notfed

24 ms·

151.
by notfed 2y ago
-1 very obscure format. Here's a great password dictionary that only contains common English words [1]. Use 5 words and you have a 70-bit password. [1] https://github.com/sts10/generated-wordlists
152.
by notfed 2y ago
Same deal with Rust.
153.
by notfed 2y ago
And can I point out how unreasonably difficult it is to prevent physical/paper spam? It blows my mind that our email laws are more restrictive than physical mail.
154.
by notfed 2y ago
If that's true, I'm confused how this is a "double-blind, randomized, controlled trial"? Also, what's up with drug studies always having such a low sample size? Is it really that hard to find people who'd volun
155.
by notfed 2y ago
According to Erowid, a "light" dose is 25ug-75ug, a "standard" dose is 50ug-150ug, and a "heavy" dose is 400ug+.
156.
by notfed 2y ago
Any article/paper claiming nonexistence of dark matter that does not mention the bullet cluster should be sent to the spam folder.
157.
by notfed 2y ago
Couldn't every Boolean operation be "busted" as a lookup table?
158.
by notfed 2y ago
What is this witchcraft? I fear that I have seen something that I cannot unsee...
159.
by notfed 2y ago
From the site: > Exactly-once processing: Messages must be ack'd after they're delivered.
160.
by notfed 2y ago
My point was that this site fits the pattern of a malicious site. I think 99% of people would sooner click out of a malicious site than try to figure out how to "give false information" in the form of a camera permission.
161.
by notfed 2y ago
Feedback: if I hadn't seen this posted here, I'd assume this website is malicious. Asking me for my email, microphone, and camera before you've even showed me anything is a deal breaker 100% of the time. You have to show
162.
by notfed 2y ago
Ack.
163.
by notfed 2y ago
Tangent, but: this reminds me of many philosophical debates, e.g. "do we have free will?". What I've found is that usually what's happening is that the "debaters" assume different definitions of the thing they&
164.
by notfed 2y ago
Well that doesn't seem consistent.
165.
by notfed 2y ago
I do this. And once I had a customer support agent ask for it. The conversation went like this: Agent: "I'll need to ask for a few details first. What was your first pet's name?" Me: "ZD4Fbyed6fzoUcmi" Agent: &
166.
by notfed 2y ago
Underrated, make this into a submission?
167.
by notfed 2y ago
I'd also throw in that HMAC is overrated . It's a workaround for bad hash algorithms that are vulnerable to length-extension attacks. If you're using a "good" hash algorithm, then MAC-ing is simple: hash over your
168.
by notfed 2y ago
Yikes -1 to that. Sounds like a vendors dream anyway, I don't know if that needs to be incentivized.
169.
by notfed 2y ago
As in "sick, bruh!" Or "disturbing"? (There needs to be a "Poe's law" for the word sick.)
170.
by notfed 2y ago
Seriously. Some feedback to author: the page is awesome up to "You've been idle for X seconds." Delete every word after that.
171.
by notfed 2y ago
Does /s apply to the entire comment? A WiFi manager for a text editor is satirical overkill.
172.
by notfed 2y ago
Not sure what you're trying to say here . x25519 is objectively not PQC and never claimed to be, and this isn't debatable.
173.
by notfed 2y ago
Kyber768 is the post-quantum algorithm in that example, not x25519.
174.
by notfed 2y ago
> The x25519 algorithm also plays a role in post-quantum safe cryptographic solutions, having been included as the classical algorithm in the TLS 1.3 and SSH hybrid scheme specifications for post-quantum key agreement. Really though? Thi
175.
by notfed 2y ago
> Alcohol is...the safest [psychoactive drug] Yeah, no. According to CDC data, more than 150,000 people die from excessive alcohol consumption per year [1], which is about how many people died of heroin overdoses in the past 20 years [2]
176.
by notfed 2y ago
Also worth mentioning that, in the time since this article was written, Signal Messenger is now post-quantum secure [1], and has always been free and actually open source. [1] https://signal.org/blog/pqxdh/
177.
by notfed 2y ago
> Once he determined it was not an OSI approved license then that should be the end of it. It's not Open Source. period. Where in OSI's "Open Source Definition" [1] does it say a license must be approved by OSI to be
178.
by notfed 2y ago
Just speculating here but I assume law will answer this with one word: "intent". Did MS design this with the intention of planned obsolescence, or was it reasonable to impractical to avoid?
179.
by notfed 2y ago
That's a really, really dim signal though, right? You literally need a microscope to see the signal.
180.
by notfed 2y ago
It sounds like some people want to pay more money. Good for them. I'm happy to have a cheaper option.

More ›