notepad0x90

12 ms·

91.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
I'll say that I know nothing about this, but just commenting on the economics of it all: Cancer and HIV have been at the forefront of disease research, in terms of public interest and financial investment, and cancer is more like an um
92.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
That tracks, that's all Azure is there to do in the end. If it was easy to manage it myself, I'd do it, and I'd still need to pay them for a VM to host it on, along with traffic costs. But bastion isn't cheap, so somethi
93.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
cool, but the single point of failure (it could be HA-proxy) is the point, it's a choke point. I get both architectures have pros and cons, with the proxy approach you remove secrets from the application environment entirely. Plain HTT
94.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
I've heard one way to acheive this is by using api proxies/gateways. you can store secrets in a vault if you wish, but with a proxy, your app makes requests as usual without using secrets, its requests are then intercepted by the
95.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
Given the bacterial digestion context here, I wonder how consistent bean consumption affects the gut microbiome? Others have mentioned eating beans a lot is the best way to stop the gas, why is that? is it because the bacteria that digest
96.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
I've used it before, setting it up wasn't pleasant with the whole java/tomcat thing, and it kept having severe vulnerabilities.
97.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
This is cool. If it adds session recording and SSO auth support, it can be used as an RDP jumphost. I've used Azure bastion to do just this, you auth to the azure portal using whatever authentication regime is configured for your tenan
98.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
we desperately need an internet-standard for establishing age without disclosing the identity of the user. this is very much possible, and I won't rant here about all the ways it is possible. Currently, meta and openai have hijacked th
99.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
did anyone have any reason to believe that was classified information that was leaked, instead of just a random person speculating? if not, then he had no intent to leak that information. If a random soldier told you, "iran will be nuk
100.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
did he leak the information, or just speculate on it? is it leaking classified info when pentagon officials order lots of pizza and thus inform the world that a military operation is being planned?
101.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
I think "won't fix" should be normalized, even for critical security bugs. Software exists to be used, not to be secure. These are not useless pieces of code. If they were useless, then no one is using them, so there is no se
102.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
There really shouldn't, people don't have to include things in their kernel builds they don't need.
103.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
makes sense, I guess I just meant that it isn't proper normalization without typing. you can have types in something like a sql db (or frames as you pointed out). But a simple CSV, not so much, you'll have to come up with a custom
104.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
I don't fully agree with this, for large nested datasets and arrays. Especially with arrays, what could be one line of JSON, in a CSV you'd have non-normalized array as a string in a single cell, or you expand the array and create
105.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
I have no reason to believe the idea wasn't theirs, neither do you. It's just another dialect, or jargon-set being used for communication. that's about as much as anyone could claim to prove about the post. but here we are de
106.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
I wouldn't make that big of a deal out of it for sure. People already sound that way to me. Everyone saying "have a nice day" when they don't mean it, and don't get me started on office-speak. You don't see me
107.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
In the sense that humans as a species exist, and nation states exist on the same planet, I suppose there is. But sovereign nationhood means a nation isn't subject to any higher earthly organization. Each nation does whatever it wants m
108.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
I just clarified that it was.
109.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
No, I think proposed, draft and internet standard all have specific meanings we don't need to debate over. Your claim that IPv6 was first proposed in 1995 is correct, as is my claim that it was first accepted in 1998. No one actually u
110.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
Not at all, it doesn't even need to be PKI. But if it was, your routers would be the CA. Or more practically, whatever device is responsible for addressing, also responsible as the authority over those addresses. Your DHCP server would
111.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
It wouldn't be a good idea to spell out an entire protocol in a comment section, but the key part is that it would cost a lot. It is far from hand-waving. Right now we have numeric addressing, where routers look at bits and perform ASI
112.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
That's a proposed standard, looks like what obsoletes is the draft standard.
113.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
You know that's not what he meant. the world is always changing. it was designed in 1998 by networking gear companies, with their own company needs in mind. It wasn't engineered with end user, or even network administrators and ap
114.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
> If OP is not a native English speaker and is using an LLM to create a reasonable prose, then it might be the best way for them to try and communicate their ideas. It's probably better than Google translate. It affects how the read
115.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
I think it's better to just adapt to this. A lot of people write the content their own way, and get AI to rewrite it so that it is more readable, and free from errors. Content over appearance and all. I think the problem is you conside
116.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
auditing the code is fairly straightforward if it isn't obfuscated. so long as it doesn't execute dynamic code that is. but the big issue is you can't control when the extension itself gets an update (to my knowledge). and it
117.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
I don't know, to me your sentiment sounds a lot like how back in the day they used to say "you can't just use a calculator all the time, use your brain and show the work on pen and paper". humans have been using tools to
118.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
Yeah, who disagreed with that? "war crime" is not a random term you can throw at things you don't like. you can dislike an atrocity, but you have no right to do anything about it. It's so hypocritical. Not a single post
119.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
I don't think so. at best, it proves that the current israeli government supported hamas to isolate them from palestinians in gaza. it doesn't support a claim that the oct 7 attacks were perpetrated by israel's own government
120.
by notepad0x90 6mo ago
> Yes the international community has an obligation to prevent genocide, and the destruction of a nation state if that coincides with the destruction of its people No, it does not. That's not how sovereignty works. nation states&#x2

More ›