Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
not2b
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
42 ms
·
631.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
By that reasoning, if the company refuses to comment an article should not be published, or if published must be rejected as one sided? That's convenient.
632.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
While this may or may not be the case, Pinker is a linguist and has neither the expertise nor evidence to back up this assertion. I don't think modern American suburbs resemble the African savanna. But the chaparral terrain on much of
633.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
It's more likely to work the other way around. Suppose you train your system to try to match human hiring decisions, and some of your hiring managers have an unconscious bias against members of group X, enough to make a small differenc
634.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
I think this is premature. https://www.datacenterknowledge.com/arm/arm-chips-gaining-da...
635.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
"hilariously robust", the article says.
636.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
Yes, I thought I had an early memory of 2.5 year old me sad because my tricycle broke, but it turned out that my father took an 8mm film that included this (the solid rubber tire split and came off), that we watched a number of times when I
637.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
Such cases could be handled if there were a way to verify that a spoofed number is an authorized use. Your cellphone number belongs to you. Some bank's 800 number does not. What we need is a mechanism that prevents the scammers from ly
638.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
Bezos paid $250M for the WaPo. Much more like a hobby purchase than Musk blowing such a huge fraction of his net worth on a company that's unlikely ever to be profitable.
639.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
$44 billion for Twitter is not being conservative with wealth.
640.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
That should be enough. A block list of prominent trademarked characters might also be possible. That would still leave a huge space of possible ideas.
641.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
Because the trademark is right there in the prompt? Like "Mickey Mouse on the moon" or some such?
642.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
How are you planning to deal with the trademark issue? If your customers ask you to make them a shirt based on a cartoon character owned by a company with an aggressive legal department, you might face trouble.
643.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
For a well-known cartoon figure, the issue isn't copyright, it's trademark. If someone types "Mickey Mouse" and this site has Stable Diffusion design a Mickey Mouse shirt and sell it, they are infringing Disney's tr
644.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
Doubt it. As bad as the current court is, some of the conservative members take the First Amendment seriously (Gorsuch, Roberts) so I think the parodist will win.
645.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
No, that's a separate question. Qualified immunity is about whether the cops can be punished for their misconduct, but what is being appealed is a crazy court decision that basically says satire and parody isn't protected speech u
646.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
Couldn't they just use a Merkle tree, like git does, to keep track of the history? I think that's what he's referring to here. They don't need proof of work if the code that can modify the history is trusted.
647.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
... and I always read the details before proceeding (finding out what chrome's problem with the cert is).
648.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
Yes, there is. I often have to use it to deal with some internal misconfigured site inside the corporate intranet (the cause is almost always that a certificate has expired, when it isn't it's because a host can be reached with tw
649.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
The EU is talking about imposing much the same rule, if they haven't already (link is from 2019): https://spacenews.com/eu-space-envoy-calls-for-satellites-to...
650.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
If FHE could be made to work (and we are a long way off), the cloud provider would not be able to see your data even though you're doing processing on the data that remains on the cloud provider's CPUs, so in that sense it would p
651.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
No, the point of FHE isn't that regular encryption is already compromised. It's that you can do processing on encrypted data while it's encrypted, without decrypting it. This opens up many more possibilities. For example, a c
652.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
I meant oldest surviving literature, so we agree.
653.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
So if 4. is the definition, the Epic of Gilgamesh is first, because it's in a different class than what came before. But if 1. is the definition, the article is clearly right as there are older works.
654.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
Just got "We’re experiencing a temporary issue with signups due to a vendor outage. We apologize for the inconvenience!"
655.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
I read it, but too quickly. Sorry. As you say, the main problem is that only gcc has a usable implementation; the other issues, for me, are an acceptable tradeoff (reasonable speed, but sometimes difficulty because inlining hid something).
656.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
Yes, those who think -Og is no good because they are clang users should perhaps file bug reports or contribute improvements instead.
657.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
The author needs to learn about the -Og switch, which can be used together with debugging. It can be thought of as "do those optimizations that don't interfere with debugging". I verified with Godbolt that this suffices to el
658.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
The market doesn't want Zuckerberg's version. Maybe some day someone will get it right in a way that's good enough to be interesting.
659.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
It seems most commenters want to interpret this as a threat, or as a way to discourage use of FOSS by government. I don't think it is either one. The US government isn't a monolith, it's thousands of semi-independent fiefdoms
660.
▲
by
not2b
4y ago
If they extend an existing GPL work, the work as a whole is GPL, even if their added code is PD.
More ›