Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
noslenwerdna
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
1y ago
Sure, it's just that the era of super high paying programming jobs may be over. And also, manufacturing jobs have greatly changed. And the effect is not even, I imagine. Some types of manufacturing jobs are just gone.
32.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
1y ago
Everyone should do the tasks where they provide unique value. You could make the same arguments you just made for recorded music, automobiles, computers in general in fact.
33.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
1y ago
I didn't know the FTC got involved in Afghanistan
34.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
2y ago
Journalists are (or were) on Twitter though
35.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
2y ago
As an ex-HEP, I can confirm that yes, we had blinding and did correct for multiple hypothesis testing explicitly. As Kyle Cranmer points out, we called it the "look elsewhere effect." Blinding is enforced by the physics group. You
36.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
2y ago
He is implying that the scientists involved haven't thought of those questions, when in reality this field is one of the strictest in terms of statistical procedures like pre registeration, blinding, multiple hypothesis testing etc Als
37.
▲
New limits on WIMP dark matter from LZ
(newscenter.lbl.gov)
1 points
by
noslenwerdna
2y ago
|
0 comments
38.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
2y ago
I never said anything about practicality, you are confusing my replies with someone else's. I said this "But why do those fields deserve more money, when at least a large part of the problem is cultural." More money won'
39.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
2y ago
That is fair. Is what you suggest possible though?
40.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
2y ago
I agree that studying psychology better could be beneficial. Is it possible? Or more to the point, is it merely a matter of money, as you said? I said a large part of the problem is cultural, I did not say that psychology is the only field
41.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
2y ago
But why do those fields deserve more money, when at least a large part of the problem is cultural. One example is the famous reluctance to publish negative results in psychology. Nearly all published results in (collider) particle physics a
42.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
2y ago
I didn't claim that it means they are "bad" whatever that means. I am saying that we should take those claims less seriously, especially if the results from that domain don't replicate, as in the case of psychology and o
43.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
2y ago
Depends what you count as hard science. The replication rate in high energy particle physics is near 100%? When the LHC started up they were able to measure nearly all of the particle resonances found in the 20th century. It's not like
44.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
2y ago
As others have said, that's not what a Schwarzschild radius means. You would only get a black hole if all the matter is inside the radius. The Schwarzschild radius comes from the free space solution to Einstein's equation. It only
45.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
2y ago
Fair enough
46.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
2y ago
The copernican principle is separate from the model. Basically it says that our position in the universe is random - we don't exist at the center of the universe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copernican_principle
47.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
2y ago
I've seen this discussion a lot, but what about when they hire a sound-a-like voice actor for a cartoon after a popular movie? Case in point, Owen Wilson was the voice of the main character in the Cars movie, but they got a different v
48.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
2y ago
Of course, there would also be other markers. Fertilizers is one. Another is the plants and animals they used for food. Why are some plants and animals still indigenous to certain areas, assuming there was a small globe spanning civilizatio
49.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
2y ago
But there are other chemicals that a civilization might produce that are also visible in the geological record. Fertilizers would also leave a mark.
50.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
2y ago
If they were as advanced as we are now, we would have seen that the atmospheric CO2 levels had been higher back then, no? This paper draws the conclusions that such a civilization would be visible in the geological record. https:/
51.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
3y ago
I think the point is it should be part of the upfront cost when searching, rather than something that shows up at the end.
52.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
3y ago
Definitely downloading and uploading company documents to people outside the company counts as stealing...
53.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
3y ago
I think at an individual level it is logical to make the choice to go to an ivy if you have the chance. But ivy league schools don't present themselves as just a networking opportunity. They present themselves as a way to get a much hi
54.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
3y ago
Is this not a deeply cynical reason to go to an Ivy league school? Recruiters target those schools so you get a job that will allow you to make more money, and simply because you get access to better connected people (again to make more mon
55.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
3y ago
He admitted to it and showed the police where he hid the body as part of a plea bargain.
56.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
3y ago
He's one of the scientists being recruited from a university (they address him by name). He also says something about building a cyclotron when they are constructing Los Alamos. And he sits behind a window of a car or truck during the
57.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
3y ago
Is this epigenetics? Don't want to assume anything, but maybe this wasn't well known when you were in school. I vaguely remember reading about this a decade ago.
58.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
3y ago
Is it possible to add a legend? What do these colors represent in terms of visibility?
59.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
3y ago
It's also a good selector for having parents who got into Harvard https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legacy_preferences
60.
▲
by
noslenwerdna
3y ago
Yes, of course, building the largest physics and math department in the world to come up with your trading strategy. Yes, there's always that option.
More ›