Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nomel
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
nomel
10d ago
How is this, or the 3-7 similar news articles you post every day, appropriate for HN!?
32.
▲
by
nomel
10d ago
If they did supply images, to supporting the attacks, that did or even didn't result in the death of soldiers, then they were first to commit an act of aggression towards a nuclear superpower. This is a measured response to that act
33.
▲
by
nomel
11d ago
So, you're saying that this requires all people of the world get along and agree with anything that might cause war? That sounds like a reasonable plan! Thanks for the response.
34.
▲
by
nomel
11d ago
> false positives, which might lead to interventions, even exploratory, that are not zero-risk Do you have an example in mind for this? Non-zero risk interventions are pretty rare if only one signal is present. If that signal was deeme
35.
▲
by
nomel
11d ago
> I will be similarly unsurprised if many of the outcomes from this raft of scanning are procedures that are medically unnecessary. I have trouble comprehending this perspective. The point of defect detection is detecting defects. The I
36.
▲
by
nomel
11d ago
So, what solution do you have in mind, if China supplies military support to an adversary? Politely ask them to stop? Let them continue? Seems not so trivial to me, especially since everyone has satellites up there for this purpose, and the
37.
▲
by
nomel
11d ago
> As long as warmongers are in control we will continue to live in danger and fear. Can you expand on your solution to world peace?
38.
▲
by
nomel
11d ago
Don't worry, airdrop does it too! I've accidentally sent airdrop requests to strangers from their profile picture moving under my finger as I'm approaching to touch someone else's. The single most idiotic design I'
39.
▲
by
nomel
11d ago
No, they do not actually, because they fall out of orbit in ~5 years, since they're in the lower part of the thermosphere.
40.
▲
by
nomel
11d ago
It's worse than this! You Type C-H-E then you go to press enter, and it changes the results as you're pressing it, opening the wrong thing! I've turned off all the search targets, except for applications and folders.
41.
▲
by
nomel
11d ago
> someone just needs to You did the meme. ;) Literally billions of dollars are waiting for you, after you complete this simple task! Problem is, what's stopping you? What stopping everyone else? Why did everyone that tried so far fa
42.
▲
by
nomel
12d ago
It seems that decreases error curve always has the same shape. Is there a name for this shape? I assume you could sample just a few points and have a good estimate of what the error will be for any truncation. And, this makes me naively ass
43.
▲
by
nomel
12d ago
Quest Pro has eye tracking, and Red Matter 2 used it.
44.
▲
by
nomel
14d ago
I would rather have a nice popup on first attempt "this application is monitoring your clipboard, allow?", ideally with that process completely suspended while that prompt is up. This should be behind a toggle driven by intent, ra
45.
▲
by
nomel
14d ago
How many people have worked on this problem? How many have failed? How many hours total?
46.
▲
by
nomel
14d ago
> That flies in the face of the evidence. Please provide some evidence besides your opinion. > The Koreans weren't genetically engineering themselves to be taller and smarter than their parents and their cousins in DPRK. The Spa
47.
▲
by
nomel
15d ago
Here's the twin take: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2811965/ > Results indicate that genetic influences account for over 60% of the variance in scientific achievement, with environmental influen
48.
▲
by
nomel
15d ago
They're either dishonest, or they're too stupid to know how to use the internet. You pick. Seriously, what's the alternative here? The only exception would be an honest person too afraid to speak up, to correct the dishones
49.
▲
by
nomel
15d ago
If an author let AI do 90 to 95% of the work, cleaned up the remaining 5 to 10% themselves, would you say AI or the author wrote it? Because this is roughly the split between an author and an editor, with human writing, now.
50.
▲
by
nomel
15d ago
> If they have to pay a carbon tax out of their profits, which generation types are they going to add? I see. Thanks for understand! How do you motivate them to actually add capacity? With a monopoly, it seems that adding supply for so
51.
▲
by
nomel
15d ago
"Contact killing" is real [1]. A copper ring will definitely kill some bacteria/virus on the skin immediately near where they touch. Related, most copper solutions are considered hazardous waste. [1] https://pmc.nc
52.
▲
by
nomel
15d ago
That article has a very silly conclusion with the whole obesity example, and doesn't understand the actual conclusion that the sensitivity analysis that these numbers are derived from, means (especially with their plant example).
53.
▲
by
nomel
15d ago
The fact that the equation 440 * 2^((n-49)/12) is nowhere to be found makes me strongly disagree.
54.
▲
by
nomel
15d ago
I suspect she was pushed along by adults, with particular motives, more than anything. Regardless, nobody involved is honest, and I suspect the honest ones were told the be quiet.
55.
▲
by
nomel
15d ago
It's a standard subwoofer speaker/driver put in a ported enclosure, running at 30Hz, creating a particularly "fast punch" sub. The design of this would have all the same goals of a normal subwoofer: moving a bunch of air
56.
▲
by
nomel
15d ago
IQ by state [1]. Remove California, and it'll go up a bit! [1] https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/average-iq-...
57.
▲
by
nomel
15d ago
Do those problems exist as much if the excess was forced into them investing into a certain type of power generation? It seems less "heavy handed", since it's a proper investment for them. I enjoy a particularly nasty utili
58.
▲
by
nomel
15d ago
Does that change the math above if they're tied into the grid? If they're tied directly to the renewables (Meta is doing this in some places), then true, not a technical increase. But you could still maybe claim they're inste
59.
▲
by
nomel
15d ago
Sure, but it seems very reasonable to expect some co-hosting of latency sensitive tasks, especially with some low hanging thin client fruit, like cloud gaming and the like. I've been very happy not burning a thousand watts of $0.45&#
60.
▲
by
nomel
15d ago
There's also a power generation water cost though! Something like 500g/MWh for gas/coal/nuclear (~70% of power in AZ), so a huge xAI datacenter (Colossus 2, ~1 GW/h) would use ~700 MW of this type, or ~350k gallons
More ›