npn

7 ms·

61.
by npn 4mo ago
How? edit: now I read the article fully, seems like they utilize some very effective MTP algorithm. and somehow the quality is still decent enough. though, I doubt that the quality really only drip a bit like they claimed. maybe for the ben
62.
by npn 4mo ago
On the other hand, google does not lose all the money in that deal. Computation is still expensive. So at most they lose like 200M each month. Peanut compares to the potentially gain of the IPO.
63.
by npn 4mo ago
Is this somehow satire? This is just the dgx spark with keyboard and monitor in a convenient format. Since it has more stuff, I'm sure that the price mark up will increase too. Up to $5000 because why not? With that money you can build
64.
by npn 4mo ago
from what I understand, it's because unlike the other models, MAI models haven't yet fine-tuned against the synthetic datasets specifically designed to boost the benchmark scores.
65.
by npn 4mo ago
I personally do not like Microsoft, but congrats them to release this model. While the scores are not good compare to other open weight model, the important thing to note is their training data (as they claimed) is very clean, without any s
66.
by npn 4mo ago
I bought one AMD MI50 32GB back then when they were sold rather cheap (around $150-$170). it can easily generate over 70 tokens per second for gemma 4 26B moe model (q4). I have no doubt that we will have another wave of cheap retired serve
67.
by npn 5mo ago
we all know it is impossible goal to make. surely AI will be even more useful in the future, but as long as china exists and continue to undercut the price, the goal will be never meet. > We're talking about a world where you need 5
68.
by npn 5mo ago
Finally some good news. There are a lot of niche products (like handheld emulators or pocket devices) are on verge of collapse right now due to the ram price. I was waiting for a new GPD win max with amd hx 385 or newer CPU. But they are ho
69.
by npn 5mo ago
because for most people they don't need what deno promises. me for example only use nodejs or bun to run a basic sveltekit server, so it can render the html for the first time. all core functionalities are delegated to backend services
70.
by npn 5mo ago
I sell service. Imagine my users have to pay 4x more for marginal increment just 'cause. They are more willing to wait though, so Chinese models are pretty attractive right now.
71.
by npn 5mo ago
The 09-2025 preview was awesome.
72.
by npn 5mo ago
The premise is if they stop training new models then it will become pure profit after 2 years when the hardware finished paying for itself. It's pretty funny that everyone say that this business is unsustainable, but I have yet seen an
73.
by npn 5mo ago
Weird, last time I checked it was right on the pricing page. But even when it happens I doubt it would be as cheap as it is right now. Enjoy it while it lasts!
74.
by npn 5mo ago
I don't really sure, but might be they count hardware purchase as loss, too. Google has just recently upgraded their TPUs.
75.
by npn 5mo ago
It is insanely profitable though, if you cut out r&d cost, plus the marketing and loss leaders. Don't let them gaslight you. Even anthropic who does not own any hardware still have a big margin providing claude models.
76.
by npn 5mo ago
Unlike other providers, Deepseek does promise that they will lower the price when their Huawei cards arrive in a few more months.
77.
by npn 5mo ago
Nah, it costs what you are willing to pay.
78.
by npn 5mo ago
The price is crazy. And I guess Gemini 3.5 pro will have the pricing increment, too. 12 x 5 = 60? It seems like google does want us to use Chinese models.
79.
by npn 5mo ago
that is the point. rewrite is fine when - you take your sweet time doing that - you still know full well the codebase that will ensure the new codebase can still be well understood and can continue to grow in foreseeable future or you can j
80.
by npn 5mo ago
farewell, bun.
81.
by npn 5mo ago
If they read the source code of unrar, or in this case, using genai (which obviously included unrar source code in its training set) then yes. You can check the agreement for unrar source code release.
82.
by npn 5mo ago
Rar is proprietary. Good luck.
83.
by npn 6mo ago
you know, if you don't have to pay insane salary for your top engineers, and don't have to pay billions for internet shills to control the narrative, then all of the labs will be insane profitable.
84.
by npn 6mo ago
This is a copypasta right? I'm damn confident I have read the same content before.
85.
by npn 6mo ago
the last time US wanted some country to reset back to Stone Age the same thing happened. turn out those aircrafts are not undefeatable at all.
86.
by npn 7mo ago
20 years.
87.
by npn 7mo ago
turn out the schizos were right. most of OpenAI *real* investment money comes from Gulf countries. without that money flow they can't sustain the cash burn anymore.
88.
by npn 7mo ago
Faster is not always the best thing. I still remember when vs code changed to ripgrep I had to change my habit using it, before then I can just open vs code to any folder and do something with it, even if the folder contains millions of sma
89.
by npn 7mo ago
A part of internet dies with him. RIP.
90.
by npn 7mo ago
Now it is only age verification. Next they will try to impose digital ID. That's when you know the new world has begun.

More ›