noxer

86 ms·

811.
by noxer 6y ago
Because you dont use an add blocker? Also sponsorblock to skip in-video garbage intros/outros etc. Shows where they are in the seek-bar as well
812.
by noxer 6y ago
>if you encounter problems with your USB-C devices you might want to try to flip the connector. I have a Lumia 950 (one of the first USB-C phones) and a short USB-A to USB-C (or apple) cable/adapter. One orientation does not charge
813.
by noxer 6y ago
Its called "accountability", something mainstream journalism doesn't seem to have in most places. Its just a fact that biased "news" get more clicks and thus more money. Its hard to define when "faking" st
814.
by noxer 6y ago
Its specific to the kind of blockchain/DLT that it runs on. If you use an DEX that doesn't rely on miners who can pick Tx then you dont have this problem. For example the XRPL DEX does not allow any party to pick which order to ex
815.
by noxer 6y ago
But its not about evidence. Its about shifting public opinion. There is and most probably never will be a law that prevents people from sharing/liking/commenting or otherwise trigger the algorithms to spread something based on the
816.
by noxer 6y ago
Author completely misses the point of these NFTs They are collectibles and by buying the NFT you can transfer them purely digital to anyone. Its rather irrelevant if there is an url pointing to something. The value solely comes from the fac
817.
by noxer 6y ago
The people who are offended mostly aren't even the people who would get any kind of compensation. They are offended on behalf of others.
818.
by noxer 6y ago
Its perfectly fine between humans as well. The difference between humans an machines is, one can and should give consent the other not.
819.
by noxer 6y ago
Can someone already sue them. This crap isn't solving anything. Do we need multiple valuable business ruined by google so a lawsuit can finally hurt them in a way that they start to fix this sh*t.
820.
by noxer 6y ago
The paper is linked on the page > https://xrpl.org/assets/pdf/xrpl-sustainability-methodology-... The conversation is just multiplied yes.
821.
by noxer 6y ago
Its the other way around. Money is just a made up thing to reduce friction in the economy. Think of an economy where people would still need to "buy" stuff with other stuff. That would waste a lot more energy and straight out woul
822.
by noxer 6y ago
https://xrpl.org/carbon-calculator.html As expected PoW is by far the worst. Worse than paper money.
823.
by noxer 6y ago
But you dont need PoW for being decentralized, permission less and censorship resistant. See https://xrpl.org/carbon-calculator.html instead and ignore visa/mastercard PoW is still the worst even worse than than paper
824.
by noxer 6y ago
Here is something similar with more different technologies https://xrpl.org/carbon-calculator.html (scroll to the bottom) Compares BTC/ETH/XRP/VISA/MASTERCARD and Paper Money I wound not interpret too mu
825.
by noxer 6y ago
Half of them are debatable and the rest is true but useless. You gain nothing from using a system that's 12 year old over one that's 6 years old. Also more nodes just dont add any usefulness anymore at some point, it just more not
826.
by noxer 6y ago
See XRPL.org its nether PoW nor PoS its decentral ordering by voting named FBA (Federated Byzantine Agreement) Many projects and tokens use it by now.
827.
by noxer 6y ago
Well they could become an integral part, so nothing wrong with that. However it would not be bitcoin. The projects who actually work with financial institutions have one thing in common, they dont use PoW. You can read it every day, most po
828.
by noxer 6y ago
Wait, people actually read the text under the headlines? /s
829.
by noxer 6y ago
Ripple is a company. The XRPL is fully functional since many years.
830.
by noxer 6y ago
The governments sole purpose is to benefit the people (yes I know that far from reality) But which gov would endorse the use of BTC knowing that it harms the people, removes their own power and if we go back to sticks and stones would even
831.
by noxer 6y ago
>The question was: "What exactly is the "threat" of forks?" Yes uncertainty was the answer. If a fork happens you dont know which side is going to die or if both keep going on. You dont know which sides coin someone w
832.
by noxer 6y ago
Go to XRPL.org its literally that and it exists since like 2013, It whole goal back then was to make a better bitcoin. Plenty other projects have adapted the concept or even forked the code. The core team behind this back when it was named
833.
by noxer 6y ago
unwanted/unplanned forking is a "threat" in the sense that it causes uncertainty. Idk about this specific project and how they handle this but for example the XRPL has amendments which come with software update but are not en
834.
by noxer 6y ago
Far more likely is that these businesses like Tesla would be the very first to dump and probably make good profit on it. They have zero incentives to keep it running if they are informed in advance that the goal is to crush the price. I hav
835.
by noxer 6y ago
Permissioned in that case simply means private (you need a permission to participate). It does not mean non-distributed. It also doesn't mean any entity with permission can add anything and its accepted. That would just be a shared&#x2
836.
by noxer 6y ago
There where hugely popular deflationary assets in the past. Gold and Silver would also only go up in value over time if people would see it as more profitable than anything else. But reality kicks in at some point. PMs still goes up in valu
837.
by noxer 6y ago
If it would have anywhere near a direct effect on our daily life that alone would have such a negative effect on the price that it would instantly crash. The price and more so the ever increasing price is the only thing that keeps it alive
838.
by noxer 6y ago
Don't worry it IS defensively self correcting no matter who joins and for what reason. To keep it going forever it would need endless quadratic grows which is not possible. Also there are solutions without PoW/PoS, they use FBA in
839.
by noxer 6y ago
We have DEXs and it didn't take 10 years only 5 or so. There is plenty more stuff only possible with DLTs. By the time mainstream uses its products they wont know it runs on DLTs just like people using tiktok dont know it runs on TCP&#
840.
by noxer 6y ago
DLTs (blockchains) solve the double spending problem in a decentral (trustless) way. Thats "the definition" and what separates it from other similar tech like git, a synced databases or a write-only database. PoW/PoS are just

More ›