Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
noncoml
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
noncoml
3mo ago
We will be able to afford RAM and SSD again
32.
▲
by
noncoml
3mo ago
Or you can go full Reddit and just block anything that seems even remotely suspicious. Your sibling, roommate, neighbor that uses your internet, previous IP owner, posts too much? You get blocked too. Using VPN? Blocked. Your iPhone is too
33.
▲
by
noncoml
3mo ago
moron
34.
▲
by
noncoml
3mo ago
What are the dystopian parts then? You didn’t explain..?
35.
▲
by
noncoml
3mo ago
Actually Brave New World was a utopia, not dystopia. Many confuse it with 1984. Every need of the common people was met and their happiness was catered for. And those who were unusually independent, intellectually curious, creative or could
36.
▲
by
noncoml
3mo ago
Right. The uber rich are sure to share the wealth. Thanks for the laugh. Americans are fucked. European on the other hand may start bring out the guillotines again.
37.
▲
by
noncoml
3mo ago
This generation is f*cked, just like that generation was. The new jobs are for the next generation.
38.
▲
by
noncoml
3mo ago
> For personal use I don't care if I get access to it. Tokens are becoming too expensive. How is this a rational argument? Are you so self centered that you only care about government decisions that affect ONLY the present you? “I d
39.
▲
by
noncoml
3mo ago
When was the last time you place or received a call to/from PSTN?
40.
▲
by
noncoml
3mo ago
> clearly ethically wrong Ethics are subjective. That’s why we have courts judge based on the law and not ethics
41.
▲
by
noncoml
3mo ago
Cough.. cough.. Uber.. cough cough AirBNB
42.
▲
by
noncoml
3mo ago
The US spent decades transferring manufacturing, capital, and know-how to China, while Chinese students trained, and excelled, at elite Western universities. Why are people surprised that China eventually became capable of competing with th
43.
▲
by
noncoml
4mo ago
Are companies allowed to make “Show HN” posts? How is this different than X company saying we build Y, when they literally paid people to do it for them?
44.
▲
by
noncoml
4mo ago
> Isn't this basically admitting you had nothing to do with this project No. They had nothing to do with the code. The project is not only the code. > and anyone else could pay an ai to make the same thing easily? This assumes th
45.
▲
by
noncoml
4mo ago
CEOs laid people off to replace them with AI, but turns out AI is more expensive and does a worse job. If I made a blunder of that scale, would I or would I not be put on a PIP?
46.
▲
by
noncoml
4mo ago
Musk found a perfect market hack, buy a company at 10x their revenue and sell it in the stock market at 100x
47.
▲
by
noncoml
4mo ago
“ai-x”? Elon? You know that you are not allowed to in this forum. It’s only for adults. Go back to Twitter and play with the other kids.
48.
▲
by
noncoml
4mo ago
I don't know how you simplify things so much... Do you want 94% tax on stocks? Why stop at stocks? How about property? Your house's net worth? The social equality shouldn't be based on how much poorer we are in comparison to
49.
▲
by
noncoml
4mo ago
That's different than chanting "Ban Billionaires"
50.
▲
by
noncoml
4mo ago
> Safe to say they wouldn't agree here Maybe because they do not like to blindly follow the "leader", but instead prefer to judge for themselves? Democrats don't want "bad" immigration as much as you do. No-
51.
▲
by
noncoml
4mo ago
One of the main reasons I fell in love with computers was determinism. I always felt weird seeing people get upset and curse at the C++ compiler. In my mind, the “computer” will always give you the same output for the same input. Therefore,
52.
▲
by
noncoml
4mo ago
Thank you. I stand corrected.
53.
▲
by
noncoml
4mo ago
I am going to stand more on the “the key is not exploitation but empathy. What do users really want?“ I’m sorry Mr Graham, but that’s not what empathy is. A casino understands what its “users” want. So does a drug dealer. Empathy is caring
54.
▲
by
noncoml
4mo ago
"trust me bro"
55.
▲
by
noncoml
4mo ago
How can you make such bold and generic claims without some data backing it?
56.
▲
by
noncoml
4mo ago
Based on their actions, not their words, my reading is that they just don't have the compute capacity to rollout Mythos or Fable.
57.
▲
by
noncoml
4mo ago
At the moment codex/gpt5.5 runs cycles around claude/opus. Fable is stupidly expansive, and Mythos is just a myth. I don't find any reason to switch back to Anthropic, and they seem to be find with it...
58.
▲
by
noncoml
4mo ago
Disillusioned CEOs convincing themselves they have the mandate and right to define morality for everyone else. They get to decide what is right, wrong, permissible, or dangerous from the top, in the name of "safety". This is corpo
59.
▲
by
noncoml
4mo ago
The point isn’t whether the aviation term "autopilot" has a technically defensible meaning, but that "Autopilot" predictably made normal people think "the car drives itself", just like "AI" now makes
60.
▲
by
noncoml
4mo ago
It's our fault for stupidly naming everything AI: A* search -> AI Backtracking -> AI Neural Networks -> AI Fuzzy Logic -> AI Genetic Algorithm -> AI Deep Learning -> AI Generative "AI" -> AI Similar to Te
More ›