not_kurt_godel

7 ms·

91.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
And then you're sunk the moment anyone else needs to run your code, or even if you just need to run your own code on another machine.
92.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
Perhaps you should finish reading the threads to discover his numerous self-admissions of limited knowledge and incorrect statements when confronted with people who cite sources
93.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogerpielke/2020/03/10/every-da... > Every Day 10,000 People Die Due To Air Pollution From Fossil Fuels > The NBER study found that “the switch from nuclear power
94.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
If I'm not, then we're not grounded in the same consensus-driven objective reality, making this conversation meaningless, and therefore not worth your time to reply further.
95.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
In technical fields: Accredited formal education, professional certification(s), and/or recognition from other experts in the field who have the same.
96.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
There is also incentive for people to inflate their sense of importance by weighing in on topics they're not qualified on, especially if it's motivated by a sense of familial pride. You can see elsewhere on this thread that arthur
97.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
Do people on the Internet have an incentive to baselessly speculate in order to indulge their own Dunning-Krugerized delusions of grandeur?
98.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
I care enough that I would trust assessment of their health and condition only to qualified professionals with access to the relevant information, just like anyone else that I care about
99.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
That'd be a very interesting statement if you were qualified to make it
100.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
Yep you know better than the people who have the credentials you don't and the access to internal data you don't. I don't see what's holding you back from doing surgery, qualifications and context are no barrier to the a
101.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
So you don't have the necessary credentials, and you still wouldn't be qualified to comment even if you did have them unless you had access to the internal data. But no worries, I'm sure you'd be OK getting surgery from
102.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
I will concede the thrust of my argument probably does not fully align with Fielding's academic definition, so thank you for pointing me to that and explaining it a bit. I'm realizing/remembering now that our internal working
103.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
Deriving a presentation layer from an API definition has no bearing on whether the client has to be stateful or not. The key difference for 'true' HATEOAS is that the API schema is sufficiently descriptive that the client does not
104.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
It's a broader definition of HATEOAS. A stricter interpretation with practical, real-world benefits is a RESTful API definition that is fully self-contained that the client can get in a single request from the server and construct the
105.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
I'm not confusing it. I was heavily motivated by business goals to find a general solution for HATEOAS-ifying API definitions. And yes, a web page, implemented in HTML/CSS/JS is a facsimile for it in a certain sense, but it&#
106.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
...which are a presentation layer and not a semantic, RESTful API definition.
107.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
Your point would be much stronger if all web forms were served in pure HTML and not 95% created by JS SPAs.
108.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
Altering the presentation layer is not the same thing as deriving it from a semantic API definition.
109.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
It's not. The whole point of HATEOAS is that the presentation can be entirely derived from the API definition, full stop.
110.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
I worked on frontend projects and API designs directly related to trying to achieve HATEOAS, in a general, practical sense, for years. Browsing the modern web is not it.
111.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
I appreciate the conceptual analogy, but that's not really HATEOAS. HATEOAS would mean your browser/client would be entirely responsible for the presentation layer, in whatever form you desired, whether it's buttons or forms
112.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
The solution is to use the appropriate tool for the job. If you're locked in to highly crusty legacy software, it's inevitably going to require workarounds. There are good technical reasons why arbitrary-size single-part file uplo
113.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
https://apnews.com/ is a good place to start. In the meantime, perhaps you should refrain from opinionated commenting on current events if your opinion is self-admittedly derived from "clickbait whores".
114.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
I'm sure, then, that you must you have some alternate means of keeping abreast of current events so that your public discourse is grounded in a shared understanding of objective reality. Care to share what those are?
115.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
3 * 0 = 0. Checkmate, aitheists.
116.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
You probably don't need Redis until you have thousands of requests per minute, nevermind per day.
117.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
Agreed. People talk up Claude but every time I try it I wind up coming back to Gemini fairly quickly. And it's good enough at coding to be acceptably close to Claude as well IMO.
118.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
How small are you? How small are you multiplied by 5?
119.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
> Leaving aside the pendatic "you can't be a multiple smaller than another object" Feel free to not leave this out, it's a pet peeve of mine. Thank you for the moment of catharsis.
120.
by not_kurt_godel 1y ago
And in many ways it actually is remarkably meaningfully decentralized - or perhaps "effectively" decentralized - in terms of every node having a full working copy of entire repositories that can be trivially cloned to another pr

More ›