Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
noosphr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
27 ms
·
661.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
>And, no, Wine cannot run anything. Wine may not be able to run the apps you need, but it can run plenty. The older the software gets the more wine becomes the only option to run it.
662.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
People defer thinking about what correct and incorrect actually looks like for a whole wide scope of scenarios and instead choose to discover through trial and error. LLMs are _still_ terrible at deriving even the simplest
663.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
I've moved from Linux to OpenBSD for this reason. It's all so boring it's wonderful.
664.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
> Another thing we can learn from the past is the failure of characterizations like "Computing Science is really nothing but X", where for X you may substitute your favourite discipline, such as numerical analysis, electrical e
665.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266649842...
666.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
It's their 2060 plan. Take it up with the CPP.
667.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
These people don't have access to the grid. That's the issue to begin with.
668.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
It absolutely does not. But having electricity 13 days every two weeks is much better than not having it at all. This isn't about China building out their grid with an over capacity factor of 200% so they can keep everything running ev
669.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
Genuine question: what can go wrong?
670.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
This is the big one. In 2006 when the first EC2 instances showed up they were on par with an ok laptop and would take 24 months to pay enough in rent to cover the cost of hardware. Today the smallest instance is a joke and the medium instan
671.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
I remember those numbers being a third that 20 years ago. Either we have evolved brand new eyes without noticing or you are just talking about the current state of the art like it's the limit of human vision. Put another way look at 30
672.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
I can't find the article where I read it, many years ago now, but it was about strategies that small communities can adopt to keep their culture from being subsumed by the mainstream. One was to pick a set of norms repugnant to the mai
673.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
OpenBSD is a very well kept secret that very few people are aware of. As close to nirvana as I can manage. The fact I miss pretty much all the drama around the latest corporate take over attempts on Linux is just icing on the cake. The toxi
674.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
We are all dead in a matter of time.
675.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
The whole thread started someone making the wrong point that: >They are of no commercial interest to Ubuntu. Which is plainly false. Julian can believe whatever he wants, in fact the more naively idealistic he is the better for Canonical
676.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
I'd say push tricycle. After all chains are too complicated an you hardly need them in the kids playground.
677.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
There is no such thing as top of the line. There are preferences. Asking where to begin with 'modern' Emacs is like asking where to begin with 'music'. Just use stock until you find something you like better. It is one o
678.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
Yes, the blind stumble down hill eventually. But we let them do it in their own time.
679.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Scorpion_and_the_Frog I don't understand how people keep giving the benefit of the doubt to corporations. They aren't people. They feel no guilt and have no shame.
680.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
I'm glad you understand how self defense works.
681.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
Yes, but we're not making a push to make everything a bilingual c/lisp code base. Rust people for some reason are.
682.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
I find that languages with a high intellectual barrier to entry are much more pleasant places to be since people like the OP can't understand them and we never have people try to bully us into doing things _the right way_. This is some
683.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
You could just read his signiture in the mailing list. https://mastodon.social/@juliank >Senior Engineer at Canonical.
684.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
I'm very happy with common lisp for fast code. Of course most people aren't smart enough for the language so they have to use inferior algol languages like rust.
685.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
The person making the post is getting paid by Ubuntu.
686.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
I don't get the need for Rust since I happily compile common lisp to machine code when I need fast binaries. But the people who use the language have an amazing talent to make people on the fence hate them within half a dozen sentences
687.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
>While it is technically feasible, it is not a good idea to try and find a technical solution to a people/organisation problem.
688.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
A sota decoder model is a bigger deal than yet another trillion parameter encoder only model trained on benchmarks. I don't get why you think that the only way that you can beat the big guys is by having more parameters than them.
689.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
State of the art doesn't mean frontier.
690.
▲
by
noosphr
1y ago
>Otherwise we'd see SOTA models from new groups every month We do. It's just that startups don't go after the frontier models but niche spaces which are under served and can be explored with a few million in hardware. Just
More ›