noselasd

36 ms·

391.
by noselasd 9y ago
Why would it break a ton of posix software? They seem to have ported the musl c library, they removed to have stuff like cmake vim git openssh running on it
392.
by noselasd 9y ago
For managing a hypervisor, e.g. creating a vcpu for a guest VM
393.
by noselasd 9y ago
Given he uses Fusion360, I'd bet he also uses Fusion360 for CAM - its CAM is pretty awesome - the value of integrated CAD/CAM instead of dealing with separate CAM is very compelling.
394.
by noselasd 9y ago
> Why don't towers have a sort of encryption certificate verifying they're legit? Pushback from various parties/regimes to keep this out of the standards. (e.g. the brits pushed back against strong encryption in the 1. GSM
395.
by noselasd 9y ago
Because the personal machine might be used to develop for a production machine running RHEL 6, and that cannot be upgraded because reasons(no time, software doesn't support RHEL 7 yet, $precious_driver doesn't support RHEL 7, + a
396.
by noselasd 9y ago
It might be a config issue, not a firmware issue. There are numerous guides/howtos floating around for configuring cisco/juniper/etc. equipment that uses 1.1.1.1,2.2.2.2 for things like loopback addresses(these are used for
397.
by noselasd 9y ago
Note that the stackoverflow post does not technically apply. accept() finds the smalles available file descriptor - it will never suddenly hand you a file descriptor of a huge integer value. You can also control this with the "max open
398.
by noselasd 9y ago
I'm still wondering about going with plain kubernetes, or investing time in OpenShift. Any insights from people that have tried both ways ?
399.
by noselasd 9y ago
Note that in linux, threads are the unit of scheduling, not processes.
400.
by noselasd 9y ago
Are they really competing problems ? Most users don't care, they get their updates when Microsoft decides to. The users that do care, and want or need to opt out of the updates know what they are doing and can take responsibility for t
401.
by noselasd 9y ago
Its name is not apparent, and it's the first item shown when you search for chromecast.
402.
by noselasd 9y ago
You mean there is no chance of it ever spreading outside New Zealand, or infecting similar species ?
403.
by noselasd 9y ago
They're both correct. There are two different effects. - less gravity, time goes faster. - More speed, time goes slower. In this case, the effect of less gravity is greater than the effect of having more speed. The classic
404.
by noselasd 9y ago
Takes longer to move your gaze, and less of the road is in your peripheral vision.
405.
by noselasd 9y ago
Probably the commenter was born after 1962.
406.
by noselasd 9y ago
But it doesn't. Consumer gear NATs UDP pretty much as nice as it does TCP.
407.
by noselasd 9y ago
Why does it matter that IPv6 is old, if your users are only using IPv4 ?
408.
by noselasd 9y ago
Nowadays, posix_spawn() calls clone() on linux, with the CLONE_VM flag, behaving much like vfork() as far as I can tell. That means the child and parent process shares the memory (until exec() is performed). Especially if the parent process
409.
by noselasd 9y ago
I would think people deploy BGP to automate routing and routing policies, not primarily to avoid loops.
410.
by noselasd 9y ago
AMD is not susceptible to Meltdown. So the issue is not inherent to the x86_64 architecture. Knowing that, can it be possible that Intel can patch their CPU via micro-code in a manner that does not affect performance to a great degree, and
411.
by noselasd 9y ago
Those strong arguments were not coming from Intel. To me it's more surprising that someone not involved in the design of Intel CPUs can state what Intel can and can not do - after all, not that long ago people didn't even know the
412.
by noselasd 9y ago
> Intel CPUs allow this, but AMD CPUs do not. Do we know this for sure ? I see now that the meltdown paper has a suggestion in chapter 7.1 that the CPU should perform the permission check on the page table before data is fetched to the c
413.
by noselasd 9y ago
It's not so much about sensitive info residing in the kernel, but that the kernel has an identity mapping of the entire physical memory, Thus if you can read kernel memory, you can dump all ram, where secrets from other processes or vi
414.
by noselasd 9y ago
So I have read the meltdown.pdf paper, but I don't quite understand why/how it bypasses the kernel/usermode checks of the pagetable, does anyone have a good explanation ? Furthermore the paper mentions it is unable to reprodu
415.
by noselasd 9y ago
For many architectures the coherency is turned off and managed in software by the device driver, to achieve better performance.
416.
by noselasd 9y ago
You can, but spectre only affects your own process, and if you can compile/run your program, it's unlikely that exploiting anything to read the memory of your own process is any danger.
417.
by noselasd 9y ago
ADVChina - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwNPa8fSXzzAZuT9859GVhg Smarter Every Day - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6107grRI4m0o2-emgoDnAA Tested - https://www.youtube.com/ch
418.
by noselasd 9y ago
The issue is if you are not the exchange admin. In most IT departments the default answer to everything, including "please turn on IMAP" is No.
419.
by noselasd 9y ago
Well, yes - but where is the confusion ?
420.
by noselasd 9y ago
Sure, but there's a layer that emulates the linux syscalls. Though perhaps it's more appropriate to call it "translates" instead of emulate.

More ›