Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nothinkjustai
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
61.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
I doubt those SWEs could have used anything other than JS.
62.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
If someone was to deface this statue would they face legal action? It’s kind of an interesting thought, side if it really was just put up without the city’s authority it would be okay, and if it wasn’t it defeats the entire point. “Rage aga
63.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
Yeah that’s the thing, pretty much all the people who are really into ai for everything are JavaScript/Typescript developers, usually working at startups, and often in the AI field.
64.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
> Rust afficionados are some combination of people who came to Rust early and never learned traditional software design and don't know what they're missing, and people who were raised on traditional good software engineering bu
65.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
No, there are contexts where you do not get value out of it. Don’t speak for others.
66.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
Some say verbose, some say explicit. I had the complete opposite reaction to Rust than this other person, and I don’t think I’m particularly smart so I don’t think it’s purely a matter of intelligence. Even asynchronous rust is pretty easy
67.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
Well, if belief can exist separate from evidence, why be atheist instead of agnostic?
68.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
I want the drugs you’re on :D
69.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
lol. so he spends his life arguing about the amount of proof required to believe god exists, yet requires no proof besides feelings to believe an AI is sentient?
70.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
Animals, right? Because LLMs have none of those qualities.
71.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
Interesting that the talk was quite different, because this clearly AI generated article was condescending and infuriating. Quite a difference apparently.
72.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
NFTs are stupid. But I have a feeling as governments default on their debt and economies collapse in the next few decades cryptocurrencies will be of increasing importance.
73.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
Looking at the code briefly, the first example could be written as let msg = timeout(Duration::from_secs(2), receiver.next()).await.ok()??; // not shown in article, but next line of code let Message::Text(frame) = msg
74.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
Um, it’s pretty obvious why Result<Option<Result<Option<T>>>> or Result<(),()> is bad, I’m not going to spend time explaining when I doubt you’re asking in good faith.
75.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
that’s a pretty big oversimplification. it means that the way you do one thing is indicative of the type of person you are. if someone cheats on their wife, don’t trust them as a business partner. if someone puts in a lot of effort into a g
76.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
Basically all of the code they shared in the article.
77.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
It’s not a logical error, just common sense. Eg. how you do one thing is how you do everything.
78.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
Except it generated bad unidiomatic code, so you’re just learning bad habits.
79.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
Um? Person vibe codes Rust. Output is stupid. The conclusion is either a) Vibe coding produces bad code b) Rust is weird Somehow we’re supposed to accept b as the answer? Give me a break….
80.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
Hah and people still make the argument LLMs and brains work the same lol
81.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
CC is not better than Codex, nor is it better than OpenCode, Crush, Pi etc…
82.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
The arrogance of anybody, let alone a designer , thinking they could build something better than the foundations of software (and the modern world itself) is crazy. I love it, but you have to deliver or else I will mock you :P
83.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
You are setting the bar in a way that makes “functional equivalence” unfalsifiable. If by “functionally equivalent” you mean “can produce similar linguistic outputs in some domains,” then sure we’re already there in some narrow cases. But t
84.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
Sympathy?? I’m glad it happened and I hope it happens again lmao
85.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
We very obviously are not just a series of weights for probable next tokens. Like seriously, you can even ask an LLM and it will tell you our brains work differently to it, and that’s not even including the possibility that we have a soul o
86.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
Yeah people don’t understand that if you put an LLM in a position where it’s plausible that a human might drop the DB, it very well might do that since it’s a likely next step. Ahahaha
87.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
Ahaha deserved, and it’s also railway, the company who’s CEO brags about spending $300,000 each month on Claude and says programmers are cooked. Hahahaha I hope it keeps happening. In fact, I hope it gets worse.
88.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
Idk, I tried Linux last year and couldn’t get my USB wifi to work, even bought a new one that claimed to support Linux, and even tried an entirely new distro (went from Arch to Mint) and still had major problems. Windows handled it just fin
89.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
Ai comments are banned here.
90.
▲
by
nothinkjustai
6mo ago
> Putin and the like By this you just mean your political enemies?
More ›