Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
notheguyouthink
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
61.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
> What do you mean by “being full access”? In general I just meant that the GUI would attempt to reduce assumptions and be as flexible as possible. Ie, I would want to be able to control multiple cursors. Control multiple highlights. etc
62.
▲
Ask HN: How to identify programmatic ways to help your community?
3 points
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
|
2 comments
63.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
On this note, do any of these nice GUI editors provide a good API for control of the buffer contents, multiple cursor positions, multiple highlights, etc? I'd love to experiment with various editing models but hate the idea of implemen
64.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
I don't know anything about economy, so this is a question not.. a counter, but: > In a functioning market, local suppliers are likely to raise prices in response to the tariffs, as they face less competition. Is that entirely bad
65.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
I guess I misunderstood your idea of artificial, apologies. I thought you meant meaningless, rather than manmade, constructed, etc. In that context yes I agree, they are artificial.
66.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
Like I mentioned here[1], data caps don't serve to truly limit bandwidth congestion though. If you oversold your pipe by 50 users, totally 150 users, and all 150 are online at 5pm your data cap is not helping. Furthermore, even if thos
67.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
> Because from a networking point of view, data caps is an artificial thing. How so? If I limit you to 1MB a month, good luck clogging my pipes. I said it's not an effective method of approaching the problem, so I'm not defendi
68.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
I'm very anti-Comcast, so this isn't a defense.. BUT, aren't data caps.. fine? Nothing is unlimited, so why pretend you can get an unlimited amount of data? Now that doesn't mean data caps themselves are the right soluti
69.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
I mean, increasing what's given for the same price doesn't equate to nobility or generosity or anything. Even the most evil dictator wants to keep their people from rioting. If anything, Comcast's past behaviors warrants not
70.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
Isn't that always true though? This is just one additional layer of trust. Sure, there are reasonable layers we should care about, but you're rarely, if ever, going to be doing everything and trust everything. Ie: > If you didn
71.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
Appreciate your insight!
72.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
Or you sell for what you need, when you need it. Ie, if I had the coin I was debating buying (~1k coins), I wouldn't remotely need to sell them all now. I could retire off a small amount of them, there's no need to sell them all.
73.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
I was talking with my wife (then gf) about putting $1000 into BTC back when it hit $1. I don't let it eat me up though, I'm not a gambler, and it's quite likely that I would have sold at some point. Though.. if I had my wits,
74.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
I totally agree.. though to play devils advocate, I do have to wonder how different what you describe is from the traditional system. By traditional system, I mean; who is the best lawyer? One who can most effectively manipulate the jury to
75.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
More specifically (or less specifically lol) , do anything with people and leave a positive impression. Seeking friendship is hard, it's something forged with time - like any relationship. You have to be willing to put in the effort o
76.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
Hell, I don't know how production-friendly it is, but it sounds like clay[1] will even give you http-json endpoints without setting up a 2nd server. [1]: https://github.com/utrack/clay edit : If you're using
77.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
Since you brought it up, what are your (or anyone in-the-know's) opinions on transferring large (~GB) files via gRPC? I recently implemented my first gRPC service and while it went nicely, I ended up writing a somewhat gross HTTP s
78.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
Well I was replying in the context of someone saying there is a meaningful difference to a gateway vs a node. If you access content via a gateway, your content is hosted by IPFS. The content gains all the benefits of IPFS, but you, the vi
79.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
Besides, aren't all nodes basically a gateway? Ie, a gateway is effectively just a readonly node on an accessible IP. Any node could be this if not bound the local net.
80.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
I feel like I fall in that camp. I received no formal money training, and frankly saved terribly when I was younger. However, I don't believe education was the problem, I believe maturity was. I still don't know what I'm doin
81.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
> risk averse I'm confused what you mean here - isn't a degree of risk aversion good? I feel like "most people" are incredibly not risk averse, in that they recognize that they have little savings to no savings, eme
82.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
> Do you have any specific suggestions? Perhaps tying pricing to number of contacts/users instead of sheer volume? No specific suggestions, unfortunately. In our experience, I at least preferred when a service was $X/unit for a
83.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
Disclaimer: I don't know the emails. I am immensely curious how you're achieving better delivery rates - I'm browsing through the site now trying to understand this. I say this because at the end of the day, I thought any fai
84.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
I'm confused, with a tagline like "grep with colors!", wouldn't you just use grep if you don't want colors? This feels like complaining that Spotify doesn't have a silent mode for people who dislike sound. 
85.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
I really hope some sort of media subscription service becomes common place. If I want to read articles online, I'd love to pay $10/m and have it go to the content creators. Ads for me are unacceptable, but I'll happily pay, a
86.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
> I’m kidding, of course. It really depends on how well business and development understand each other. Yup. This is the crux of the whole issue, and it's being completely blown out of proportion. There's always going to be det
87.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
> Right now I'm working on a feature that I estimated as 'a couple of hours'. I've been working on it all day by now. Not because the feature is that difficult, or because I didn't get a set of good requirements.
88.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
This is being a little extremist, no? I'm consistently asked to give estimates, and I mostly give estimates that are accurate within sane expectations. I think what's missing here is that I can predict how long something is goin
89.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
Gotcha, appreciate the info! Yea I remember a while back I was looking into the Spotify API and saw those attributes you talked of. Pretty nifty! Appreciate your work! Sad that you're having trouble monetizing off of it.
90.
▲
by
notheguyouthink
8y ago
Does s/he implicitly trust Atlassian? If anything, that comment makes it clear to me that they're staying mobile because they don't implicitly or explicitly trust any of the current providers. I think if they implicitly trust
More ›