notatrumper

8 ms·

31.
by notatrumper 6y ago
Really? I was under the impression that they tried to take Trump down under the assumption that he won the presidency by illegal means. Seems the same kind of thing to me. Even now they still try to impeach him.
32.
by notatrumper 6y ago
Who says it is the end of the story for Parler? They came on the scene many years after Twitter and Facebook. They have a lot of catching up to do, with a lot less money at their disposal. In the early days, Twitter ran on Ruby on Rails, ha
33.
by notatrumper 6y ago
Difficult to compete with companies that have billions of dollars to spend.
34.
by notatrumper 6y ago
I would assume they simply haven't been around long enough, and didn't have enough money to throw at the issue yet. I hope they will be back, stronger than before.
35.
by notatrumper 6y ago
The millions of people reading the accusations in the newspapers can not easily check the accusations. That is the issue. Yes, copies of his tweets exist, although I am also not sure if they are legal. Iirc Twitter demands that downloaded T
36.
by notatrumper 6y ago
Which seems in this context just like a card blanche to blame anything whatsoever on Trump. As long as he didn't explicitly called for violence, I don't see how he "incited" anything. By that logic you could never critic
37.
by notatrumper 6y ago
What makes you think so?
38.
by notatrumper 6y ago
Should everybody who believed in the Russian Hacker narrative be deleted from Facebook and Twitter? I know it seems like an eternity ago, but we've seen relentless campaigning against Trump on the basis of the Russian Hackers allegatio
39.
by notatrumper 6y ago
They are in their rights to delete whatever they want. Making an accusation of illegal conduct and deleting the evidence goes beyond that, though.
40.
by notatrumper 6y ago
What do you mean? What does it explain? It literally says they interpreted those sentences as incitement to violence?