notrealyme123

4 ms·

31.
by notrealyme123 4mo ago
It failed visible for it security and bio/chemistry stuff. It sabotaged invisible for "frontier" ML research. Its not a switch to a cheaper model. They tried to actively harm progress.
32.
by notrealyme123 4mo ago
exactly for cybersecurity the failure was visible. It was not visible for "Frontier" ML Research. The argument of headstart in it security is no feasible here.
33.
by notrealyme123 4mo ago
That should be higher
34.
by notrealyme123 4mo ago
Sure. IMO a lot of people will not touch fable again. The risk is to high. If they don't want the model to be good in some field they shouldn't train it on it. This whole thing feels like an advertisement for the Mythos release wh
35.
by notrealyme123 4mo ago
It burned through all of my tokens in a very short time. I wonder if it their ML mitigations leads to model into deadlocks.
36.
by notrealyme123 4mo ago
I am a AI Researcher at a university. I tried Fable for my current project, but i feel it missunderstands me a bit to often. Now i don't know if i am using it wrong, or anthropic tries to slow my research. That model is a big no no.
37.
by notrealyme123 4mo ago
You come up with a hypothesis -> you let fable implement it -> fable sabotages your experiment -> you get evidence that hypothesis is not true. It's that simple.
38.
by notrealyme123 4mo ago
This send chills down my spine. For now I will not use Fable in my research. The risks of being sabotaged by the model are not worth it.
39.
by notrealyme123 4mo ago
What do the locals have from a higher price?
40.
by notrealyme123 4mo ago
2FA did not help according to the primary finding https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48359102
41.
by notrealyme123 4mo ago
Much appreciated
42.
by notrealyme123 5mo ago
Usually coding where the closed loop evaluation takes time. E.g code debugging
43.
by notrealyme123 5mo ago
Can you recommend a good starting point other than Daniel Dennet? I have the same assumption about Cognitive sciences, which I try to get a better understanding.
44.
by notrealyme123 5mo ago
I understand your points and I think there is a chance of this going wrong. Especially with the current incentive structure behind it. I personally hate smartphones because the incentive there is to get people's attention and sell it.
45.
by notrealyme123 5mo ago
The GRAM model is so much into my research direction, I love it. Thank you for posting it. Where do I find papers like this? Outside of hacker news comments. It's so hard to find the good stuff in all the noise IMO.
46.
by notrealyme123 5mo ago
Readable reasoning traces are a convenient thing, but they don't have to be true in any way. It's actually dangerous to think that.
47.
by notrealyme123 5mo ago
I just don't see any reason to actively search for a problem. Yes it's new technology and contradicts "the old ways". People have made music before, and I hardly believe they only made It for other people, but als themse
48.
by notrealyme123 5mo ago
That's very black and white. They don't pay "lots" of taxes. They pay taxes for the two engineers and 8 janitors working there.
49.
by notrealyme123 5mo ago
That's very close to a coin flip.
50.
by notrealyme123 5mo ago
Because company profits are booked at their European HQ (so Ireland or Luxembourg). So there is little profit being taxed at the Datacenter/country Level.
51.
by notrealyme123 5mo ago
Bonhoeffer's Theory of Stupidity hits the nail on the head here. He argued that in WW2, the people who were not able to question what they were doing were enabling a lot of the cruelty [0]. [0] https://bigthink.com/thin
52.
by notrealyme123 5mo ago
The drug dealer is a potential very bad decision in the making. And a potentially very interesting one for a young person. The internet can also contain potentially very bad decisions. I don't want to argue to block the internet, but
53.
by notrealyme123 5mo ago
Not to be to overly reductive, but you could use the same argument for drugs and weapons.
54.
by notrealyme123 5mo ago
Sounds ridiculous, but yes. They earn "something" via their exclusive advertisement spots here. I guess the daily active users are something else though.
55.
by notrealyme123 6mo ago
I know it's not the perfect solution for you, but I use a voice recorder and send the LLM the transcript. And my god is it working great. Usually I just explain the things I want it to do. The longest was 30 minutes rambling of explain
56.
by notrealyme123 6mo ago
So would be your leaked medical record. The point is not that this situation seems absurd. The point is that we need some point where we say whats ok or not. And by ignoring licensing of public code already we moved it closer to the worse e
57.
by notrealyme123 6mo ago
Things being public should not be enough. just because someone leaked your medical information to the public via a data breach should not make it fair game. There should be some rules.
58.
by notrealyme123 6mo ago
User publishes to github => Copilot trains with GitHub data => MS Sells copilot => User workes for Microsoft (in the sense of giving it's labour for MS to make money) User publishes to github => Deepseek trains with GitHub
59.
by notrealyme123 6mo ago
I am to be honest not sure what I am more scared. AI shaping warfare Vs. Using AI to justify outrageous warfare
60.
by notrealyme123 6mo ago
With that reasoning every action would be justified to stop scammers. Google should capture all your calls and check if there could be scamming going on, right? The current malware situation at android store situation does not help to carry

More ›