nprateem

49 ms·

931.
by nprateem 3y ago
Make it part of PR reviews. These are org issues though, not AI issues.
932.
by nprateem 3y ago
You get the devs to write bullet points alongside the code and run it through AI in the build pipeline to turn it into prose.
933.
by nprateem 3y ago
AI will destroy tech writers.
934.
by nprateem 3y ago
Technology seems to turn everything into cottage industries eventually.
935.
by nprateem 3y ago
The point is JWTs can be validated independently on the server, no DB lookup is required. In distributed systems, that's the main benefit - they don't all need to talk to the auth server, just have a certificate that can be used t
936.
by nprateem 3y ago
Or we could ban private yachts, planes, etc and plant millions of trees to literally hedge against the tech not working
937.
by nprateem 3y ago
Unless you're planning to pay for it with an asset whose value fluctuates wildly.
938.
by nprateem 3y ago
> 10% of people also experience visual disturbances like perceiving visual static, lightning, or flashes of light. Some people may also experience heat, strange feelings in their torso, or a feeling of electrical tinglings that ascends t
939.
by nprateem 3y ago
Well hindsight is 50/50. The company probably never thought they'd almost commit suicide.
940.
by nprateem 3y ago
What's that got to do with it driving people away from speculative assets?
941.
by nprateem 3y ago
More specifically now you can get actual real money by putting your savings in a bank account (and most people are struggling to pay the increased cost of living), there's less incentive to throw it away in a casino.
942.
by nprateem 3y ago
This is a lot of jumping up and down over nothing. Think about it when the deal was on the table: 1) Take the money. If OpenAI fail, MS get the code. OK, who cares, OpenAI have gone bust. 2) Don't take the money, don't become succ
943.
by nprateem 3y ago
Yeah this happened recently. Some Russian guy almost started a civil war, but then just apologised and everything went back to normal. I can't remember what happened to him, but I'm sure he's OK...
944.
by nprateem 3y ago
In favour of the CEO who was about to make them fabulously wealthy. FTFY.
945.
by nprateem 3y ago
If the board are concerned about safety, this will never happen.
946.
by nprateem 3y ago
Yeah but I have access to various APIs, it doesn't mean I own them or the IP behind them. Does tech transfer really mean MSFT can launch their own competitor off the back of OpenAI's tech? If Altman permitted such ownership no inv
947.
by nprateem 3y ago
Satya's todo list: 1. Hire Altman and co to prevent share price bloodbath (and reach new heights) 2. Gradually strangle OpenAI's access to compute resources to ensure their failure 3. Prevent competitors saving OpenAI due to conti
948.
by nprateem 3y ago
MS are minority shareholders in Open AI. What stupid agreements did OpenAI sign to give them IP rights, or are you just making things up? Maybe I should ping all the tech companies I own shares in to get them to send me their IP too
949.
by nprateem 3y ago
I wouldn't call starting from zero forking
950.
by nprateem 3y ago
It is mission critical, just not the SaaS version.
951.
by nprateem 3y ago
One doesn't simply 'fork' a business unless it has no/trivial IP, which OpenAI does not.
952.
by nprateem 3y ago
I wouldn't be surprised if this is the chief scientist getting annoyed the CEO is taking all the credit for the work and the researchers aren't getting as much time in the limelight. It's probably the classic 'Meatloaf v
953.
by nprateem 3y ago
> Which in turn now creates the threat that a for-profit version of OpenAI dominates the market with no higher purpose. If it was so easy to go to the back of the queue and become a threat, Open AI wouldn't be in the dominant positi
954.
by nprateem 3y ago
The ex dividend date just passed
955.
by nprateem 3y ago
I don't think you know what intellectual property is.
956.
by nprateem 3y ago
Buddhism
957.
by nprateem 3y ago
"Science" is "The observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena." Things investigated by science are not in themselves science. That doesn't make them
958.
by nprateem 3y ago
If you believe chi to be some kind of pseudoscience rather than something easily experienced you're in no position to tell us how it relates to what's being discussed here, as you demonstrate your ignorance.
959.
by nprateem 3y ago
So now the scientific community accepts chi. About time. The reality of bioenergy is obvious to anyone who's practiced chi kung or experienced their chakras.
960.
by nprateem 3y ago
But it's exactly the case. As I pointed out in another comment, more senior managers may not know or care about you individually to sack you, but instead you get caught as departments are cut to reflect strategic changes. It's sim

More ›