coffee recently, and frankly, I found that coffee didn't add much positives to me, aside from the feeling of looking forward to drug myself. The
552.
by npteljes 1y ago
Alright, let me try to connect those dots! Question: "If a business, after unionizing, ultimately delivers more value per dollar to the end customer… then why would anyone even need to write essays arguing for it?" Argument: This
553.
by npteljes 1y ago
I wholeheartedly agree. I have both a hard time to grasp when others are using analogies, especially when they use phrases that are wrong in the public consciousness, like "fish rots from the head" - no, fish rots from the softer
554.
by npteljes 1y ago
The argument is: "people are not rational", by which I mean that in people, there are multiple forces at play, rationality being just one of them. Circling back to the original argument, I followed that because of this, businesses
555.
by npteljes 1y ago
How does a union have an effect on what you described? Can't a union worker not be fired for poor performance?
556.
by npteljes 1y ago
Do arguments using logic, rationales etc convince people actually? Far from a 100% success in my experience. There is a myriad of non-rational behaviors that get in the way of rationality, for example, denial. I believe that people can be
557.
by npteljes 1y ago
I believe this is due to local maximums, and people benefiting from the status quo not wanting to give up even a bit of status, at all. Personal development works the same. Even going far back in history, people concluded with certainty tha
558.
by npteljes 1y ago
There are multiple arguments in your comment. If what you observe here is true, then those other arguments are what got the comment flagged.
559.
by npteljes 1y ago
Hosted services tend to use censorship, but the way they did the censorship originally can be reverted to a high degree in the model, with "abliteration". Then, if you have access of such a model, that can surely dirty-talk. Or so
560.
by npteljes 1y ago
In retrospect, I agree. I worded it too strongly out of emotion. "Everyone could be the product of a service, free or not" would be closer to what I think. The message being that if being a product is important to a would-be user,
561.
by npteljes 1y ago
Carteling doesn't work bottom-up. When changes begin (like this one with AI), one of the things an individual can do is to change course as fast as they can. There are other strategies as well, not evolving is also one, but some strate
562.
by npteljes 1y ago
Unfortunately this is just anecdotal. I also did many things in my life that were risky, and I got away with them every single time. This doesn't prove that they were not risky, or that my results are reproducible. That said, I also ha
563.
by npteljes 1y ago
This is a tired, and untrue cliché. Everyone is the product, all the time.
564.
by npteljes 1y ago
I don't think that .ai is automatically filtered in this case, it's more of a case by case basis. But it's killer nevertheless. "Adult themes" for example is a large umbrella at OpenDNS, and for example I wanted to
565.
by npteljes 1y ago
What do you use to look for products, and businesses? I also use chatbots much more, but these are two categories where I found search engines to be much better. But I haven't really looked for an alternative either.
566.
by npteljes 1y ago
Many workplaces use a corporate firewall, and on the admin panel, they can enable-disable categories of websites, like "Porn", "Adult themes", "Gambling", "Social", "Video streaming", "
567.
by npteljes 1y ago
I have trouble with the notion "understanding". I get the usefulness of the word, but I don't think that we are capable to actually understand. I also think that we are not even able to test for understanding - a good imitati
568.
by npteljes 1y ago
This is the same thing I realized when being a "game master" of the shooter matches we used to hold on my previous project. The end goal of that play was fun, not to determine who has the most technical skill. After realizing this
569.
by npteljes 1y ago
Could also mean more insurance. In case nothing happens, insurance complexity seems overprotection, but when something happens, nothing is too much for people to get back whatever value is lost.
570.
by npteljes 1y ago
This is great. The more players are on this, the more visible this effort is, the more the bugs will get fixed and developers incentivized to support SteamOS. Valve is in a real position to dethrone Windows as the de-facto PC platform. Such

More ›