noxer

41 ms·

421.
by noxer 5y ago
lol you can expect whatever form FB but they dont care. And if you gave access to the data to other people FB cant and wont do anything to prevent thous people from accessing the data and if access is possible scraping is too.
422.
by noxer 5y ago
The plastic recycling-lie is the reason and the problem here. See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28025475
423.
by noxer 5y ago
I'm aware of that. It also loads a DLL from windows10 installer. I assume it intentional so the files can be updated if MS would add more checks. It's open source for a reason.
424.
by noxer 5y ago
They could stop sending out (ad) data any time so no one could collect the data. Its their platform they can do whatever they want.
425.
by noxer 5y ago
Still not FBs business. If I copy my friend private photos they would not care either. They are not representing my friend interest neither legally nor in any other way.
426.
by noxer 5y ago
Browser plug-ins I install on my browser are not FBs or any other companies business. I consent when I installed it and gave it the permissions.
427.
by noxer 5y ago
It means Chinese Communist Party and is usual used as synonym for China if the focus is on the authoritarian regime rather than the people or the land. Only like 6% of the people in China are part of the CCP.
428.
by noxer 5y ago
Can people stop already. Its NOT true. Windows 11 runs perfectly fine without. There is no enforcement at all. All the hardware checks are in the setup/installer which is not needed its just one way to install the OS and ofc it can be
429.
by noxer 5y ago
See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28025410 Even if blew out of the the garbage truck (which is not possible they are closed) it would just end up on the street which is then cleaned with another truck or washed into
430.
by noxer 5y ago
All this would do is incentivize fraud. Clearly I can find a way to buy these bags for under $0.90 since their real value is almost zero so I could generate money by wasting bags.
431.
by noxer 5y ago
>In the US and Europe we tend to have well developed municipal waste systems and only a small portion of our plastic waste ends up in the ocean. Thats exactly what I said >The problem is the rest of the places that do not. There are m
432.
by noxer 5y ago
>99% chance this is wrong, just because you placed it into garbage big does not mean it wasn't shipped off to china to a poorly managed facility and didn't end up in the ocean My trash is burned locally there is zero chance it
433.
by noxer 5y ago
The aluminum cans are stolen because they actually have a intrinsic value. The plastic bag does not and there is no way to artificially add value to it so people collect and return them. >Glass is sand -- throw it in the deep ocean or pi
434.
by noxer 5y ago
Its the same reason as allays, some kind of subsidies. Created by politicians who are fooled/bribed by lobbyists. Same reason the US replaces certain % of fuel with bio-fuel. It does make any sense. It pollutes more to create the bio-f
435.
by noxer 5y ago
> All the confounding circumstances are controlled. How can you control everything? These studies do not control what no one thought about that it could have an effect. Its impossible to control everything.
436.
by noxer 5y ago
No, that would be unbiased^^
437.
by noxer 5y ago
It's PR nonsense. They dont want anyone not working for them to work for them.
438.
by noxer 5y ago
Either way they play arbiter with no transparency as to how they do it. They mostly outsource the "truth finding" but then pay them so its all a huge mess and simply not what people want them to do. I dont use FB but I would not w
439.
by noxer 5y ago
"This claim about fact-checking was disputed."
440.
by noxer 5y ago
You have to differ between use-case and tech A good use-case likely does not work on the popular tech that we have today. Like the original use-case of p2p-money (ignore if this use-case actually makes sense or not). It does not work with b
441.
by noxer 5y ago
No you missed the point. There was never any comparisons between BTC any other "money". There was just your claim that no one could take away you BTC which is true but irrelevant because you dont want the BTC you want the value. W
442.
by noxer 5y ago
I called out whats wrong in your logic. I never claimed anything about fiat/stock or whatever. Its irrelevant, the only point you made FOR bitcoin (namely that no one can take it away from you) is moot because the value can still go aw
443.
by noxer 5y ago
>If I lock 1BTC up in an encrypted wallet, nobody can deprive me of that 1BTC without my consent and participation. That is the killer app. And that's where you went wrong. Its not "nobody" instead its everybody who partic
444.
by noxer 5y ago
Does it matter? BTC and ETH are the version 1 of something "new". The version one is the playground. There is plenty demand for ETH/BTC like systems without the inefficiencies and so people are building better systems. Flare
445.
by noxer 5y ago
And another useless article of crypto (bitcoin) hate. It was getting boring the last 10 times already can HN move on? Thanks.
446.
by noxer 5y ago
>The great majority of the world's population lives in countries with per capita emissions less than a third of the US's So what? Emissions are global and rising especially in the places where most people live (Asia). If emissi
447.
by noxer 5y ago
You put the @username (the @ is optional) in the search field then click on the user and send a message. Once a message is send the chat will obviously stay in the chat list. Same for public groups/channels. Alternatively you can share
448.
by noxer 5y ago
Maybe read the message I replied to before making such a nonsensical reply that has absolute nothing to do with what I asked the person above.
449.
by noxer 5y ago
This would not be a classics sting operation. The seller already committed the crime(s) by offering it. Sting operation usually are the reason someone could commit a crime by creating a bait crime opportunity.
450.
by noxer 5y ago
Illegal is defined by law and laws applied to a subset of people. What do you think the police does with illegal substances? Not confiscating them because "owning" it is illegal? No, the police does not take ownership the state do

More ›